Rogers Communications Inc., Rogers Wireless Partnership ... - Slaw

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Interpretation - General principles - International convention - Effect of - [See seventhCopyright - Topic 3].Treaties - Topic 1606Operation and effect - Domestic or internal consequences - [See seventh Copyright -Topic 3].Words and PhrasesTo the public - The Supreme Court of Canada discussed the meaning of these words asthey were used in the phrase "communicate the work to the public bytelecommunication" in s. 3(1)(f) of the Copyright Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42 - Seeparagraphs 2 to 57.Cases Noticed:Entertainment Software Association et al. v. Society of Composers, Authors and MusicPublishers of Canada, [2011] N.R. TBEd. JL.021; 2012 SCC 34, refd to. [paras. 2,74].CCH Canadian Ltd. et al. v. Law Society of Upper Canada, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 339; 317N.R. 107; 2004 SCC 13, reversing (2002), 289 N.R. 1; 18 C.P.R.(4th) 161; 2002FCA 187, reversing [2000] 2 F.C. 451; 169 F.T.R. 1, dist. [para. 2].SOCAN Statement of Royalties, Public Performance of Musical Works 1996, 1997, 1998(Tariff 22, Internet), Re (1999), 1 C.P.R. (4th) 417, refd to. [para. 6].Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada v. Canadian Associationof Internet Providers et al., [2004] 2 S.C.R. 427; 322 N.R. 306; 2004 SCC 45, refdto. [paras. 6, 60].New Brunswick (Board of Management) v. Dunsmuir, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 190; 372 N.R. 1;329 N.B.R.(2d) 1; 844 A.P.R. 1; 291 D.L.R.(4th) 577; 2008 SCC 9, refd to.[paras. 11, 60].Canada (Attorney General) v. Mowat, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 471; 422 N.R. 248; 2011 SCC 53,refd to. [paras. 11, 72].Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission) v. Canada (Attorney General) - seeCanada (Attorney General) v. Mowat.Alliance Pipeline Ltd. v. Smith, [2011] 1 S.C.R. 160; 412 N.R. 66; 2011 SCC 7, refd to.[paras. 11, 69].Alberta Teachers' Association v. Information and Privacy Commissioner (Alta.) et al.,[2011] 3 S.C.R. 654; 424 N.R. 70; 519 A.R. 1; 539 W.A.C. 1; 339 D.L.R.(4th)428; 2011 SCC 61, refd to. [paras. 11, 61].Housen v. Nikolaisen et al., [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235; 286 N.R. 1; 219 Sask.R. 1; 272 W.A.C.1; 2002 SCC 33, refd to. [paras. 13, 75].Canadian Wireless Telecommunications Assoc. et al. v. Society of Composers, Authorsand Music Publishers of Canada, [2008] 3 F.C.R. 539; 371 N.R. 272; 290 D.L.R.(4th) 753; 2008 FCA 6, refd to. [para. 31].Composers, Authors and Publishers Assoc. of Canada Ltd. v. CTV Television NetworkLtd., [1968] S.C.R. 676, refd to. [para. 36].Canadian Admiral Corp. v. Rediffusion, Inc., [1954] Ex. C.R. 382, refd to. [para. 36].Apple Computer Inc. et al. v. Mackintosh Computers Ltd. et al. (No. 1), [1987] 1 F.C.
173; 3 F.T.R. 118 (T.D.), affd. [1988] 1 F.C. 673; 81 N.R. 3 (F.C.A.), affd. [1990]2 S.C.R. 209; 110 N.R. 66, refd to. [para. 39].Robertson v. Thomson Corp. et al., [2006] 2 S.C.R. 363; 353 N.R. 104; 217 O.A.C. 332;2006 SCC 43, refd to. [para. 39].Théberge v. Galerie d'Art du Petit Champlain inc. et al., [2002] 2 S.C.R. 336; 285 N.R.267; 2002 SCC 34, refd to. [para. 40].Cartoon Network v. CSC Holdings, Inc. (2008), 536 F.3d 121, not folld. [para. 50].Blue Crest Music Inc. et al. v. Compo Co., [1980] 1 S.C.R. 357; 29 N.R. 296, refd to.[para. 51].Khosa v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2009] 1 S.C.R. 339; 385N.R. 206; 2009 SCC 12, refd to. [para. 64].Chamberlain Group Inc. v. Lynx Industries Inc. (2010), 379 F.T.R. 270; 2010 FC 1287,refd to. [para. 71].Alticor Inc. et al. v. Nutravite Pharmaceuticals Inc. (2005), 339 N.R. 56; 257 D.L.R.(4th)60; 2005 FCA 269, refd to. [para. 71].Molson Breweries, A Partnership v. Labatt (John) Ltd. et al., [2000] 3 F.C. 145; 252 N.R.91 (F.C.A.), refd to. [para. 71].Doré v. Barreau du Québec (2012), 428 N.R. 146; 2012 SCC 12, refd to. [para. 73].Carrier Sekani Tribal Council v. British Columbia Utilities Commission et al., [2010] 2S.C.R. 650; 406 N.R. 333; 293 B.C.A.C. 175; 496 W.A.C. 175; 2010 SCC 43,refd to. [para. 77].Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. v. Carrier Sekani Tribal Council - see Carrier Sekani Tribal Councilv. British Columbia Utilities Commission et al.Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. Canada Labour Relations Board et al., [1995] 1 S.C.R.157; 177 N.R. 1, refd to. [para. 78].Ryan v. Law Society of New Brunswick, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 247; 302 N.R. 1; 257 N.B.R.(2d) 207; 674 A.P.R. 207; 2003 SCC 20, refd to. [para. 79].Newfoundland and Labrador Nurses' Union v. Newfoundland and Labrador (TreasuryBoard) et al. (2011), 317 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 340; 986 A.P.R. 340; 424 N.R. 220;2011 SCC 62, refd to. [para. 79].Toronto (City) v. Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 79 et al., [2003] 3 S.C.R.77; 311 N.R. 201; 179 O.A.C. 291; 2003 SCC 63, refd to. [para. 81].VIA Rail Canada Inc. v. Canadian Transportation Agency et al., [2007] 1 S.C.R. 650; 360N.R. 1; 2007 SCC 15, refd to. [para. 82].Mattel Inc. v. 3894207 Canada Inc. et al., [2006] 1 S.C.R. 772; 348 N.R. 340; 2006 SCC22, refd to. [para. 83].Bell v. Ontario Human Rights Commission, [1971] S.C.R. 756, refd to. [para. 87].Halifax (Regional Municipality) v. Human Rights Commission (N.S.) et al. (2012), 428N.R. 107; 316 N.S.R.(2d) 1; 1002 A.P.R. 1; 2012 SCC 10, refd to. [para. 87].Statutes Noticed:Administrative Tribunals Act, S.B.C. 2004, c. 45, generally [para. 77].Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, 828 U.N.T.S. 221,art. 11 [para. 36].Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, S.C. 1988, c. 65, sect.61, sect. 62 [para. 37].
Page 3 and 4: Administrative Law - Topic 9103Boar
Page 5 and 6: dramatic, musical or artistic work,
Page 7: a later point - The court held that
Page 11 and 12: Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet
Page 13 and 14: presumption of home statute deferen
Page 15 and 16: normally attract a deferential stan
Page 17 and 18: whether the members of the public r
Page 19 and 20: Copyright - Topic 3440Fees, charges
Page 21: paragraphs 50 and 51.Statutes - Top

Rogers Communications Inc., Rogers Wireless Partnership ... - Slaw

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?