13.07.2015 Views

Urgent Needs: Derogatory Procurement Law Scenarios - ippa.org ...

Urgent Needs: Derogatory Procurement Law Scenarios - ippa.org ...

Urgent Needs: Derogatory Procurement Law Scenarios - ippa.org ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

URGENT NEEDS – DEROGATORY PROCUREMENT LAW SCENARIOS 1876. The July 2007 UNCITRAL Working Group proposedcomprehensive revision of the Model <strong>Law</strong> maintains the 1994version of Article 22.7. Administrator of General Services, the Secretary of Defence, theAdministrator for the National Aeronautics and SpaceAdministration under policy guidelines of the Administrator, Officeof Federal <strong>Procurement</strong> Policy, Office of Management and Budget.Bid protests/claims under the FAR regime are administered by theFederal Accountability Office (GAO) in Washington DC -www.gao.gov.8. To illustrate: A US Federal Government Accountability Office(GAO) bid protest 14 November 2005 was sustained under thearguments that the contracting authority (Air Force had not justifiedunusual and compelling urgency, the urgency in question was aresult of lack of advance planning.9. The quotation is accurate.10. See further, S Arrowsmith The <strong>Law</strong> of Public and Utilities<strong>Procurement</strong> (2005) 9.10 – 9.12 (pp 617-620) on public sector and16.34 (p 975) on utilities’ sector and P Trepte Regulating<strong>Procurement</strong> (2004) pp 286.11. J M F Martín (1994) 3 PPLR CS13, referring also to earlier Italiancase Case-199/85 (10 March 1987) and the La Spezia C-194/88 oninterim Court orders for the suspension of the award of the contractin question.12. In the Munich case, the extraordinary element was the fact that theservice provider was itself subject to EC procurement law. Normally,the submittal of main contract tender bids in the public sector willcarry with it a variety of relationships to potential subcontractors,ranging from mere price quotation to binding (sub)contract subject to“approval” in the actual award of the tender bid. Turning away froma subcontractor which has no binding commitment from the maincontractor (such as when main contractor seeks even moreadvantageous offers in the market) raises the question of whether ornot there is a legally binding promise to act on the pre-contractualcommunication in preparation of the tender bid. In publiccontracting, the contracting authority may require a list for approval

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!