13.07.2015 Views

PFOA stories

PFOA stories

PFOA stories

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the public. Scientists, activists and reporters who are following C8issues monitor that docket.Instead, company officials submitted the information to a generalchemical toxicity filing system where records are not posted on the Webfor months.Asked to explain why the company filed the information the way it did,DuPont spokesman Dan Turner said EPA wanted it handled that way."We take a very conservative approach when submitting to the EPA,"Turner said. "Regardless of whether it is required to be submitted, weerr on the side of caution."We want to get [the information] to the people most interested in it,"Turner said. "EPA can move this if it chooses to another docket."In its filing with EPA, DuPont did not submit a second set of numbersthat it received in July from the science panel.Last week, Rob Bilott, a lawyer for the residents, submitted that set ofnumbers to EPA "to ensure completeness of the submission."That second set of numbers shows how many residents in the C8 healthstudy reported having miscarriages, pre-term births, birth defects andvarious types of cancer. For example, it shows that 11 percent ofreported pregnancies ended in miscarriages.Science panel members have not yet compared those figures with C8 levelsto determine if there is a correlation.Steenland, the science panel member, said that as his group does variousstudies, "You'll get pieces of answers along the way, and as we getthem, we'll announce them."To contact staff writer Ken Ward Jr., use e-mail or call 348-1702.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!