12.07.2015 Views

Department of School Education TLg 644)1__ Haryana

Department of School Education TLg 644)1__ Haryana

Department of School Education TLg 644)1__ Haryana

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HARYANA GOVERNMENTSCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENTORDERNo. cri -- .7 /I 4-leA.cro Dated: /- -41Whereas Supreme Court <strong>of</strong> India vide its order dated 25.11.2003 directedthe CBI to investigate the matter <strong>of</strong> two sets <strong>of</strong> interview award lists prepared.for selection <strong>of</strong> JBT Teachers as a consequence <strong>of</strong> advertisement made in`Indian Express' and Dainik Tribune' on 15.11.1999 by Directorate <strong>of</strong> Primary<strong>Education</strong>, <strong>Haryana</strong> for recruiting 3206 JBT Teachers. Court <strong>of</strong> Special Judge -II (Prevention <strong>of</strong> Corruption Act) (CBI), Rohini, Delhi in the said case titled asCBI V/ s Vidya Dhar etc., CC No. 37/2010 vide its judgment dated 16.01.2013/22.01.2013 convicted Shri Ram Kumar, S/o Shri Bhana Ram, Block <strong>Education</strong>Officer, Kalayat (Kaithal) alongwith Vir Bhan Mehta and Dilbagh Singh asunder: -‘ii ".11-b)-1'‘611-1)1Offence Under Section13(2) <strong>of</strong> Prevention <strong>of</strong>Corruption Act, 1988Sentence and fineRigorous imprisonment for a period <strong>of</strong> twoyear alongwith fine <strong>of</strong> Rs.100/-.120-B IPC read withSection 418/467/471read with 13(2) <strong>of</strong>Prevention <strong>of</strong> CorruptionAct, 1988418 IPC467 IPC(c) 471 IPCRigorous imprisonment for a period <strong>of</strong> fouryears alongwith fine <strong>of</strong> Rs.100/-.Rigorous imprisonment for a period <strong>of</strong> threeyears.Rigorous imprisonment for a period <strong>of</strong> fouryears alongwith fine <strong>of</strong> Rs.100/-.Rigorous imprisonment for a period <strong>of</strong> threeyears alongwith fine <strong>of</strong> Rs.100/-.It is specific to mention here that in the said case, 55 persons have beenconvicted and out <strong>of</strong> these, 50 persons belong to <strong>School</strong> <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Department</strong>and further presently, Shri Ram Kumar is in service and all others have retiredfrom government service at the time <strong>of</strong> their conviction.In view <strong>of</strong> above, firstly it is to be categorized whether the abovementioned <strong>of</strong>fences fall in the category <strong>of</strong> moral turpitude, so as to attractsecond proviso (a) to article 311(2) <strong>of</strong> the Constitution <strong>of</strong> India for takingfurther decision <strong>of</strong> dismissal or removal or reduction in rank on the ground <strong>of</strong>conduct which led to his conviction on a criminal charge. In this regards, nospecific classification has been made neither in the Punjab Civil Services Rule,Volume I, Part - I, nor in the <strong>Haryana</strong> Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal)Rules, 1987. However, instructions issued by Chief Secretary to Government

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!