U.S. Navy Chief Engineman Edward Young speaks with a foreign naval officer on a pier in Dakar, Senegal, Feb. 4, 2009, aboard theamphibious transport dock ship USS Nashville (LPD 13). Nashville is in Senegal for Africa Partnership Station (APS) 2009, an internationalinitiative developed by Naval Forces Europe and Naval Forces Africa, which aims to work cooperatively with U.S. and international partners toimprove maritime safety and security on the African continent. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication <strong>Special</strong>ist 2nd Class David Holmes)7: Attack the RootCauses of the Problemto Achieve LongerLasting SolutionsStakeholders’ frustrated needs andgrievances often fuel the sources androot causes for support to irregularactors. Full understanding of thesefactors may require detailed analysisof regional history, ethnicity, culture,politics and religion. Improvedgovernance will usually bring aboutmarginalization of irregular actors to apoint where they are destroyed,co-opted or reduced to irrelevance innumbers and capability. U.S. militaryintervention may cease when successis assured, but before it is actuallyachieved.8: Establish SecurityUnder the Rule of LawWithout a secure environment,implementing permanent reformsis problematic and can lead tospreading disorder. To establishlegitimacy, <strong>Command</strong>ers seekto transition security activitiesfrom combat operations to lawenforcement, as quickly as feasible.When insurgents are seen ascriminals, they lose public support.Using a legal system establishedin-line with local culture and practicesto deal with such criminals, enhancesthe host nation government’slegitimacy. The violence levelmust be reduced enough forpolice forces to maintain orderprior to any transition; otherwise,counterinsurgency (COIN) forces willbe unable to secure the populace andmay lose the legitimacy gained by thetransition.9: Prepare for a LongTerm CommitmentAt the strategic level, gaining andmaintaining U.S. public support forcommencing military operationsis crucial, however, experienceshows that the typical timeframe forpolitical and public support is threeto five years. The irregular threat’sprimary battle is against the hostnation government, not the <strong>United</strong><strong>States</strong>; however, U.S. support can becrucial to building public faith in thatgovernment’s viability. The Americanpublic will not actively support thehost nation government unless theyare convinced that the military’sdeployed forces have the means,ability, stamina, and will to win.16 <strong>Horizons</strong> – Helping sHape tHe Future oF soF
10: Manage Informationand ExpectationsInformation and expectations arerelated; the joint force <strong>Command</strong>ermust manage both. To limitdiscontent and build support, thehost nation government, and anyjoint forces in assistance, mustcreate and maintain a realisticset of expectations among thepopulace, friendly military forces,and the international community.Information <strong>Operations</strong> (IO), includingpsychological operations and therelated activities of public affairsand civil-military operations, are keytools to accomplish this. Campaigndesigners must use operations tocreate and maintain an appropriatemessage, thus helping to controlexpectations of the population.11: Use the AppropriateLevel of ForceIt is vital for <strong>Command</strong>ers to adoptappropriate and measured levels offorce and apply that force preciselyso that it accomplishes the mission,without causing unnecessary loss oflife or suffering.12: Empower theLowest LevelsDelegating <strong>Command</strong> authoritydown to the lowest level for missionexecution is ideally suited to themosaic nature of countering irregularthreats. Local <strong>Command</strong>ers havethe best grasp of their situations.Under mission command, they aregiven access to, or control of theresources needed to, produce timelyintelligence, conduct effective tacticaloperations, and manage IO and civilmilitaryoperations. Thus, effectiveoperations are decentralized, andhigher <strong>Command</strong>ers push as manycapabilities as possible downto their subordinates. Missioncommand encourages the initiativeof subordinates and facilitates thatthe learning that must occur atevery level. The lowest echelonsare closest to the population andtherefore, must fight, adapt andreact, at least as quickly as theirregular threats.13: Employ theAppropriate Mix ofDirect and IndirectApproachesCampaign planners need todesign operations to blend thesetwo approaches in order to bestcounter irregular threats. Together,they integrate the requirement toimmediately disrupt adversarieswhile impacting the environment inwhich the irregular threats operate.The direct approach addresses theimmediate requirement to pursuethe difficult irregular threats, theirinfrastructure and their resources.It includes actions to kill, capture andinterdict violent extremist networks,and deny their access to and use ofweapons of mass destruction. Theindirect approach focuses on enablinga diverse range of partners. It entailsa broader long-term commitment tofoster a self-sustaining indigenouscapability and capacity to providesecurity, develop governance, andpromote development.14: Work With andThrough a DiverseRange of PartnersHost nation, Geographic Combatant<strong>Command</strong>, and Country Teamstrategies define the objectives incombating irregular threats. Planningmust coordinate an integrated theaterColonel Louis A. Caporicci is the Director of theFutures Directorate (J9). Previously, the Chiefof Concepts for J9 and Deputy <strong>Command</strong>er,SOCPAC. He is an AFSOF rotary wing commandpilot with extensive combat and contingencyexperience.Col Louis A. Caporiccieffort that is joint, inter-agency, andmulti-national to reduce inefficienciesand enhance strategy. Inter-agencycoordination during joint operationsbecomes extremely important. Thisis the best way to ensure that theefforts complement each otherand that available resources areused effectively and efficiently.Effective integration is difficult andconsists of much more than merecoordination. Ideally, endeavors suchas a well-resourced foreign internaldefense program will incorporate allinstruments in a coordinated andsupporting manner that addresseshost nation requirements, as well asU.S. national policy and interests.Are these 14 IW preceptsparticularly unique? No. They arerather a guiding imperative to devolveour joint force into something thatis better, as existed at varioustimes in our past. The joint forceof the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> is striving for aforce that functions in a distributedmanner, is not overly dependent upontechnology, can conduct operationswhen command and control failsat higher levels, leverages thepioneering and risk-taking nature ofour forefathers to forge friendshipsand liaisons to a mutual advantage,and underwrites the mistakesof junior leaders. Similar to thepast, times will dictate when theForce must come together to meetformidable challenges. Theseprecepts, if institutionalized andoperationalized across the Force, willyield a better force; and one that bestrepresents the values of this country.Fall 2009 17