Download FREE now! - Eight martinis is a magazine

More documents

Recommendations

Info

over and over to pollute the session. However, it usually alsoleaves the viewer in limbo as to what the actual target is. Forexample:Frontloading: “The target is the activities of the male customersat the Red Horse brothel” (Believe it or not, thatfrontloading is actually given by one of the trainers), Listen– that’s not frontloading. That’s probably the most primo exampleof session pollution I’ve ever seen. The proper definitionof frontloading is telling a viewer “where to put his/her work” in order to provide the needed information. Forexample, let’s say that a session needs to be done in a hurry, sohaving a single, short session is important. In this case, properlyconstructed and pollution-free frontloading might be auseful tool to allow the viewer to get the needed target informationin 20 minutes instead of in 2 or 3 sessions of an houreach. An example of non-polluting frontloading would besomething like: “The target is the activity portion of the target.Focus your work on the activity.” You have just narrowed thetarget pool down to every possible human or otherwiseactivity in all of space and time, so the pollution factor isnegligible. But, you have also been very specific about whatinformation is needed from the session. The viewer stillhas no idea what the target is, but knows to focus on theactivity to the exclusion of other things that would take hours todescribe, or that would attract his/her attention away from theactivity. When the “frontloading” includes target information,it is not frontloading. It is pollution. That doesn’t mean thatfrontloading, when properly done, can’t be a valuable tool forthe remote viewing process..... but it has to be properly done.Problem 9: Different types of _RV require differenttypes of targets:Example: ARV: Most people make the mistake of using normalpicture targets for ARV. For example, (this is from an actualtraining page, too), one target for an ARV session will be, say,a cargo ship, and the other will be the nuclear rods in the coolingpool of a nuclear reactor’s chamber. Though seeminglydifferent, the viewer will generally report a very large, metallic,manmade thing in water. The fact is that in ARV (this goestowards answering the starting question), the target shouldNOT be the actual site. It should be the feedback picture, andagain, the importance of good and trained target selection becomesof the utmost importance. If you are using picturesfor feedback, then the picture, itself, should be the viewer’starget. Why? Because the person judging the session has totake each descriptor and judge it by what’s in the picture - notby what he imagines will be at a site surrounding what’s in thepicture.Normal remote viewing, though, and especially the ControlledRemote Viewing that was developed for espionage purposes,MUST view the actual site, and not the feedback. For example,when you work for the police, you will be promised feedback.But what usually happens is that their idea of feedbackis going to be something like, “Yeah! It was good. Thanks.”They have a hundred other cases waiting to be taken care of,and you just aren’t going to get accurate feedback. Anotherexample is when you work for corporations or even governmentintelligence agencies. The information you give themmay impinge on classified corporate or government information,which means that when they give you feedback, it willtend to be a lie. So, if what you view is your feedback, you aregoing to be pretty useless in cases where feedback will be a lie,or not be given, at all.NOTE: In Research mode, every type of remote viewingrequires you to view your feedback. That is the only way aresearcher can accurately determine whether you viewedsuccessfully or not. For research, if what you find is not in thefeedback picture, and the researcher counts it as correct outof his own logical assumptions about the site, his work andfindings will get torn apart in peer review.Bottom line: In ARV, and all research work, you should viewyour feedback. In normal training, practice and operationalRV, you should view the actual site. Hence, the question sentto the email list becomes even more critical: In regular training,practice, and operational viewing, should ANY viewing ofan actual site ever be judged by how it matches a feedbackpicture?SO!! Those are just a few of the problems facing the pioneeringviewers of today (that’s you, btw). As most of you know,my company is named, “P>S>I”, which stands for “Problems(lead to) Solutions (lead to) Innovations”. So, what can we doabout the problems listed above? Well, just like the problems,there is a plethora of opinions as to what the solutions mightbe:Solution 1: Regulate the field to the point where thereis no leeway for error.Of course, then the science of remote viewing will face thesame problems as other sciences – each and every potentialdevelopment will be bitterly argued against by already biasedpeers, who have probably already written their own booksand theories and are heavily invested in the status quo remainingunchanged. Highly regulated rules and restrictionsbecome boxes and those who think outside the boxes are justtroublemakers.Solution 2: Have no rules and “just let it happen”however anyone wants to do it.This, of course, eliminates all chances of making this field intoa viable science, and brings it down to the level of respect andusefulness historically given to “all them-thar psychic kooks”.A hundred good and useful pieces of work one valid persondoes will be judged and ridiculed by people who only careabout the one flagrant craziness of some guy who years ago20 *eight martinis
predicted the end of the world from massive alien attacks, andgot it wrong.Solution 3: Have a body of experts decide what is acceptableand what isn’t.The inherent problem here is that “experts NEVER agree”.Solution 4: Have the needs of the world set thestandards:This is already happening, in the absence of other guidance.Some people are specializing in ARV work. Others are specializingin police work. Others are specializing in remote viewingfor corporate R&D. Each of these end-user applications requiredifferent working protocols, reporting protocols, judgingprotocols, etc. The specific needs of the real-world customerswill dictate viewing, judging, reporting, databasing and otherrequirements to those doing the remote viewing work. If –and only if – good record keeping is maintained and sharedamong those doing these different types of operational work,the various applications will, given time and experience, settleinto good, useful and valid protocols – but they will be specificto each type of work being done.This, in the end, may be the ultimate practical solution to theproblems we pioneers in the field are facing. But, it takestime. It also requires the simple act of asking questions, likethe one at the start of this article, and then wading throughall the opinions, arguments, and insights which are containedin the responses. It then becomes the responsibility of the individualviewer to decide what response to believe by findingout which one works ----- and that’s true of all the responsesyou get to your questions – even this article. Solving the problemswill require a lot of questioning, creative thinking, opennessto giving up cherished solutions to new ideas, and lots ofwork, time, record keeping and experience. We’re in the stageright now of having Problems and looking for Solutions. I’mreally looking forward to seeing what Innovations will come aswe work together to develop this field. Good luck.*Lyn BuchananFostering Growth: The Power of OneLyn Buchanan was one of the Controlled Remote Viewers forthe U.S. military, was their database manager, property bookmanager, and one of the trainers of the unit. He now runsProblems>Solutions>Innovations a Controlled Remote Viewingtraining, service, and databased research company.Web: http://www.crviewer.comE: lynbuchanan@beyondbb.comOur world is shaped by each of us, singularly as individuals and collectively as groups. Controlled Remote Viewing (CRV) is a structured,scientific methodology utilizing advanced psychology to develop the communication of the conscious and subconscious minds. Initially CRVwas used by the military intelligence community as an intelligence gathering tool to assist with collecting sensory perceptions across timeand space. Several former members of the intelligence community brought CRV to the civilian sector and have been teaching the viewingprotocol since it was declassified in 1995.The Controlled Remote Viewer follows a reproducible, scientific protocol to establish site contact at a real-world location, then proceedsto write detailed sensory perceptions about that location as if they are actually there. During training those perceptions are compared to aFostering feedback Aesthetic photo Impact Growth: previously Informational The hidden Power in Services, a sealed of One envelope. LLC, offers The formalized viewer moves CRV through theory and several methodology