Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia - Pain Resource Center
Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia - Pain Resource Center
Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia - Pain Resource Center
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Study 7 (Zwakhalen et al., 2006)Inter-rater reliabilities reported: 0.75 (rest), 0.85 (after flu vacc<strong>in</strong>e) and 0.81(patient-specific moment of potential pa<strong>in</strong>). Agreement less strong at rest thandur<strong>in</strong>g potential pa<strong>in</strong>ful activity.Study 8 (Schuler et al., 2007)Two nurses morn<strong>in</strong>g and even<strong>in</strong>g assessments: reliability= 0.80 (p=.001)Study 9 (Cohen-Mansfield & Lipson, 2008)Inter-rater agreement across three RAs: ICC=0.92Test-retest reliabilityStudy 10 (DeWaters et al., 2008)Interrater reliability between 2 master’s prepared nurse RAs for ten videovignette rat<strong>in</strong>gs: ICC= 0.98No test-retest reliability is reported.Data on test-retest and/or <strong>in</strong>tra-rater reliability reported <strong>in</strong> 3 studies.Study 3 (Costardi et al., 2006)One expert rater at basel<strong>in</strong>e and after 15 days=0.88 (p=.045)Study 7 (Zwakhalen et al., 2006)Intra-rater reliability=0.89; compar<strong>in</strong>g rat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> person with rat<strong>in</strong>g on video-Panel commentaryStudy 8 (Schuler et al., 2007)One nurses morn<strong>in</strong>g and even<strong>in</strong>g assessments; r=0.90 (p
Change language