QARAQALPAQS14as Xorasanı mu'yiz or qoltıqsha mu'yiz ('armpit horns', so-called because they were often used todecorate the underarms of a garment) were aligned along straight guide lines which were arrangedas either zigzags or a diagonal lattice.The rarest surviving item of Qaraqalpaq costume is the ko'k ko'ylek wedding dress (the termmeans blue dress), only seven examples of which survive in the museums of No'kis and SaintPetersburg. One of its unusual features was that its front was richly embroidered in cross-stitch ina pattern that was called sawıt nag'ıs or armour (i.e. chain-mail) pattern, its amuletic powerprotecting the young bride from the envious evil eye. As a consequence the ko'k ko'ylek wasrevered for its mystical supernatural powers. Porxans sometimes 'treated' sick people byenveloping them in the smoke from a smouldering piece of ko'k ko'ylek. People also believed theywould benefit from the longevity of an elderly female relative. On her death fragments would becut from her ko'k ko'ylek to be shared among members of her surviving family. This may be thereason why the sleeves have been removed from some surviving ko'k ko'yleks.Most ko'k ko'yleks have two or three bold Xorasanı mu'yiz motifs embroidered down thefront, while the two most common motifs that make up the sawıt nag'ıs design are segiz mu'yiz(eight horns) and at ayıl nag'ıs (horse’s bellyband pattern, so called because it was always used todecorate a horse's bellyband). The latter consists of a diamond enclosing a stepped diamond and across, a motif that seems to be similarly associated with protection and fertility.In the late nineteenth century a radically new style of kiymeshek emerged, inspired by thearrival of new imported textiles – red and black fulled woollen ushıga from the factories ofMoscow and ikat-patterned silk and cotton adras from the workshops of Khiva. The fulled woolcloth had a featureless surface, which encouraged women to abandon their traditional cross-stitchand to develop a completely new style of chain-stitch embroidery, probably inspired by theneighbouring Chodor Turkmen.The new red or qızıl kiymeshek still fulfilled the same protective role as its aq kiymeshekpredecessor but was a much more stunningly colourful garment. Its armoury not only included thecolour red but also a wide range of new chain-stitch mu'yiz motifs. Even the design of the silkadras which formed the rear tail of the kiymeshek incorporated red and green ram's horns. Manyqızıl kiymesheks were decorated on the front with a horizontal panel containing either segiz mu'yizor an interlocking lattice of small mu'yiz motifs. Others used new diamond-shaped motifsincorporating flowers or even scorpion's tails. In all cases the edges and pattern borders wereedged with continuous rows of smaller horn motifs, such as qos mu'yiz (pairs of horns) or taqmu'yiz (odd horns).Horns also frequently formed part of the most prestigious item of bridal jewellery, theha'ykel, which was worn conspicuously on the breast. The two most common forms of ha’ykelincorporated curved ram's horns, either twisting upwards or downwards. Its purpose was primarilytalismanic, to protect the bride during her wedding and her later child-bearing years and to ensurethat she was reproductively fertile. It even incorporated a hollow tumar container to hold amuleticitems such as strips of textile, knotted threads, needles, salt, or a piece of paper inscribed with aprayer by the mullah. Once her child-bearing days were over a woman replaced her ha'ykel with asimple hornless tumar.We must re-emphasize that many of these motifs are not unique to the Qaraqalpaqs. Theyare also found in the textiles and weavings of the Kazakhs, Uzbeks, Turkmen, and Kyrgyz. TheSiberian ethnographer Sergey Ivanov went further, reporting in 1957 that they also occurredamong the Tatars of the Volga (the Bashkirs, Chuvash, and Udmurts), the Slavs of Ukraine, theUgric and Finnish people of the Ob River in Siberia (the Mordvin, Mari, and Khanty), and theTatars of the Altai.In 1958 the Ukrainian ethnographer Tatyana Zhdanko, who specialized in studying theQaraqalpaqs, suggested that some of their simple angular horn motifs were ancient, linking themto patterns on the ceramics of the first millennium Bronze Age steppe nomads, the Andronovo.Indeed Ivanov found archaeological materials linking some of the Siberian horn motifs back to theNeolithic. However within a year Zhdanko had to acknowledge that it was impossible to establish
15 QARAQALPAQScultural continuity. The Andronovo designs disappeared at the end of the Bronze Age. TheScythian and Saka nomads of the Iron Age had a radically different 'animal style' of decoration.Researching the origin of designs can be a foolhardy occupation. Anthropologists warn usthat when analogous traits of culture are found among different peoples they have usually beendeveloped independently. The horn motifs that we find in Qaraqalpaq and other Central <strong>Asian</strong>textiles seem to be much more recent. Angular horns appear in some 13 th century Seljuq carpetsdiscovered in the Sultan Alaeddin mosque at Konya in Anatolia and in Oriental carpets depicted inthe 15 th century paintings of Hans Memling, some of which were probably also woven in Anatolia.It is tempting to suggest that the Seljuqs introduced these patterns from Central Asia, where noweavings of comparable age have survived. It is noticeable that angular horns primarily appear insupplementary weft-patterned tent bands, slit tapestry flat-weaves, knotted pile carpets, patternedreed screens, and cross-stitch embroideries, where it is easier to depict motifs delineated bystraight or diagonal lines. Curved horn motifs are more common in chain-stitch embroideries,appliqués, and items that have been painted or carved, where such constraints do not apply. Thissuggests that technique had an overriding influence on the development of angular horned motifs,the motifs becoming an intrinsic part of the weaving or embroidering process.The widespread occurrence of these bold and varied livestock horn patterns coupled with themystery of their origin and the protective purposes for which they were used only increases ourinterest in these remarkable and powerful textiles.David and Sue Richardson’sbook, Qaraqalpaqs of the AralDelta, now published by PrestelVerlag, Munich, (ISBN: 978-3-7913-4738-7), will be reviewed inthe October edition of <strong>Asian</strong><strong>Textile</strong>s.MEMBERSHIP OF OXFORD <strong>ASIAN</strong> TEXTILE GROUP(includes three issues of <strong>Asian</strong> <strong>Textile</strong>s)Membership subscriptions were due for renewal on 1 st October.The current subscription is £15, or £20 for joint membership.If you pay by cheque and have not yet done so for this year, I look forward to receivingyour subscriptions very soon. If you are not on e-mail and would like to receive a receipt,please include a stamped addressed envelope with your payment.If you have been paying by cheque please consider setting up a bankers order.You can download a form from the websitehttp://www.oatg.org.uk/oatg-bo.pdfAny queries, please contact me.