12.07.2015 Views

Bustell v. AIG Claims Service, Inc. [05/03/05] 2005 MTWCC 23

Bustell v. AIG Claims Service, Inc. [05/03/05] 2005 MTWCC 23

Bustell v. AIG Claims Service, Inc. [05/03/05] 2005 MTWCC 23

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BENEFITS RECEIVED AS OF 11/11/20<strong>03</strong>Indemnity Benefits $287,985.00Domiciliary Care $156,485.00Medical Benefits $565,743.00TOTAL $1,010,213.00Based on her estimated life expectancy, the claimant’s future entitlement as of November11, 20<strong>03</strong>, 1 was projected as follows:ESTIMATE OF FUTURE BENEFITS AS OF11/11/20<strong>03</strong>Indemnity Benefits $309,359.00Domiciliary Care $4,472,856.00Medical Benefits $1,598,400.00TOTAL $6,380,615.00Thus, as of November 11, 20<strong>03</strong>, the claimant’s estimated lifetime benefits, which includesboth the amounts already received and the estimate of her future entitlement was asfollows:ESTIMATED LIFETIME BENEFITS(Benefits already received plus estimatedfuture benefits)Indemnity Benefits $597,344.00Domiciliary Care $4,629,341.00Medical Benefits $2,164,143.001 The future estimate was provided on November 24, 20<strong>03</strong>; however, noadditional benefits had been paid as of the time of the estimate. The estimate wastherefore applicable as of November 11, 20<strong>03</strong>.Final Order Regarding Attorney Fee Award, <strong>Inc</strong>luding Apportionment to Lockhart Lien - Page 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!