Medlar Comfits, 2007. Author: Anna - Calodema

More documents

Recommendations

Info

September 2006August 2006July 2006June 2006May 2006April 2006March 2006February 2006January 2006December 2005O T H E R F E A S T S - A B I T O F T H I S , AB I T O F T H A TA Blog Around the ClockAbnormal InterestsAds Without ProductsThe Annotated BudakBibliophile StalkerButner BlogspotAhar: Pleasure and SustenanceAmple SanityAshbury's AuberginesBibliOdysseyBitter LemonsBooks, Inq.Book View CafeBrisbane Insects and Spiders DailyBurning SiloChiZineCriminal EnglishDaniel Franklin's ReviewsDispatches from the Culture WarsEdgeEffect MeasureErrantryEvolving ThoughtsForms Most BeautifulGreedy SpaceGeorge Bristow's Secret Freezerreviewed. The last paper of mine (the Manwell letters) was reviewedby 6 (yes, six!) people, including an well-known academic fromWollongong University in New South Wales, a solicitor from NewSouth Wales, an expert witness who is a crocodile scientist and threeother biologists in three States - Western Australia, New South Walesand Victoria. Some of the Calodema papers do not require anyextensive review as they are basically referrals to overlooked researchetc. Over 200 papers have been published so far in Calodema andthere are many in press. The published research in Calodema has beenaccepted by most biologists throughout the world although there isalways a little clique who don't like other scientists and who (forvested interests and the guilt of their own unproductivity) will nit pickand put out excuses about the publication of others works. Many ofthe papers in Calodema have been cited favourably in the works ofothers. See e.g. referred papers on my website (which will be updatedsoon).As regards personal letters and comments, all good journals should dothis as it stimulates thought and eliminates interior bias in refereeingand control by those editorial panels.Glatz believes that Calodema is a “boys own annual”- well that goes forevery other journal in the world that is specialised and uses referees toweed out competition from rival scientists and papers that are inconflict with their own views or restricted scope of their particularjournal. Most of the Calodema papers are available as free pdf filesfrom the www.calodema.com.I have been undertaking research in this country and overseas since1965 and have published over 410 papers and 3 books. The fact thatGlatz hasn’t heard or seen works published by me shows just howignorant he is! One of my books (Host plants of Chrysomelidae of theWorld with Dr P Jolivet of France) has been cited over 150 times. Myspider book (Spiders of Australia) saved the life of a person inWestern Australia when they were able to positively identify a spidershown in a great colour photograph and thereby get the correcttreatment. MY papers have appeared in renowned entomological andbotanical journals all over the world. Some of the research has beenutilized by the USA Defence Department and the USA AgriculturalDepartments. It should be noted that Glatz is in his early twenties andhas published (since 2003 - 7 years) about 16 papers onmolecules/genes of blowflies and other lower creatures. Each of hispapers have been written with many other authors - one of them has14 authors, thereby one cannot deduce Glatz's input into such works!.In contrast, most of my papers have been written by myself.(part 2 below in next blog entry)14 MARCH 2010 12:22 PM
Giornale NuovoFood and WhiningFrankenstein Journalfrom Archaea to ZeaxantholGernot Katzer's Spice PagesIdea JugglersThe Inferior 4+1Jivha for IngredientsLanguage LogGrrl ScientistMaking LightMike's PrattleThe ModulatorThe MumpsimusLibrary AngstNaturalist NotebookThe Panda's ThumbPencil and LeafPhasmatodeaRigor VitaePopcorn & Chain mailResearch at a Snail's PaceSnark HuntingSailu's KitchenStreet Anatomy - Anatomy in ArtPharyngulaPoem du JourTalking SquidTechnofettishistThoughts from KansasWords and PicturesDr TJ Hawkeswood said...(Continued from above blog entry)Incidentally at the same time as my journal (and all of irs writers?) isbeing criticised, the great Edward O Wilson from Harvard Universityis being criticised by underlings like Glatz in the USA and elsewherewho don't have the right to criticize and should know better. Thecritics are also young people who are apparently jealous of theachievements and public exposure of the likes of older men suchWilson and myself and whio are very disrespectful. The clue to theirjealousy is given for example in Glatz’s heated diatribe in this blog: (a)in his statement re. true scientific advances are rarely achieved byindividuals and (b) the statement regarding hard working people whoare subject to the (blah blah).... get NO recognition (!). Poor Glatzwants recognition but nobody out there is really interested in hisboring (but expensive and taxpayer funded) research on flies! Boo hoo!Glatz is also incorrect when he states that I have many enemies. Ibelieve I have many more friends than enemies, but this is not whatscience should be all about. This Glatz statement is merely smear yetagainSuffice to say, overall I regard Glatz’s moanings as rubbish, whichshlould be relegated to the dustbin of history. If he doesn’t liketaxonomists and field workers (which is very apparent in hisramblings both on this blog and in others), my advice for him is to gojoin a cooking or sewing class and get out of science altogether, as heoffends not only me but thousands of other scientists (entomologists,ecologists, taxonomists) who publish in journals which he wouldregard as lowly and not worth publishing in. Science for him and hismates appears only to be elitist. My science is for everyone.And I am not scared to show myself. Those that criticise me and E.O.Wilson are cowards of the lowest order who hide behind anonymity(viz. “Marek’”, “R”, etc. etc).Calodema and the website will continue while I am alive and I hope tobe around for another 30 years at least. So there!A F E W P O R T A L S A N D A C I R C U SRadio CasablancaTree of LifeThe A to Z Journal of MaterialsAsimov's Science FictionArts & Letters DailyCulinary History NetworkIf anyone like Glatz has any complaints against any Calodema paper,they are free to publish a rebuttal or corrections. But at this stage, noone has sent me any such papers for publication.Dr Trevor J. Hawkeswoodwww.calodema.comPS. Over 5,000 pdf files have been downloaded from the Calodemawebsite already this year. Can Glatz, the “molecule molester” equalthis?
Page 1 and 2: Report Abuse Next Blog»Create Blog
Page 4 and 5: For anyone interested in Dr Hawkesw
Page 8 and 9: Culinary History NetworkDouble-Tong
Page 10 and 11: S O M E C R E A T I V E T Y P E S(
Page 12: The Sunshine ProjectTheocracy Watch

Medlar Comfits, 2007. Author: Anna - Calodema

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?