13.07.2015 Views

Informational Theories of Consciousness: A Review ... - David Gamez

Informational Theories of Consciousness: A Review ... - David Gamez

Informational Theories of Consciousness: A Review ... - David Gamez

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8example, the digital camera sensor mentioned earlier exhibited low Φ becausethere was no causal linking between the elements, and the overall liveliness <strong>of</strong> thissystem would be zero as well. However, whilst Φ and liveliness both measurecausal interactions, they do not measure exactly the same thing: Φ indicates whatinformation a system provides when it enters a particular state, whereas livelinessidentifies the state structures that arise as a result <strong>of</strong> the causal interactions availableto the neurons.5. ExamplesThe experiments in this section were carried out on a 4-neuron network (A,B,C,D)that was constructed with different functions and connectivity. The SpikeStreamanalysis s<strong>of</strong>tware was used to identify the networks‟ complexes and measure theirΦ, and these results were compared to the liveliness <strong>of</strong> each system.5.1 Example 1The connections in the first network are shown in Fig. 4A, which had an ANDfunction in neuron C. The liveliness <strong>of</strong> this network‟s connections are shown inFig. 4B.Fig. 4. (A) Connections and functions <strong>of</strong> Network 1; (B) Liveliness <strong>of</strong> connections in Network 1The Φ analysis <strong>of</strong> Network 1 was carried out for each <strong>of</strong> the 16 possible states <strong>of</strong>the network. The highest Φ complex <strong>of</strong> each set <strong>of</strong> connected neurons was identifiedfor each state <strong>of</strong> the network, and these were averaged to produce the resultsshown in Table 2.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!