13.07.2015 Views

Volume 170 01-2005 - Telegraph Hill Dwellers

Volume 170 01-2005 - Telegraph Hill Dwellers

Volume 170 01-2005 - Telegraph Hill Dwellers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

P AGE 20 Issue #<strong>170</strong> • Winter <strong>2005</strong>From the Desk of Supervisor PeskinIhope you all had a peacefuland enjoyable holiday season.After the hubbub of a busyelection year, the calm of theDecember holidays provided anopportunity to reflect on events ofrecent months.I, of course, have spent considerabletime during these monthscampaigning for my reelection.Throughout my campaign, I listened to votersacross District 3 stress the importance of having aCity Hall that answers the phone and returns messages.Citizens impressed on me the necessity of agovernment that works harder and leaner in thesetough budget years.I am committed to improving the level ofservice that government provides to SanFranciscans while recognizing that our currentbudgetary constraints require further belt-tightening.It is essential that government, like smallbusinesses, operate under the realities of fiscalconstraints.These fiscal and quality of life issues havecome to the forefront recently on our NortheastWaterfront. The Port of San Francisco has a highlycapable new director, Monique Moyer, who hasproven a commitment to cleaning up mismanagementin that agency and increasing outreachto surrounding communities that are impacted bynew developments on Port property.In response to a slew of new development proposalson the Northeast Waterfront, I recentlyrequested a comprehensive traffic impact study forthe entire area. At present, the city has not analyzedthe cumulative impact on surrounding communitiesand traffic flow along the Embarcaderothat unbridled development will bring.The California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) requires study and reviewof perceived impacts of individualprojects on the surrounding neighborhoods,including any increase intraffic generated by a new development.However, state law doesn’trequire the city to engage in planningrelative to the entire communityon the Northeast Waterfrontand how it will be affected byplanned and proposed developments.I am excited that the San Francisco CountyTransportation Authority has chosen to approvethis important study and we expect data to bereported over the next few months. The fall ofthe Embarcadero Freeway provided SanFrancisco with an unprecedented opportunity torevitalize an entire portion of the City’s storiedurban waterfront.I am proud of the work that has already beenaccomplished to bring new business and architecturalexcellence to this community, and I amcommitted to working with neighborhood representativesand local businesses to ensure a balancedapproach to future development. TheNortheast Waterfront is a crown jewel of SanFrancisco neighborhoods and we will continue towork hard to guarantee appropriate developmentsalong the Embarcadero.As always, our office is available for any questionsor concerns you may have about City operation,neighborhood issues, or new ideas for makingthe City operate more effectively. Don’t hesitate tocontact me or my staff, Rose Chung and DavidOwen, at (415) 554-7451 or Aaron.Peskin@sfgov.org. See you around the waterfront.EDITOR’S NOTE: On January 8, SupervisorPeskin was unanimously chosen by his colleagues toserve as President of the Board of Supervisors.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!