12.07.2015 Views

Paul Reading Maurice Curtis, Andrew Naylor, Richard Faull ... - ACNR

Paul Reading Maurice Curtis, Andrew Naylor, Richard Faull ... - ACNR

Paul Reading Maurice Curtis, Andrew Naylor, Richard Faull ... - ACNR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Neurophysiology Articleresults of SPES from 125 consecutive patientsevaluated with intracranial recordingsbetween 1999 and 2006.Experimental protocolSPES was performed between adjacent electrodeswith a constant-current neurostimulator(Medelec ST10 Sensor, OxfordInstruments) using monophasic single pulsesof 1ms duration and current intensity rangingbetween 4mA and 8mA (4mA was mostoften used). A single pulse was deliveredevery 5-10s and EEG responses to each pulsewere recorded by the electrodes not used forstimulation. At least ten pulses were appliedto each intracranial electrode. In eachpatient, all available electrodes located ingrey matter were used to stimulate.SPES responsesTwo main groups of cortical responses weregenerated by SPES:1) Early responses (ER): Responses resemblingsingle sharp-and-slow waves followingthe stimulus artefact, sometimes associatedwith a low amplitude sharp wavewith a fixed latency. ER can be consideredas responses of normal cortex to stimulation(Figure 1).2) Late responses (LR): cortical responsesseen in some areas after the initial ER.Two different types of LR were seen:2.a) Delayed responses (DR): responsesresembling spikes or sharp waves occurringbetween 100 milliseconds and onesecond after stimulation (Figure 1). DRwere not always seen after every identicalstimulus and their latency is alwaysvariable after each stimulus. DR wereseen when stimulating temporal andextratemporal structures.2.b) Repetitive responses (RR): two or moreconsecutive sharp-and-slow-wave complexes,each resembling the initial earlyresponse (Figure 2). RR were mainly seenwhen stimulating frontal structures.Among the 125 patients, 93 had shown lateresponses to SPES, 84 had exclusively DR,five had exclusively RR, and four patients hadboth DR and RR (Table 1).Relation between late responses toSPES and seizure onsetApart from early responses, DR were themost commonly observed responses to SPES.The relation between the topography of DRand ictal onset zone can be seen in Table 2.The ictal onset zone was defined as the regionwhere the initial ictal changes were seen inintracranial recordings. Ictal onset zone wasclassified as focal (involving less than threecontiguous electrodes), regional (involvingthree or more contiguous electrodes on onehemisphere), diffuse (involving most electrodesbilaterally), or bilateral independent(different focal seizures starting on differenthemispheres). Among the 83 patients withDR and seizures during telemetry, 70 showedDR exclusively within the ictal onset zone(Figure 3), 10 showed DR within and outsidethe ictal onset zone, and only three showedFigure 1: Early and Delayed responses to SPESA: Frontal radiograph showing implanted subdural subtemporal strips in a patient with left temporal lobe epilepsy. All thecontacts of the subdural strips are highlighted. B: Intracranial recordings of early and delayed responses to SPES. Delayedresponses were seen at electrode 1 of left subtemporal strip (LsT1, marked as green) when stimulating through electrodes 5and 6 of same strip (LsT5 and LsT6, marked as red). Early responses were mainly seen at electrodes 3, 4, 7, and 8 of samestrip. Electrode 1 was the most distal electrode to the insertion burr hole and closest to mesial temporal structures.Recording displayed in common reference to Pz.Arrow=electrical stimulation; RsT=right subtemporal strip; LsT=left subtemporal strip; ER=early response; DR=delayedresponse.Figure 2: Repetitive responses to SPESA: Frontal radiograph showing implanted intracerebral (depth) electrode bundles. B: Intracranial recordings of early andrepetitive responses to SPES. Repetitive responses were evident when stimulating through electrodes 1 and 2 of the leftposterior frontal electrode bundle (LpF1 and LpF2, marked as red). Electrode 1 was the most distal electrode to the insertionburr hole and closest to medial frontal structures. Recording displayed in common reference to Pz.Arrow=electrical stimulation; RapF=right anterior polar frontal; RmF=right mid frontal; LmF=left mid frontal; LpF=leftposterior frontal; LaF=left anterior frontal; Lorb=left orbitofrontal; Lpcing=left posterior cingulate; Lacing=left anteriorcingulate; ER=early response; DR=delayed response.DR exclusively outside the ictal onset zone.Moreover, the vast majority of patients (27/30)without DR did not have a focal onset, probablyimplying that the electrodes were not incontact with the area of origin for the seizures(Table 1). Therefore, DR appear to be associatedwith the ictal onset zone and can be consideredas a reliable marker of epileptogenicity.In a further study of 30 patients with frontalintracranial electrodes, RR and/or frontal DRwere seen exclusively in patients with frontalseizure onset. 5 The best match between seizure<strong>ACNR</strong> • VOLUME 8 NUMBER 1 • MARCH/APRIL 2008 I 15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!