Mr. Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali Mr. Justice Mian Saqib Nisar M

Const. Petition No.127 of 2012 21convention rights is stated in terms, such an impossibility willarise.12. At this stage, Mr. Rafique Rijwana, learned ASC, who isrepresenting honourable retired Justice Shah Abdul Rasheed inthese proceedings, made his submissions. He gave relevant datesof his appointment and retirement to show that at the time ofretirement on 11.2.1986, he had served as a judge of the HighCourt for 04-years, 07-months and 05-days. He did not advanceany further arguments except adopting the arguments of SyedIftikhar Hussain Gillani, learned senior ASC, who has alreadymade his submission in this case, as noted above.13. Mr. Hamid Khan, learned Sr. ASC, who is representingseven honourable retired judges of the High Court, at thecommencement of his submissions, made reference to the materialplaced on record by him alongwith C.M.As No.847 to 853 of 2013to give details regarding the service of each of the honourableretired judges represented by him, so as to show their actuallength of service as judges of the High Court. For the purpose ofclearity in his arguments, he divided the honourable retired judgesrepresented by him into two categories i.e. Rana MuhammadArshad Khan and Muhammad Jehangir Arshad, two honourableretired judges, who were elevated to the Bench from the bar andthe remaining five retired judges, who before their elevation, hadrendered about thirty years service in the District judiciary indifferent capacities. Details of these honourable retired judges andother judges in similar position, regarding service rendered bythem, is being provided in the judgment separately in the form of achart.