02.12.2012 Views

“Fritz West, himself a methodological master of ... - Liturgical Press

“Fritz West, himself a methodological master of ... - Liturgical Press

“Fritz West, himself a methodological master of ... - Liturgical Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the Roman Rite in the <strong>West</strong> and the Byzantine Rite in the East. 55 At the<br />

same time that these rites had in themselves become uniform, however,<br />

they had also become distinct from one another. Their differences<br />

stemmed from how language and culture had shaped them (chapter<br />

11), 56 to what degree they embraced change or valued continuity<br />

(chapter 12), how they managed the pastoral question <strong>of</strong> comprehensibility<br />

(chapter 13), and their attitude—prior the ninth century—toward<br />

the liturgical embellishment <strong>of</strong> poetry (chapter 14). 57 Baumstark counts<br />

it significant that the imperial rites became firm in form in the very<br />

same century that they accepted challenges <strong>of</strong> evangelism. For in the<br />

ninth century both embraced evangelical missions toward the north:<br />

the Latin Church among the Scandinavians and the western Slavs,<br />

the Greek Church among the eastern Slavs. 58 In this work the imperial<br />

rites encountered cultures and languages different from their own.<br />

Having already been firmly formed, however, they had the confidence<br />

to project their imperial cultures into alien worlds to the north.<br />

At this point another organic process emerged—malformation, with<br />

two aspects: (1) the clear lines <strong>of</strong> the classical liturgy became blurred,<br />

and (2) the “natural” processes <strong>of</strong> the liturgical organism were compromised.<br />

59 The first aspect came to pass with the rampant growth <strong>of</strong><br />

55 Baumstark, On the Historical Development, pp. 128–29. The Byzantine<br />

Rite is a blend <strong>of</strong> the old Constantinopolitan Rite and the Jerusalem Rite, the<br />

Roman Rite a blend <strong>of</strong> the old Roman and the Frankish rites.<br />

56 For Baumstark, cultural traits can be distinctive enough to serve as criteria<br />

for categorizing liturgical texts. For example, ibid., pp. 69–70.<br />

57 While the period for the “Formation <strong>of</strong> Rites: Contrasts” is generally the<br />

same as that for “Formation <strong>of</strong> Rites: Similarities” (313–842/43), there are<br />

some differences. Notably, “Language and Nation” (chap. 11) impacted the<br />

liturgy from its first days and continues do so on through its history. The characteristics<br />

<strong>of</strong> “Development, Persistence, and Hardening” are set in this period<br />

but not limited to it. Finally, chap. 14, “The Ivy <strong>of</strong> Poetry” pertains both to the<br />

“Formation <strong>of</strong> Rites: Contrasts” and “Malformation.” In dealing with poetry<br />

prior to 842/43 (an approximate date), Baumstark describes how the East and<br />

the <strong>West</strong> contrasted sharply in their attitude toward liturgical poetry. Following<br />

that time, however, liturgical poetry overwhelmed and suffocated venerable<br />

liturgical forms in both East and <strong>West</strong> (see below).<br />

58 Ibid., pp. 128–29.<br />

59 The period <strong>of</strong> “malformation” needs to be qualified as well. The liturgy<br />

began to be overgrown by poetry and prayers approximately in the ninth century,<br />

but the terminus ad quem <strong>of</strong> this process is different in the <strong>West</strong> and<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!