Drought Management Planning at Ute Reservoir, Quay County, NM

More documents

Recommendations

Info

3810TQCRWAMin inflow 10-‐Yr 10-‐Yr b380037903780Max Compact Storage 3784Spillway 37873770376037503740373037203710Original Spillway 3760Conservation Pool 3741.6CONSEQUENCE MODELING scenarios 3700444.48431.4418.33405.26392.18379.11366.04352.97339.89326.82313.75300.67
EVALUATION OF CONSEQUENCES Table 4.1 -‐ AlternaAve trigger points, delivery reducAons and impacts.Firm, Fixed Pool Status Quo Tucumcari/Quay Minimum Inflow 90% Inflow Stage 1 trigger (feet asl) N/A N/A 3779 3776 3771 Stage 1 reducAon N/A N/A 20% 10% 10% Stage 2 trigger (feet asl) N/A N/A 3772 3773 3768 Stage 2 reducAon N/A N/A 50% 20% 20% Stage 3 trigger (feet asl) N/A N/A 3767 3770 3766 Stage 3 reducAon N/A N/A 90% 30% 30% Average storage (acre-‐c/y) 140,712 124,012 147,064 136,637 133,093 Average yield (acre-‐c/y) 19,908 23,462 17,384 20,643 21,661 Average ENMWUA Deficit (acre-‐c/y) 2,805 369 4,535 2,301 1,603 Amount Released (acre-‐c/40 y) 846,600 740,739 966,973 804,731 770,730 Median ElevaAon (c, asl) 3,776 3,773 3,777 3,775 3,775
Page 1 and 2: Drought Management Planning at U
Page 3 and 4: BASIS of PLAN Evaluate the fair
Page 5 and 6: FORMATION OF ALTERNATIVES 1. Stat
Page 7 and 8: CONSEQUENCE MODELING - model for
Page 9 and 10: CONSEQUENCE MODELING - base data
Page 11 and 12: 140000120000100000CONSEQUENCE MODEL
Page 13: 3790Max Storage337803770237603750C
Page 17 and 18: UTE RESERVOIR DROUGHT MANAGEMENT

Drought Management Planning at Ute Reservoir, Quay County, NM

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?