TABLE OF CONTENTSEARLY CHILD LABOR LEGISLATION 11938 TO 1986 11986 FORWARD 2THE ROLE OF PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION 3CONCLUSION 4NOTES 5
EARLY CHILD LABOR LEGISLATIONAcknowledgment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> child labor as a dist<strong>in</strong>ct c<strong>on</strong>stituent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> workforce has been <strong>on</strong> <strong>India</strong>’s statute book s<strong>in</strong>ce atleast 1881. The Factories Act <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1881 set <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> m<strong>in</strong>imum age <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> employment at seven years, with a maximum <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> n<strong>in</strong>ehours <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> work per day. The act also outlawed <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> “double employment” <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> child workers <strong>in</strong> two factories <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>same day. In 1891 <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Factories Act was amended, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> m<strong>in</strong>imum age for employment <strong>in</strong> a factory t<strong>on</strong><strong>in</strong>e years. In 1911, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> act was aga<strong>in</strong> amended to prohibit <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> employment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> children <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> dangerousprocesses. The device <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a “certificate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> fitness” was <strong>in</strong>troduced. This has sur-vived to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> present, where acertify<strong>in</strong>g surge<strong>on</strong> is entrusted with assess<strong>in</strong>g whe<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r a “young pers<strong>on</strong> has completed his 14th year, that he hasatta<strong>in</strong>ed <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> prescribed physical standards and he is fit for such work.” 1In 1922, it was ILO C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> 5 that prompt-ed rais<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> m<strong>in</strong>imum age <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Factories Act to fifteen years andrestrict<strong>in</strong>g work<strong>in</strong>g hours for child workers to six hours with a half-hour break after four and a half hours. In 1901,<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> M<strong>in</strong>es Act prohibited <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> employment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a child under twelve years <strong>in</strong> any m<strong>in</strong>e where <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s weredan-gerous to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir health and safety. Employment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> children was restricted to open-cast m<strong>in</strong>es with a depth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>less than twenty feet.Report<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 1929, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Royal Commissi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> Labour, under <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> chairmanship <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> John Henry Whitley, had asignificant impact <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> recogni-ti<strong>on</strong> and legislative treatment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> child labor. It reported widespread prevalence<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> child labor <strong>in</strong> a range <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong>dustries <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g carpet, bidi, textile, match, and plantati<strong>on</strong>s. A series <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> lawsfollowed. The <strong>India</strong>n Ports Act <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1931 set twelve years as <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> m<strong>in</strong>imum age for handl<strong>in</strong>g goods <strong>in</strong> ports. The TeaDistricts Emigrant Labour Act <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1932 provided that no child below sixteen years be employed, or allowed tomigrate, unless accompanied by parents. The Factories Act <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1934 prohibited chil-dren below twelve years frombe<strong>in</strong>g employed <strong>in</strong> factories and restricted work to five hours a day for children between twelve and fifteen. TheM<strong>in</strong>es Act, <strong>in</strong> 1935, raised <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> m<strong>in</strong>imum age to fifteen years and required a certificate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> fitness for chil-drenbetween fifteen and seventeen years.The <strong>Child</strong>ren (Pledg<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Labour) Act, passed <strong>in</strong>to law <strong>in</strong> 1933, is <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> first acknowledgment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> problem <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>child b<strong>on</strong>dage. Enacted because “it is expedient to prohibit <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> mak<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> agree-ments to pledge <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> labour <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>children, and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> employment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> children whose labour has been pledged,” 2 <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> act def<strong>in</strong>es a child as a pers<strong>on</strong>under <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> age <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> fifteen. While declar<strong>in</strong>g that an agree-ment to pledge <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> labor <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a child shall be void, it prescribespunishment for parents or guardians who make an agreement to pledge <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> labor <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a child and for any pers<strong>on</strong> whomakes such an agree-ment with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> parent or guardian. Punishment may also attach to <strong>on</strong>e who know<strong>in</strong>gly employsa child bound by such an agreement. This act <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1933 survives, virtually unchanged, leav<strong>in</strong>g even <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> m<strong>in</strong>usculepenalties <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Rs. 50 to Rs. 200 for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> various breaches unamended.1938 TO 1986In 1938, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Employment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Child</strong>ren Act was <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> first enactment squarely address<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> issue <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> child labor. Thisfollowed from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> twenty-third sessi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Internati<strong>on</strong>al <strong>Labor</strong> C<strong>on</strong>ference, held <strong>in</strong> 1937, which adopted aspecial article ex-clusively <strong>on</strong> <strong>India</strong>, recommend<strong>in</strong>g that children below thirteen years be prohibited from work <strong>in</strong>certa<strong>in</strong> categories <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> employment. The 1938 act set <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> m<strong>in</strong>imum age <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> employment <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustries at fifteenand <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> transport <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> goods <strong>on</strong> docks and wharves at fourteen.In 1950, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> C<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>India</strong> was pro-mulgated. Article 24 reads, “No child below <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> age <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 14 years shallbe employed to work <strong>in</strong> any factory or m<strong>in</strong>e or engaged <strong>in</strong> any o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r hazardous employment.” This is c<strong>on</strong>sidereda Fundamental Right, guaranteed <strong>in</strong> part 3 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>. Part 4 sets out n<strong>on</strong>justiciable Directive Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>State Policy. These <strong>in</strong>clude directives that “<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> tender age <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> child are not abused and that citizens are not forcedby ec<strong>on</strong>omic necessity to enter avo-cati<strong>on</strong>s unsuited to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir age and strength”; “that children are given opportunitiesand facilities to develop <strong>in</strong> a healthy manner and <strong>in</strong> c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> freedom and dignity and that childhood andyouth are protected aga<strong>in</strong>st exploitati<strong>on</strong> and aga<strong>in</strong>st moral and material aband<strong>on</strong>ment”; and that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> state shallendeavor to provide “free and compul-sory educati<strong>on</strong> for all children until <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y complete <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> age <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 14 years”with<strong>in</strong> ten years. In 1993, many years after <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> ten-year period had elapsed, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> supreme court, <strong>in</strong> a landmarkdecisi<strong>on</strong>, declared free educati<strong>on</strong> to age fourteen to be a Fundamental Right. 3 In 2002, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong> wasamended to reflect <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> supreme court’s judicial declarati<strong>on</strong>. Article 21-A reads, “Right to Educati<strong>on</strong>. The state1