12.07.2015 Views

Wavelet basis functions in biomedical signal processing - SPAN LAB

Wavelet basis functions in biomedical signal processing - SPAN LAB

Wavelet basis functions in biomedical signal processing - SPAN LAB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

J. Rafiee et al. / Expert Systems with Applications 38 (2011) 6190–6201 6197db44Channel 1900880Evaluation Criterionx 10 62db44db44Channel 2Channel 3Evaluation Criterion860840660640620Db44 & Db45HaarForearm Pronation5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45HaarDb44 & Db45Spread F<strong>in</strong>gers15 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 4500 50 100 150 200 250 300Mother wavelet <strong>functions</strong>Fig. 13. Trend of Daubechies family vs. evaluation criterion <strong>in</strong> Intramuscular EMG<strong>signal</strong>s for two motions.Fig. 11. Evaluation criterion (no unit) across 324 mother wavelet candidates forEEG <strong>signal</strong>s across three channels (Pz, POz, Oz).Evaluation Criterion21.510.5x 10 7db45Haardb44shan0.2-0.1shan0.1-0.1cmor3-0.1cmor4-0.1fbsp1-0.1-0.1shan0.5-0.1fbsp3-0.1-0.1fbsp2-0.1-0.1fbsp1-0.2-0.1fbsp2-0.2-0.1fbsp3-0.2-0.1bior3.1gaus1cgau1rbio3.1Evaluation Criterion80007000600050004000300020001000db45db44cmor1-0.01two motionsshan0.2-0.1dmeymeyrcmor1-0.1cmor4-0.1shan0.5-0.1fbsp1-0.2-0.1shan5-0.2shan1-0.4 fbsp3-0.2-0.9fbsp3-0.2-0.1fbsp2-0.2-0.1fbsp1-0.2-0.2cmor1-1.5fbsp3-0.1-0.1rbio5-5fbsp2-0.1-0.1fbsp1-0.1-0.1 bior3-100 50 100 150 200 250 300Mother wavelet <strong>functions</strong>Fig. 12. Evaluation criterion (no unit) vs. mother wavelets for VPA <strong>signal</strong>s recordedfrom one subject.Intramuscular EMG <strong>signal</strong>s. As shown, the EC <strong>in</strong>creases slightly <strong>in</strong>low-order db and decreases slightly for high-order db. This demonstratesthat Daubechies <strong>functions</strong> do not behave dramatically differenton the bio<strong>signal</strong>s, while rang<strong>in</strong>g from db1 to db43. It alsohighlights the likely limitation of the mostly lower order Daubechiesthat typically are used <strong>in</strong> prior research. The trend changesdramatically for db44, which cannot be seen <strong>in</strong> Fig. 13 due to scal<strong>in</strong>grestrictions.db44 and db45 are the most similar <strong>functions</strong> as the other 322<strong>functions</strong> have pronouncedly poorer performance (similarity).Closer exam<strong>in</strong>ation of the evaluation criterion (see Figs. 12 and14) for VPA and <strong>in</strong>tramuscular EMG reveals some variability of fitamongst other function families. To demonstrate the difference betweendb44 and the other <strong>functions</strong>, the cont<strong>in</strong>uous wavelet coefficientsof one of the segmented unit <strong>signal</strong>s us<strong>in</strong>g db44 has been0Mother wavelet <strong>functions</strong>Fig. 14. Evaluation criterion (no unit) vs. mother wavelets for <strong>in</strong>tramuscular EMG<strong>signal</strong>s recorded from one of the six channels of data acquisition system.compared to those calculated with the Morlet function, whichhas been used frequently <strong>in</strong> previous research (see Figs. 15 and16, see Fig. 17 for decomposition scale) (e.g. Saravanan, KumarSiddabattuni, & Ramachandran, 2008). The difference betweenthe values of the CWC (Y-axis) calculated by db44 is much higherthan those calculated by Morlet function. Moreover, periodic s<strong>in</strong>usoidaltrends also are obvious us<strong>in</strong>g the db44. This is a very desirablefeature, because it means that periodic behavior can beextracted from biological <strong>signal</strong>s us<strong>in</strong>g db44 function. This mightbe useful for preprocess<strong>in</strong>g biological <strong>signal</strong>s.Some other complex mother wavelets (<strong>in</strong> addition to db44 anddb45) show high similarity to EEG and VPA <strong>signal</strong>s (e.g. see Fig. 12).After db44 and db45, EEG <strong>signal</strong>s also display some similarity tobior 3.1 and other complex mother wavelets unlike the EMG. However,these differences appear m<strong>in</strong>or and appear due mostly tocomplex <strong>functions</strong> with different wavelet center frequency. Thecenter frequency varies simply with the frequency contents ofthe <strong>signal</strong>s.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!