40(Continued from page 39)duties, more than they were consciousand preoccupied with theirrights. They understood and werecommitted to the fact that althoughthey were fighting for democracy toprevail in their society, there couldnever be democracy in the military assuch. They were committed to thefact that the military was and mustalways be autocratic in nature if itis to survive as a credible anddisciplined force to fight warsfor the country.They were conscious <strong>of</strong> the factthat theirs was a business involvingthe possible supreme sacrifice <strong>of</strong> theirmost treasured possession, which waslife. They were also conscious <strong>of</strong> theadverse consequences <strong>of</strong> a lack <strong>of</strong>discipline, as that could involve littlemetal balls meant to break humanbones and terminate treasured humanlife. They were also very aware thatdiscipline in the military was shapedand nurtured on the parade groundthrough pride in drilling.True factsIt is also true that the SANDF isfacing the real effects <strong>of</strong> elements <strong>of</strong>the Non-statutory Forces that do nottruly originate from the "ParadeGround", in the true sense <strong>of</strong> theword. (Refer to SA SOLDIER, Vol 10No 9, Part II, par 3, p 34, Attention allWarrant Officers <strong>of</strong> the Army byMaj Gen J. Jooste for a definition <strong>of</strong> aparade ground.) These membershave, however, never been regardedas second-class soldiers by theirrespective Non-statutory Forces. Thetruth is that they were trained eitheras individuals or small groups in andout <strong>of</strong> the country for differentmissions, such as the following:intelligence collection, sabotage,mass mobilisation, couriers andsmall groups <strong>of</strong> strike units.These elements were trainedeither in safe houses or in militarybases in the bush, but isolated fromthe rest <strong>of</strong> the Full-time soldiers. Thiswas for security reasons as they wereto operate behind enemy lines andthen return to their normal civilianenvironment in a short space <strong>of</strong> time,without raising any suspicions.It is true that when the memberswere integrated into a Full-timeRegular Force, this aspect became animmense challenge. These wereindeed genuine combatants who hadnever gone through the intense,rigorous and difficult part <strong>of</strong> beingtrained as an obedient soldier, withthe element <strong>of</strong> selfish consciousnesseradicated from the mind.I personally equate this with thetype <strong>of</strong> what I regard as would-behalf-baked soldiers through the wellintended outcome based curricula weintend to introduce to the SANDFtraining institutions today. These tome sound dynamic and cost-effectiveas they are presented with very obviousgood intentions by the authors,but it seems as if we negate one mostcrucial fact, namely that we have toshape a soldier who is psychologicallyfit for tough and deadly combat.We even negate the fact that some <strong>of</strong>the recipients <strong>of</strong> these courses are justraw civilians recruited as pr<strong>of</strong>essionalsfrom the civilian ranks to joinmilitary <strong>of</strong>ficer ranks and are thusrequired to be involved laterin operations.The only difference between thetwo is that the initial group wouldgenerally be more disciplined andcommitted, as it is a direct product <strong>of</strong>underground structures trained duringwar. This is also meant to send acaution to the SANDF authorities atall levels, that in correcting whateverwrongs get done in the process <strong>of</strong>work, including possible abuses <strong>of</strong>power, not to lose sight <strong>of</strong> the mainreason for our existence as a militaryforce. This also goes to the lawmakers,including legislators <strong>of</strong> this country,to be sober and mindful <strong>of</strong> theirintentions to retain and sustain theirmilitary force. This has to be pursuedeven if it means minor amendmentsto the country's constitution that maybe used to undermine the achievement<strong>of</strong> the aim for the existence <strong>of</strong>the country's ultimate insurance,the SANDF.Not taking the soldier through theelements <strong>of</strong> the parade ground onlyproduces civilians who wear militaryuniforms and have military rank byvirtue <strong>of</strong> their intellect and association.It means wasting resources andwasted effort to train pr<strong>of</strong>essionalgunslingers with no pride and respectfor the military pr<strong>of</strong>ession. There maybe many exceptions to this, but ingeneral the gap will always show. Mycompany commander, Nome' deguarra, "Moscow", a seasoned battletested soldier from the battles <strong>of</strong>Zimbabwe at the time, once warnedus that one <strong>of</strong> the platoon 4 soldierswould easily be captured in battlebecause <strong>of</strong> his civilian ways <strong>of</strong>behaving. In fact this happened nearCacuso in Angola, on the EasternFront in 1983.This is a bitter pill to swallow andremedial action strategies by allcommanders with deep involvement<strong>of</strong> the non-commissioned <strong>of</strong>ficers areurgent and essential. This will savethe SANDF from adding to the numbers<strong>of</strong> what one would affectionatelybe referred to as "Sis', "S Sgt", "Boet","Capt, "Bro Major", "Mam'u-SgtMajor" and so on. It is amusing forme to remember that, when one wasin the camps in Angola, those whomwe regarded as behaving unsoldierlyused