Soap WorksPaul McLoughlinIt’s a force which draws in countless numbers of families into living rooms across thecountry. Sitting in front of television screens, for an hour or so while these programmesair, few sounds can be heard from these homes accept for the dramatic dialogue on thebox in the centre of the room, and perhaps the odd sigh of relief or excitement from itsaudience. Yes, we’re talking about ‘Bab Al Hara’, ‘Mirna oo Khalil’ and ‘Noor’; showsthat have an overwhelmingly large and loyal viewership in Oman, celebrating the unity ofRamadan nights. The power of the ‘soap opera’ is something which has been frequentlyoverlooked, and rarely understood, by those from the outside. Although there is noshame in the voyeuristic element to serial soaps that delve into the homes and rooms offamilies on a daily basis, the underlying power of being able to relate to and understandsociety on a larger scale from these dramas is discernible. And this ability for peoplefrom all walks of life to associate with alternating and contrasting surroundings has hada fundamental impact on the progression of society as a whole.Soap opera beganduring the days of radio;subservient housewiveswould often tend tocleaning and chores, whilstsnatching a few momentsof overly dramatisedentertainment on theradio. The clever men inmarketing were quickto grasp who their keyaudience was and beganto advertise soap productsduring the programmes, hence the name ‘Soap Opera’. For these women the lure oflearning more about the private details of others became a temptation too captivatingto ignore. After television’s timely entrance, stations quickly adopted the soap operaconcept, now dubbed a ‘serial drama’, and millions of more housewives began to ogleinto the lives of others. They were then able to wash away any feelings of voyeuristicguilt once credits rolled. British soap opera opposed the idealism of the American dreamthat characterised US drama, making regionalism a central part in their story lines.Coronation Street was the first of these, set in Manchester, in a working-class suburb,the 1950s soap was largely a product of the ‘angry young men’ movement of thatera, painting a gritty picture of everyday life through ‘kitchen-sink’ style observationaldrama. In stark contrast, American soaps force-fed viewers a morally righteousdoctrine, and often featured the flamboyant life of high-rolling oil tycoons and the trials ofa broken-home due to a torrid affair with a dapper young doctor. Both UK and US dramastill managed to include endless snippets of overly drawn out emotional moments,usually where one participant in the conversation would turn to face an inanimate objectand offer up sentiments of either regret, fear or wistfulness.The structure was perfect for those watching whilst tending to housework, or frequentlytoo tired to concentrate on in-depth storylines. Dialogue was the driving force andstorylines themselves never ended, as there was always room for new characters to24
eplace stale or dead ones. It was just like real life, an often repetitive state of monotony, albeitwith a few surprises thrown in. Soaps became regular fixtures of many women’s lives, oneswho were forced to the ‘kitchen’ and denied equal access to education, but held a glowingyearning to learn more about life outside their four walls. Soap operas gave ‘domesticated’women access to this ‘other world’, and a glimpse into how life could be. Tragic narratives ofcharacters they could easily relate to gave relief and <strong>com</strong>fort to battered wives and ignoredspouses, appealing to this with poor social skills, unable to express their own pain and sufferingfrom a domesticated life of bullying and abuse. With this, a stronger female identity was born,far removed from the submissive roles of women in the previous generation of entertainment.Whilst the works of Virginia Woolf and Germaine Greer might have been lost on many of thehousewives, these ‘role plays’ allowed for women to expect more in life and gave an examplefor them to follow. Indeed, it was the progression of soap storylines that was to be one of thegreatest contributing factors for women’s rights in many nations. That’s more than any singlefeminist intellectual could ever claim. More and more, women went out to work, enrolled inuniversities and began to lead their own lives, taking <strong>com</strong>fort and direction from their favouriteSoap stars onscreen lives.In Brazil, where soaps are something of an institution, the society has experienced rapiddevelopments, which many attribute to the increased access to television sets and thereforesoap operas. There are between 60 and 80 million regular viewers of evening soaps in Brazil25