M. Kellerhals et al.on antioxidant composition as a guide to parental selection. In<strong>for</strong>mation isbe<strong>in</strong>g gathered on phenols <strong>and</strong> flavonols to benefit postharvest physiologystudies. Data on the compositional diversity <strong>of</strong> <strong>apple</strong> germplasm is reta<strong>in</strong>ed toaid medical epidemiological <strong>and</strong> dietary <strong>in</strong>tervention studies, as well asidentify bioextracts <strong>for</strong> supplemental application. Fruit will be collected fromthe designated core collection at Geneva, NY, from wild <strong>apple</strong>s recentlycollected <strong>in</strong> Central Asia, <strong>and</strong> from <strong>apple</strong> trees <strong>in</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> M<strong>in</strong>nesotagermplasm collection.Cultivation strategies% Fruit scab706050403020100Golden mono Go/Re Go/Pi/El Go/Re/Ar199719992000Figure 1. Effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>apple</strong> cultivar mixtures on scab <strong>in</strong>cidence on <strong>fruit</strong> at harvest <strong>of</strong>Golden Delicious (Go/Re = ‘Golden’, ‘Rewena’, Go/Pi/El = ‘Golden’, ‘P<strong>in</strong>ova’,‘Elstar’, Go/Re/Ar = ‘Golden’, ‘Rewena’, ‘Ariwa’)Modern agriculture has lead to monocultural production. Monoculturesare crops <strong>of</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle species <strong>and</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle variety (Phillips <strong>and</strong> Wolfe, 2004).Durability <strong>of</strong> resistance is greatly <strong>in</strong>fluenced by its management <strong>and</strong> one <strong>of</strong>the most conv<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g systems is based on the concept <strong>of</strong> mixtures (Blaise <strong>and</strong>Gessler, 1994). The aim <strong>of</strong> a research conducted at Agroscope FAWWädenswil <strong>in</strong> collaboration with ETH Zürich was to f<strong>in</strong>d out if <strong>apple</strong> cultivarmixtures can reduce the severity <strong>of</strong> the most harmful <strong>apple</strong> disease scab.Moreover, effects on powdery mildew, pests <strong>and</strong> on economy were<strong>in</strong>vestigated (Kellerhals et al., 2003). Virulence differences among pathotypes<strong>of</strong> the scab fungus V. <strong>in</strong>aequalis <strong>of</strong>fer possibilities <strong>for</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> host diversity58J. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res. Special ed. vol. 12, 2004: 5362
<strong>Use</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>genetic</strong> <strong>resources</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>apple</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g….as a component <strong>of</strong> disease management. Based on computer simulations,Blaise <strong>and</strong> Gessler (1994) suggested that <strong>apple</strong> cultivar mixtures would leadto a reduction <strong>of</strong> scab epidemics. This hypothesis was tested <strong>in</strong> an orchard.Treewise mixture <strong>of</strong> three different scab susceptible cultivars (‘Elstar’,‘P<strong>in</strong>ova’, ‘Golden Delicious’) significantly reduced scab epidemics on‘Golden Delicious’ compared to the pure st<strong>and</strong> (Fig. 1). Economically thecultivar mixture causes higher labour <strong>in</strong>put which can be partly compensatedby reduced cost <strong>for</strong> plant protection. Due to economical reasons, cultivarmixtures <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g cultivars derived from <strong>genetic</strong> <strong>resources</strong>, can there<strong>for</strong>e notbe generally recommended as a method <strong>for</strong> improved disease management.However, <strong>in</strong> particular market situations, if cash flow perspectives (price xquantity) with regard to production costs are favourable or under specificregulations such as organic production, cultivar mixtures may well bea possibility <strong>for</strong> more susta<strong>in</strong>able grow<strong>in</strong>g systems.Components <strong>of</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>able systemsSusta<strong>in</strong>ability is address<strong>in</strong>g economical, ecological <strong>and</strong> social aspects.For agriculture <strong>and</strong> horticulture, susta<strong>in</strong>ability has been conceptualised more<strong>in</strong> detail <strong>for</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g able to better address critical issues (e.g. Pretty, 1999;Zachariasse, 2004). The availability <strong>of</strong> disease <strong>and</strong> pest resistant cultivars hasbeen identified as a critical bottleneck <strong>for</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g susta<strong>in</strong>able horticulturalsystems <strong>in</strong> the 21 st century possible (Bertsch<strong>in</strong>ger et al., 2004a). The directeduse <strong>of</strong> <strong>genetic</strong> <strong>resources</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>genetic</strong> <strong>apple</strong> improvement programmes couldaddress many components <strong>of</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>able <strong>apple</strong> grow<strong>in</strong>g systems. Durablydisease <strong>and</strong> pest resistant cultivars would be <strong>of</strong> particular use to organicgrow<strong>in</strong>gsystems <strong>in</strong> which pesticide application <strong>in</strong>tensity under temperateclimates is even more <strong>in</strong>tense (Bertsch<strong>in</strong>ger et al., 2004b) as compared to<strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>and</strong> conventional systems <strong>for</strong> the lack <strong>of</strong> curative pesticides.REFERENCESBertsch<strong>in</strong>ger L., Anderson J.D., de Groot N., Granatste<strong>in</strong>D., Habib R., Mull<strong>in</strong>ix K., Neilsen D., Pomares GarcíaF., Weibel F.P., Z<strong>in</strong>ati G. 2004a. Conclusions from the 1 stsymposium on susta<strong>in</strong>ability <strong>in</strong> horticulture <strong>and</strong> a declaration <strong>for</strong> the 21 st century.ACTA HORT. 638: 509512.Bertsch<strong>in</strong>ger L., Mouron P., Dolega E., Höhn H., HolligerE., Husiste<strong>in</strong> A., Schmid A., Siegfried W., Widmer A.,Zürcher M., Weibel F. 2004b. Ecological <strong>apple</strong> production:a comparison <strong>of</strong> organic <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>apple</strong>grow<strong>in</strong>g. ACTA HORT. 638: 321332, http://www.actahort.org/books/638/638_43.htmJ. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res. Special ed. vol. 12, 2004: 5362 59