12.07.2015 Views

ON GENERALIZED STIRLING NUMBERS AND POLYNOMIALS

ON GENERALIZED STIRLING NUMBERS AND POLYNOMIALS

ON GENERALIZED STIRLING NUMBERS AND POLYNOMIALS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4. EXPLICIT EXPRESSI<strong>ON</strong>S FORS (α) (n, k, r) <strong>AND</strong> S (α,λ) (n, k, r)In this section we use the results from Cakić [1](see Theorem 4. and commentby L.Carlitz) and Milovanović and Cakić [10] (see Theorem 3.)Applying Carlitz’s [2] extension of a result of Wang [20], Singh Chandel andDwivedi [16] proved the following explicit formula for S (0,λ) (n, k, r) :S (0,λ) (n, k, r) = n! ∑ k∏ r (λ−1,i l),k!ii 1 +···+i k =n l=1 l !where i s > 0.In this section we prove the theorem about new explicit expressions fornumbers S (α) (n, k, r) and S (α,λ) (n, k, r).Theorem: We have(14)and(15)S (α) (n, k, r) = r n ∑ ( )α/r n−1( )∏ α/r + s − Ss,i 0 is=1 sS (α,λ) (n, k, r) = r n ∑ ( )α/r n−1( )∏ α/r + s(λ−1r+ 1) − S si 0 is=1 swhere S s = ∑ s−1t=0 i t. The summation on the right in above sums is over alli 0 , . . . , i n−1 ∈ {0, 1} such that i 0 + i 1 + · · · + i n−1 = n − k.P r o o f:Introduce the notations( )α/rn−2( )∏ α/r + s − SsA(i 0 , . . . , i n−2 ) =,i 0 is=1 sandB(i 0 , . . . , i n−2 ) =( )α/rn−2( )∏ α/r + s(λ−1r+ 1) − S s.i 0 is=1 sFor i n−1 ∈ {0, 1} we get from (14) and (15), respectively:S (α) (n, k, r) = r n∑S n−1 =(n−1)−(k−1)r n (α/r + n − 1 − (n − k − 1))5A(i 0 , . . . , i n−2 )+∑S n−1 =(n−1)−kA(i 0 , . . . , i n−2 ),

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!