16. THE INTRODUCTIONS UNDER THEFACTORIES ACT <strong>1948</strong>(A) Copy <strong>of</strong> Letter No. 9815-C-6687. L-4 P-55-55/55968 dated 19th September, 1955from the Secretary to <strong>Government</strong>. Punjab <strong>Labour</strong> <strong>Department</strong>, Chandigarh, to theGeneral Officer-in-chief, Western Comm-andm SimlaSubject—Application <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Factories</strong> <strong>Act</strong>, <strong>1948</strong> to Defence InstallationsIn continuations <strong>of</strong> Punjab <strong>Government</strong> en-dorsement No. 4050/3355-C-LP-5p/24710,dated the 18th May, 1955, on the subject noted above I am directed to State that in view<strong>of</strong> the position explained by the <strong>Government</strong> <strong>of</strong> India in their letter No. FAC 41(416),dated the 10th August, 1965 (Copy enclosed) <strong>The</strong> State <strong>Government</strong> regret their enabilityto exempt the Civilian General Transport companies at Pathankot from the application <strong>of</strong>the <strong>Factories</strong> <strong>Act</strong>, <strong>1948</strong>. I am, accordingly to request you to kindly have these factoriesregistered under the said <strong>Act</strong> at a very early date. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Labour</strong> Commissioner, Punjab, isbeingasked to keep in view the instruction contained in letter No. Fac 41 (134), dated the13th November, 1953, from the <strong>Government</strong> <strong>of</strong> India (copy enclosed)(B) Copy <strong>of</strong> D.O. No. CAF/30 (46), dated the 30th September, 1957, from shri N.S.Mankiker) Chief Adviser <strong>of</strong> <strong>Factories</strong>, Ministry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Labour</strong>, New Delhi, to Shri C.A.Ahuja Chief Inspector <strong>of</strong> <strong>Factories</strong>, Alexander Road, Ambala Cantt.Will you please refer to your D.O. letter No. 27649, dated the 26th September, 1957,enquiring whether in case <strong>of</strong> a factory whose proprietors, Management workers andMachinarly remain unchanged but only the Factory is shifted from one placed to another,the licence originally granted would hold good.In the absence <strong>of</strong> specific rules in the matter Rule 9 <strong>of</strong> Punjab Factory Rules, will applyin which discretion for the amendment <strong>of</strong> licence is given wholly to the Chief Inspector<strong>of</strong> <strong>Factories</strong>. In the present case, I think, it would not be inapproprite for your to merelyamend the licence on charging the prescribed fee <strong>of</strong> rupees five.<strong>The</strong> amendment in this case, will be only change in the location <strong>of</strong> the factory.(C) Copy <strong>of</strong> letter No. 3305-5 Lab-58/35182, dated 2nd May, 1958, from Secretary to<strong>Government</strong> Punjab, <strong>Labour</strong> <strong>Department</strong> Chandigarh to the <strong>Labour</strong> Commissioner,Punjab, Ambala Cantt.Subject—Expemtion from the provisions <strong>of</strong> section 58 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Factories</strong> <strong>Act</strong>, <strong>1948</strong>Reference you letter No. GGN/P-66961 dated 4th March, 1958. on subject noted above.2. <strong>Government</strong> desired that in future the views <strong>of</strong> workers and their Unions must beascertained and forwarded to <strong>Government</strong>. This would make matters fully clear and if theworkers desire to object, opportunities should be afforded to them for the said purpose.<strong>The</strong>re fore, you are requested to do the needful in this case immediately.(D) Copy <strong>of</strong> letter No. CAF/40(3) dated the 10th October, 1957 addressed to the Director<strong>of</strong> Industrial Statistics, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Commerce and Industry. I Council House Street,Calcutta-1
