Leeson NARPM SERDP ESTCP Info Session June 2009_hs.pdf

More documents

Recommendations

Info

In Situ RemediationRational Selection of Tailored Amendment Mixtures and Composites Upal Ghosh (University of Maryland, Baltimore County) Completing mid 2009Measurement and Modeling of Ecosystem Risk and Recovery for In SituTreatment Dick Luthy (Stanford University) Completing early 2010Microbial dechlorination Max Haggblom (Rutgers University) Completing early 2010, previous project completed in 2006Field DemonstrationsField demonstration of activated carbon mixing• Dick Luthy (Stanford University)• Demonstration complete at Hunter’s Point, report in posting processIn Situ Wetland Restoration• Amy Hawkins (NAVFAC) & Kevin Gardner (University of New Hampshire• In site selection process, installation scheduled for summer 200919th Annual NARPM Training Conference • June 2-5, 2009 • Atlanta, Georgia 76
Monitored Natural Recovery MNR is an importantremedial option that isoften used at contaminatedsediment sites, but ischallenged by the lack ofconsistent guidance anddemonstration projects19th Annual NARPM Training Conference • June 2-5, 2009 • Atlanta, Georgia 77
Page 2 and 3:
Agenda10:15 AM10:20 AM10:30 AM11:15
Page 6 and 7:
Environmental Drivers:Sustainabilit
Page 9 and 10:
SERDP and ESTCP PillarsSustainableI
Page 11 and 12:
SERDP Funding807570$ M656055504540F
Page 13 and 14:
ESTCP Funding$ M5045403530252015105
Page 15 and 16:
Agenda10:15 AM10:20 AM10:30 AM11:15
Page 17 and 18:
Review Committee Responsibilities A
Page 19 and 20:
Recent Workshops All workshops comp
Page 21 and 22:
BAA Call CallReviewCommitteeDevelop
Page 24 and 25:
ESTCP Topic IdentificationTopic are
Page 26 and 27: FY09 ESTCP New Start Project Valida
Page 28 and 29: Environmental Restoration Research
Page 30 and 31: 19th Annual NARPM Training Conferen
Page 32 and 33: 19th Annual NARPM Training Conferen
Page 34 and 35: SELECTED TOPICSOverview(McCarty)Abi
Page 36 and 37: Chlorinated Solvents WorkshopDNAPL
Page 38 and 39: R&D Needs: 2006 WorkshopBetter Unde
Page 40 and 41: Progress1. Assess Source Zone Treat
Page 42 and 43: Progress3. Improve Delivery Nanosca
Page 44 and 45: Key Concepts Mass Flux Can Improve
Page 46 and 47: You Gotta Know Your Limits“Trust
Page 48 and 49: FAQs - a one hour read AudiencePart
Page 50 and 51: DNAPL-Test: A Screening Tool for Se
Page 52 and 53: Amendment Injection Toolkitwww.estc
Page 54 and 55: Mass Flux Toolkit Developed by GSIE
Page 56 and 57: Vapor Intrusion2001Chlorinated Solv
Page 58 and 59: Integrated Field-Scale, Lab-Scale,
Page 62 and 63: Perchlorate RDT&EFY00 FY01 FY02 FY0
Page 64 and 65: Munitions Constituents Research &De
Page 66 and 67: Current Research in Demonstration P
Page 68 and 69: Current Research in Demonstration P
Page 70 and 71: Validation of Sampling Protocol and
Page 74 and 75: Site Characterization and Monitorin
Page 78 and 79: Fate and Transport Projects evaluat
Page 80 and 81: Bioavailability SERDP and ESTCP sup
Page 82 and 83: Sponsored bySERDP and ESTCPPartners
Page 84 and 85: Achieving National Paradigm ShiftsH
Page 86 and 87: ITRC ValuesIntegrityConsensusTechni
Page 88 and 89: Power of the NetworkECOSFederal Gov
Page 90 and 91: 2008 Distribution of State Members8
Page 92 and 93: 2009 Industry Affiliates Program (I
Page 94 and 95: How we do itWe use a proven,cost-ef
Page 96 and 97: ITRC Teams With Active Projects•
Page 98 and 99: 2010 Proposed New Teams Proposals u
Page 100 and 101: Vapor Intrusion CourseSOLD OUT firs
Page 102 and 103: State Points of ContactStates becom
Page 104 and 105: How can you get value from ITRC Dow
Page 106: ConclusionSince 1995, we’ve been
show all

Leeson NARPM SERDP ESTCP Info Session June 2009_hs.pdf

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?