to be called "ama-PARTISAN",actually translated from Russianmeaning "militia". They were alsocalled "POVO", from Portuguesemeaning "just a citizen within themasses", or "ISAKHAMUZI, INTOENGENAMUMO", meaning rawdisoriented civilian/citizen tryingto play a soldier's role. In the BarneyMolokoane Main Training Centre inCaculama, 15 km from Malange, weused to pride ourselves on the factthat we enforced discipline to such anextent that we even made the treesfall in a straight line. Indeed webelieved and were committed to this.The dedication <strong>of</strong> the young <strong>of</strong>ficerseven earned them the title: "THECOMSOMOL", by their colleaguesfrom other camps who reallyappreciated the commitment andsoldierly environment.This one hopes will help providesome insight into what is probablyregarded as missing in respect <strong>of</strong>standards <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism withinthe Non-statutory Forces. I therefoream <strong>of</strong> the opinion that any commanderor authority who justifies one'sfailures to maintain and raise standardsbecause <strong>of</strong> the so-called informalways <strong>of</strong> the ex non-statutoryS A S O L D I E R • J U N E 2 0 0 4
informal ways is a "liar". The samegoes for any member <strong>of</strong> saidbackground who justifies his ownlaziness, non-performance andflabby soldiering.It must be seen as a red light if wecontinue to behave with what Iregard as "leaders busy withdrawingfrom leading" by continuing to producesoldiers who have no pride inthemselves as soldiers, irrespective <strong>of</strong>difficult challenges they may be facing.History may not be kind to us ifwe continue down this path. This situationwill go on as long as we continueto have flimsy excuses when itcomes to the commitment to pr<strong>of</strong>essionalismand military discipline inrunning our military organisation.We see them every day looking flabbyin uniform and do nothing aboutit, while there are clear regulationsintended to address this.They are at bottle stores wearinguniforms, and it is becoming normal.They are sometimes not sure whetherMeeting on cultural groundsBy Capt Corné Gründlingh,ASB Durbanto salute or not and when some do, itis as if they are pulling clothes fromthe washing line and we blame it ontheir perceived previous force culture.Their uniforms are not up to standardand we blame it on the top hierarchyand the new system <strong>of</strong> GSBs and inthis way we do not act and mostprobably do not even care. We alsosee commanders failing to respond tothe statements or requests <strong>of</strong> theirsubordinates for months on end, onlyto respond within hours when thequery comes from the union and wepostpone action again and again.We even fail to treat the matter aspure subversion, which is exactlywhat it is.We see managers who are notexpected to belong to unions in theprivate sector, but allow not only<strong>of</strong>ficers but also senior <strong>of</strong>ficers in theSANDF to become labour union <strong>of</strong>ficials,and fail to call it by its name:"conflict <strong>of</strong> interests". I suppose theyare so incorruptible that they cannotsabotage the system in order toincrease faith in the interventionmeasures <strong>of</strong> their unions and areprobably immune from falling preyto the attractions <strong>of</strong> being politicalanimals in uniform with own agendas.Who is to make this man aware<strong>of</strong> the commander's intent, the labourunion leaders?I wish to state here that, yes, it istrue that there will always be someform <strong>of</strong> abuse <strong>of</strong> power. Our historyas a military force is not immune tothis.I, however, want to caution thedecision-makers that in redressing thesituation <strong>of</strong> those abuses, we shouldnot lose sight <strong>of</strong> the fact that we haveto remain a credible military force. Iam saying, lock up the man who triesto block the system, but do not generalisethe situation. To be specific here,you cannot replace a military prosecutoror a judge with a civilian one.(Part II will be published in the July2004 edition <strong>of</strong> SA SOLDIER.)The members <strong>of</strong> Army Support BaseDurban consist <strong>of</strong> members from theprevious Natal Command, NatalCommand Maintenance Unit andNatal Command Workshops. A smallpercentage <strong>of</strong> members came fromother military units.With this background in mind,most <strong>of</strong> the members had known eachother for a number <strong>of</strong> years. It was,however, the first time that all members<strong>of</strong> Army Support Base Durbanmet on cultural grounds on19 March 2004.A Cultural Day was presentedwhere all members had the opportunityto display their culture. Each sectionhad a specific culture to represent.It was not important what cultureyou were in reality, for that dayyou were a specific culture. It then sohappened that we had white Zulus,white Indians, African and IndianBoere. Even the Chinese were represented.Cultural events presentedincluded Zulu dancing, Indiandancing, Indian instrumental musicand singing, stick fighting demonstrations,"Boeresport", such as egg run,egg throw, sack races and tug-<strong>of</strong>-war.During all these events eachsection prepared their cultural foodand enjoyed it during lunch. Theday ended in a good spirit andeveryone enjoyed the day.The knowledge gained can neverbe erased from our memories or ourhistory.J U N E 2 0 0 4 • S A S O L D I E R41