Subject—Treatment <strong>of</strong> Students <strong>of</strong> Technical Institutes as ‘‘Workers’’ under the<strong>Factories</strong> <strong>Act</strong>, <strong>1948</strong>.With reference to your letter No. 7-SIG(3) 52, dated the 9th December, 1954, and thecorrespondence resting with yiur reminder, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Law have advised that studentsworking in the Technical Institute registered as ‘‘factories’’ are to be treated as‘‘workers’’ under the <strong>Factories</strong> <strong>Act</strong>, <strong>1948</strong>.(E) A copy <strong>of</strong> letter No. CAE/30(3), dated 13th December, 1956, from the <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> theChief Adviser <strong>Factories</strong>.Subject—Overtime wages under <strong>Factories</strong> <strong>Act</strong>, <strong>1948</strong>.Sir,Please refer to your letter No. 25353, dated the 24th September, 1956, on the abovesubject.<strong>The</strong> <strong>Factories</strong> <strong>Act</strong>, <strong>1948</strong> provides only for weekly holidays and if a worker is deprived <strong>of</strong>any <strong>of</strong> such holidays the provision <strong>of</strong> section 53 requires that he should be allowedcompensatory holidays <strong>of</strong> equal number, the idea being that a worker must have rest for awhole day after a week’s work. Any other holdiays granted to worker for festivals orother similar occasions in any factory depend upon the local usage or custom, and there isno provision in the <strong>Factories</strong> <strong>Act</strong> to regulate the work done on those holidays.<strong>The</strong> provisions <strong>of</strong> section 59 relating to over-time wages will apply where the daily hours<strong>of</strong> a workers exceed 9 or the hours worked in a week exceed 48 irrespective <strong>of</strong> theworker’s having worked on a weekly holiday or festival holiday or any other day.Your faithfullyS.R. BHISE,Chief Adviser, <strong>Factories</strong>(F) GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENTOFFICE OF THE CHIEF ADVISER FACTORIESNO. 1 (5)/57-GAF, IITHE NEW DELHI, THE 5TH APRIL, 1958.FromShri N.S. Mankiker, B.Sc. B.E., A.M.I.E.,Chief Adviser, <strong>Factories</strong>To<strong>The</strong> Chief Inspector <strong>of</strong> <strong>Factories</strong>Punjab Ambala Cantt.Subject—Licencing fee in factories :Sir,With reference to your letter No. ASR/A-27/7080, dated the 8th March, 1958, I am tostate the according to the definition <strong>of</strong> the term ‘factory’ in the <strong>Factories</strong> <strong>Act</strong>, <strong>1948</strong>, anestablishment which is a ‘factories’ on any date will continue to be a factorry for 12monthes from that date though on any-days during those 12 months not more than 9
- Page 1 and 2: 1.THE FACTORIES ACT, 1948THE 29TH J
- Page 3 and 4: 3. THE FACTORIES ACT, 1948 ORDERTHE
- Page 5 and 6: 5. THE FACTORIES ACT, 1948THE 13TH
- Page 7 and 8: 7. THE FACTORIES ACT, 1948NOTIFICAT
- Page 9 and 10: 9. THE FACTORIES ACT, 1948THE 2ND J
- Page 11 and 12: 11. THE FACTORIES ACT, 1948No. S.O.
- Page 13 and 14: 13. THE FACTORIES ACT, 1948THE 1ST
- Page 15: 15. THE FACTORIES ACT, 1948NOTIFICA
- Page 19 and 20: Assistant Surgeon and Compounder :
- Page 21 and 22: (iv) The answer to your querry is i
- Page 23 and 24: Subject—Coverage under Factories
- Page 25 and 26: (h) Jails :—They are coverd by th
- Page 27 and 28: You should now take steps to recove
- Page 29 and 30: 17. THE FACTORIES ACT, 1948NOTIFICA
- Page 31 and 32: 19. THE FACTORIES ACT, 1948NOTIFICA
- Page 33 and 34: 21. THE FACTORIES ACT, 1948NOTIFICA
- Page 35 and 36: Not exceeding 250Exceeding 250 but
- Page 37 and 38: this behalf, by the State Governmen
- Page 39: 24. OFFICE OF THE CHIEF INSPECTOR O