13.07.2015 Views

Meadows v MJELR IESC 3.pdf - European Database of Asylum Law

Meadows v MJELR IESC 3.pdf - European Database of Asylum Law

Meadows v MJELR IESC 3.pdf - European Database of Asylum Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(b) That her entitlement to remain temporarily in the State had expired.(c) That the Minister proposed to make a deportation order in respect<strong>of</strong> the appellant pursuant to s. 3 <strong>of</strong> the Immigration Act 1999.(d) That the appellant was entitled to make written representations tothe Minister, in accordance with s. 3 <strong>of</strong> the Act <strong>of</strong> 1999, setting outany reasons as to why she should be allowed to remain temporarilyin the State.By letter dated 8 th October 2001 the appellant’s solicitor submitted to the Minister inaccordance with s. 3 <strong>of</strong> the Act an application for leave to remain in the State. Theletter referred to her application as “an application for leave to remain in the State onhumanitarian grounds. The reasons advanced in that letter in support <strong>of</strong> thatapplication included the following statement:“May we ask you to know that the applicant has argued as part <strong>of</strong> her refugeeclaim that she will be subjected to female genital mutilation shortly after thearranged marriage and further that is part <strong>of</strong> her decision by the RefugeeAppeals Tribunal at appeal stage, the <strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong> the Tribunal, Ms Monica<strong>Law</strong>lor stated after receiving evidence on the practice <strong>of</strong> FGM in Nigeria that,“I accept without question the evidence <strong>of</strong> Ms D’Arcy that female genitalmutilation is an abhorrent practice and amounts to a form <strong>of</strong> torture”. Theletter argued, inter alia, that the force <strong>of</strong> the return <strong>of</strong> the appellant to Nigeriawould amount to a violation <strong>of</strong> her fundamental right to “life, liberty andsecurity <strong>of</strong> the person” under both national and international law.This was a submission that her case was governed by s. 5 <strong>of</strong> the Refugee Act 1996prohibiting refoulement where there is a threat to the freedom <strong>of</strong> a proposed deportee,within the meaning <strong>of</strong> that section. It is to be distinguished from the ad misercordiammatters submitted for the purpose <strong>of</strong> s. 3(6) <strong>of</strong> the Act <strong>of</strong> 1999.FGMFemale genital mutilation, also referred to as female circumcision, is a practice whichhas been condemned by international bodies and national governments and many- 6 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!