training stages, instruction building as well and as reinforcing Analysis the and trustOurand Project accuracy Managementworld is shapedof the information Consultingby each ofcommunicated Services. Freeus, singularly asbetween onlineindividualstheir remoteandconscious viewingcollectivelyand targetassubconscious discussions,groups. Controlledminds. open to both the entire remote viewingRemote Viewing (CRV) is a structured,community as well as the general public are scheduled every two weeks. For those unable to attend, a roster of past discussionscientific methodology utilizing advanced psychology to develop the communication of the conscious and subconscious minds. Initially CRVwasThe recordings advanced isused by thepsychology available atmilitary intelligenceand www.aestheticimpact.com.potentialcommunityuse of CRVas anisintelligencestill in its infancy.gatheringAesthetictool toImpactassistInformationalwith collectingServices,sensoryLLCperceptionsoffers freeacrosswebinarstimeandaboutspace.this evolvingSeveralmentalformermartialmembersartofbytheseveralintelligenceindividuals.communitySpeakersbroughtincludeCRVLyntoBuchananthe civilianandsectorDr. Pauland haveH. Smith,beenformerteachingmembersthe viewingandprotocoltrainers Patricia ofsincethe Benner, Stargate PhD,it was declassifiedmilitary RN, recognized intelligence subconsciousin 1995.unit, Dr. Angela intuitive Thompson-Smith, development Dr. in her Courtney book Novice Brown, Dr. Expert. Dominique Her research Surel, Marty is considered Rosenblatt,one of the gold standards of the nursing profession. My professional communication skills as a nurse, coupled with training as aLori Williams, Melvin Morse, M.D., Paul O’Connor and Teresa Frisch. To register for webinars and learn more about pioneering this humanControlled Remote Viewer and Analyst enable me to create an atmosphere of individualized learning. Translating the concepts of CRVTheability,Controlledgo to www.aestheticimpact.com.Remote Viewer follows a reproducible,The InternationalscientificRemoteprotocolViewertoAssociationestablish siteofferscontactadditionalat a real-worldinformationlocation,and IRVAthenConferencetheory, methodology and terminology into “what it looks like” scenarios is what I do.proceedstoDVDswritearedetailedavailablesensoryfor purchaseperceptionsat www.irva.org.about that location as if they are actually there. During training those perceptions are compared to afeedback photo previously hidden in a sealed envelope. The viewer moves through several training stages, building and reinforcing the trustand accuracy of the information communicated between their conscious and subconscious minds.www.aestheticimpact.comThe advanced psychology and potential use of CRV is still in its infancy. Aesthetic Impact Informational Services, LLC offers free webinarsabout this evolving mental martial art by several individuals. Speakers include Lyn Buchanan and Dr. Paul H. Smith, former members *eight martinis and 21trainers of the Stargate military intelligence unit, Dr. Angela Thompson-Smith, Dr. Courtney Brown, Dr. Dominique Surel, Marty Rosenblatt,Lori Williams, Melvin Morse, M.D., Paul O’Connor and Teresa Frisch. To register for webinars and learn more about pioneering this human
Page 3 and 4: CONTENTISSUE 9APRIL 2013Introductio
Page 5: Ingo Swann - artist, author and fat
Page 8 and 9: esults in much higher memory of the
Page 10 and 11: cognitive, and personality assessme
Page 12 and 13: extendingout in all directions. And
Page 14 and 15: Ingo is now on his next voyage of d
Page 16 and 17: leaning back against the sign, puff
Page 18: Judging, Scoring and Feedback,There
Page 23 and 24: emy as a Parapsychological Expert i
Page 25 and 26: About Laith MuhammadI work at the N
Page 27 and 28: eceiving a spanking is at least som
Page 29 and 30: AMELIARemote Viewing Search for Ame
Page 31: Feedback: Regarding McKean Atoll, J
Page 35 and 36: ATS: Amelia and Fred were eventuall
Page 37 and 38: OTHER STRUCTURESMultiple viewers me
Page 41 and 42: Psychics often thought of themselve
Page 43 and 44: Corporate Remote ViewingBy Willy De
Page 45 and 46: GREG KOLODZIEJZYK’S 13-YEAR ASSOC
Page 47 and 48: The new approach presented in my re
Page 49 and 50: displayed below it.My objective dur
Page 51: ResultsTrialsFrom May 11, 1998, to
Page 54 and 55: HOW THE BRAIN WORKS IN A RV-SESSION
Page 56 and 57: Let us analyse the A-aspect.First t
Page 58: Remote viewing ResourcesTen Thousan

Download FREE now! - Eight martinis is a magazine

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?