Kangaroo Care BIBLIOGRAPHY Develope

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Aucott S., Donohue PK, Atkins E., Allen MC. 2002. Neurodevelopmental carein the NICU. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews,8(4), 298-308.On page 304 are 1.33 columns of KC, mostly citing the Conde-Agudelo 2002 Cochrane Review. Says that parent disenfranchisement is biggestNICU problem, and KC corrects this on page 304. There is a whole column devotedto KC history (very brief) and outcomes of the 2002 Conde-Agudelo meta-analysis.ReviewBakewell-Sachs, S., Blackburn, S. 2003. State of the Science:Achievements and challenges across the spectrum of care for preterm infants. JObstet Gynecol Neonatal Nursing, 32 #5, 683-695. On page 688 it states “Manydevelopmental strategies were implemented before undergoing adequate scientifictesting. More research is needed,but the evidence base is growing forinterventions such as cycled lighting, kangaroo care, nonnutritive sucking,containment, touch, and positioning, due in large part to the work of nurseresearchers”.Bowie BH, Hall RB, Faulkner J, Anderson B. 2003. Single-room infant care:future trends in special care nursery planning and design. Neonatal Network 22(4), 27-34. On page 28 it states: “Also in the early 1990s several articleswere published documenting the benefits of skin-to-skin(kangaroo) care, andforthe first time in many nurseries, parents were encouraged to participate in thecare of their preterm infant.” And “Privacy became limited;movable screens wereused to give a sense of privacy for breastfeeding mothers and for parentsproviding Kangaroo Care.” They have drawing of KC in a single-room on page 31.PT. Not KC study per se.Christensson Bhat et al.. 1995De Chateau. 1979. Effects of Hospital Practices on synchrony in thedevelopment of the infant-parent relationship. Seminars in Perinatology, 3(1),45-60.Drummond T. 1998. Touch early and often. Time July 27, 1998, p. 54-55.Speaks to Dr. Tiffany Fields work with massaging preterm infants and theirimprovement in weight gain.Epstein, R., Herer, P, Tzischinsky, O., & Lavie, P. (1997). Changing fromcommunal to familial sleep arrangement in the Kibbutz Effects on sleep quality.Sleep, 20(5): 334-339. Better quality sleep when they change from communalsleep to sleeping with families.Communal sleep group slept worse than childrenexamined during Golf War. Improvement in sleep quality is due to children'sincreased sense of security when sleeping with their families.Feldman R, Eidelman AI. (1998). Intervention programs for prematureinfants. How do they affect development? Clinics in Perinatology, 25(3): 613-626. This review article states that “Kangaroo Care is suggested as theintervention that most logically meshes the premature infant’s need to developstate regulation while facilitating sequential sensory development and promotingmother-infant attachment.Field, T.F. (1990) Alleviating stress in newborn infants in intensive careunit. Clinics in Perinatology, 17(1), 1-9.Freda, M.C. 2003. Nursing’s Contribution to the literature on pretermlabor and birth. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nursing, 32(5), 659-667. On page 664she writes “Another intervention for the preterm infant that has been studiedoften by nurses is skin-to-skin care or kangaroo care (KC). It is thought thatthis intervention decreases neonatal energy expenditure and promotes infantgrowth. Ludington-Hoe et al. (1999) found that beginning in the delivery room,KC could be done safely and that infants’ temperatures rose rapidly to the70
thermoneutral range while the infants were receiving KC. They concluded that KCwas conducive to recovery from birth fatigue in 34- to 36- week preterm infants.Chwo et al (2002) randomly assigned preterm infants to groups, those receivingKC and those not receiving KC, and found that infants receiving KC had highermean tympanic temperature, more quiet sleep, and less crying than those who didnot recive KC. In one survey of 537 NICUs in the United States (Engler et al.,2002), 82% of the NICUs were practicing KC. Enlger found that nurses perceivedsome barriers to its use, such as has lack of scientific knowledge about whetherKC care was appropriate for all neonates, as well as some nurses’ concerns aboutinfant safety.” Then it goes on for another whole paragraph relating GeneAnderson’s case studies, saying KC has positive parental and infant outcomeswith a depressed mother, when begun within 4 hours of birth in an NICU, fortwins and adolescent parents, for adoptive parents, for triplets and a mom withpre-eclampsia.Gorski, P., Huntington, L., & Lewkowicz, D. (1990). Handling preterminfants in hospitals. Clinics in Perinatology, 17(1), 103-112.Harrison, L. (1997). Research utilization: Handling preterm infants inthe NICU. Neonatal Network, 16(3): 65-69. On page 66 & 67 she discussesKangaroo Care and its benefits. On page 68 she states more research is needed toanswer the question: When is itHarrison L, Woods S. (1991). Early parental touch and preterm infants.JOGNN, 20, 299-306/Hill ST, Shronk LK. 1979. The effect of early parent-infant contact onnewborn body temperature. JOGN Nursing Sept/Oct. 1979, 287-290. This was studycomparing 50 dried, wrapped infants in parental arms to 50 dried, wrapped infantunder radiant warmer just after birth. No differences in temperatures.Kattwinkel, J., Brooks, J., Keenan, M.E., & Malloy, M. (1997). Task forceon infant positioning and SIDS: Does bed sharing affect the risk of SIDS?Pediatrics, 100(2): 272.Kenner C, Lott J.W. 2003. Comprehensive Neonatal Nursing: A PhysiologicPerspective. 3 rd Ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co. KC was also discussed inthe 1998 2 nd edition. Has pictures and protocol of KC. Look pg. 260, chapter 17(Newborn and Infant Neurobehavioral Development chapter by Diane Holditch-Davis,S.T. Blackburn, and K. Vandenberg). It is also in Chapter 49, pg. 959-960 onAssessment and Management of Neonatal Neurobehavioral Development.Kovach, A.C. (2002)A 5-year follow-up of hospital breastfeeding policiesin the Philadelphia area: A comparison with the ten-steps. J Human Lactation,18(2), 144-153. On page 145 they list a question in their survey of 35Philadelphia hospitals, “Are babies’ temperatures stabilized skin-to-skin withthe mother rather than under radiant warmers?” and on page 150 report: “only 3hospitals(9%) regulated a baby’s temp skin to skin and 11 (31%)reported doingthis sometimes. When asked about skin to skin contact following delivery, mosthospitals placed babies skin to skin with their mothers all or most of the time(10 or 29%) or sometimes (14, 40%). Some hospitals did the APGAR score while thebaby was skin to skin with the mother all or some of the time (n=10,29%).”(150).KC FOR WARMING INFANTSMcCain G. 2003. Evidence based practice for neonatal nursing. NeonatalNetwork 22 (6), 5-6. On page 5 she states “early Skin-to-skin contact beweenmother and newborn has a positive effect on BF at 1 and 3 months after birth(citing Anderson et al, 2003 Cochrane review results). She says evidencesupports adoption of skin-to-skin care, but nurses must first be educated aboutthe benefits of the practice and then develop a guideline or protocol.71
Page 1: Richard CA, Mosko SS. 2004. Mother-
Page 5: ole of cholescystokinin and opioids

Kangaroo Care BIBLIOGRAPHY Develope

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?