Jabberwocky priming

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Mazoyer, B. M., Tzourio, N., Frak, V., Syrota, A., Murayama, N., Levrier, O., Salamon,G., Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., & Mehler, J. (1993). The Cortical Representation ofSpeech. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5(4), 467-479.McRae, K., & Boisvert, S. (1998). Automatic semantic similarity <strong>priming</strong>. Journal ofExperimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 24(3), 558-572.Moro, A., Tettamanti, M., Perani, D., Donati, C., Cappa, S. F., & Fazio, F. (2001). Syntaxand the brain: Disentangling grammar by selective anomalies. Neuroimage, 13(1),110-118.Müller, S. (2006). Phrasal or Lexical Constructions ? Language, 82(4), 1-38.Rappaport Hovav, M., & Levin, B. (1998). Building Verb Meanings. In M. Butt & W.Geuder (Eds.), The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors(pp. 97-134). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Roeder, B., Stock, O., Neville, H., Bien, S., & Roesler, F. (2002). Brain ActivationModulated by the Comprehension of Normal and Pseudo-word sentences ofdifferent processing demands: A functinoal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.NeuroImage, 15, 1003-1014.Stefanowitsch A., & Gries S. (2003). Collostructions: Investigating the interaction ofwords and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(35), 209-243 Thompson-Schill, S. L., Kurtz, K. J., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1998). Effects of semantic andassociative relatedness on automatic <strong>priming</strong>. Journal of Memory and Language,38(4), 440-458.
Yamada, Y., and Neville, H.J. 2007. An ERP study of syntactic processing in English andnonsense sentences. Brain Research 1130: 167-180.
Page 1 and 2: Evidence for Automatic Accessing of
Page 3 and 4: will likely begin a discussion of s
Page 5 and 6: Bencini & Goldberg (2000) conducted
Page 7 and 8: despite the fact that helping with
Page 9 and 10: high frequency associates and lower
Page 11 and 12: ProcedureParticipants performed lex
Page 13 and 14: Figure 1: Basic structure for a pri
Page 15 and 16: Again, the same target words were u
Page 17 and 18: Figure 2: Reaction times for congru
Page 19 and 20: priming is well-known to be weaker
Page 21 and 22: from the lexicon. The present findi
Page 23: Goldberg, A. E. (2010). Verbs, Fram

Jabberwocky priming

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?