13.07.2015 Views

LinuxWorld.com - sys-con.com's archive of magazines - SYS-CON ...

LinuxWorld.com - sys-con.com's archive of magazines - SYS-CON ...

LinuxWorld.com - sys-con.com's archive of magazines - SYS-CON ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MANAGEMENTRebuffing Micros<strong>of</strong>t’s SpinAbout Linux ManagementNew report reveals the truth about Linux managementB Y J O N W A L K E ROver the last few years, we’ve seen and heard some pretty visceral reactions fromthe Linux <strong>com</strong>munity to Micros<strong>of</strong>t-funded reports about Linux. Rightfully so – some <strong>of</strong>the “facts” in Micros<strong>of</strong>t’s “Get the Facts” campaign have been outright false and mosthave been misleading at the very least.Perhaps no studies have drawn moreire from the Linux <strong>com</strong>munity thanthe total cost <strong>of</strong> ownership (“TCO”)studies by Laura DiDio at the Yankee Groupand the <strong>com</strong>munity also had a strong collectiveoutcry against some very one-sidedMicros<strong>of</strong>t “facts” about Linux security.But one particular focal point <strong>of</strong> Micros<strong>of</strong>t’sfear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD)campaign has gone unchecked for far toolong – and that’s Redmond’s assertionthat Linux is inherently more difficult tomanage than Windows <strong>sys</strong>tems. While thestudies themselves haven’t been quite soone-sided and blatantly inaccurate as some<strong>of</strong> the other FUD areas, Micros<strong>of</strong>t-fundedreports like the Meta Group’s study on “File,Web, and Database Server Administration”(for Linux versus Windows) are built onantiquated, one-sided research findings– and it’s long past time that the enterprise<strong>com</strong>munity got a refresher on where Linuxmanagement stands today versus Windows.A B O U T T H E A U T H O RJon Walker serves as CTO <strong>of</strong> Versora, an ISVproviding Micros<strong>of</strong>t to Linux migration s<strong>of</strong>tware.Mr. Walker recently has co-authored 2 whitepaperswith Novell titled Migrating from IS Web Serversto Apache SUSE LINUX Enterprise Server 9.0 andMigrating File and Print Servers from Windows toSUSE LINUX Enterprise Server 9. Prior to Versora,Mr. Walker was CTO/VP <strong>of</strong> Engineering for MiramarSystems. S<strong>of</strong>tware developed under his directionat Miramar has been deployed to over 20 million<strong>com</strong>puters worldwide. Mr. Walker has also servedas senior technologist for Nortel and XingTechnology (now Real Networks).jwalker@versora.<strong>com</strong>“While Linux is in heavy use in the enterprise,there is a misplaced perception thatmanaging Linux environments is somehowmore difficult or labor-intensive than managingWindows environments,” Dave Rosenberg,principal analyst with Open Source DevelopmentLabs, says. “Micros<strong>of</strong>t has fueled thisidea that Linux is a geeks-only hobbyist niche,which is simply not the case. In fact, Linux<strong>sys</strong>tem management tools are in many casesoutpacing Windows management tools. Themarket needs more information about thetools at their disposal and to understand thatthere is nothing more <strong>com</strong>plex or expensiveinvolved with managing Linux environments.”Enter Levanta and OSDL, who jointlyfunded the Enterprise Management Associates(EMA) report released in February,“Get the Facts on Linux Management.” Thestudy, available in its entirety at Levanta’sWeb site at www.levanta.<strong>com</strong>/linuxstudy/,is the first significant non-vendor-biasedlook at Linux management in a long time.The report focuses on the wide variety <strong>of</strong> cost,<strong>con</strong>cerns, personnel, and other <strong>con</strong>siderationsrelated to managing Linux versus Windowsenvironments. The sample size is quite substantive– the report is based on a telephone surveyusing a random sample <strong>of</strong> several thousand ITorganizations, a Web survey <strong>of</strong> self-selectingrespondents, and in-depth interviews with CIOsand MIS managers in 13 enterprises with Linuxenvironments. Here’s the take-away – Linuxhas matured, and management solutions helpto make it simple and e<strong>con</strong>omical. Below, I’vepulled some notable findings from the report(see sidebar) that, at the very least, provide statsthat call into question the validity <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> theanti-Linux claims.Linux MaturityMany products that solve Linux servermanagement problems didn’t exist twoyears ago. Now that mature Linux managementsolutions are on the scene, big enterprisesand SMEs can significantly reducetheir Linux management and operationscosts (100% <strong>of</strong> the study’s respondentsreport Linux management is the same oreasier than Windows management).Linux has garnered strong supportfrom mainstream hardware vendors andlarge management s<strong>of</strong>tware vendors alike.Micros<strong>of</strong>t supports Linux as a guest operating<strong>sys</strong>tem with it latest release <strong>of</strong> VirtualServer 2005 and promotes technologiesthat integrate Linux management intoMicros<strong>of</strong>t SMS and MOM. After all, if youcan’t beat ‘em, might as well make money<strong>of</strong>f ‘em!APRIL 2006 8 www.<strong>LinuxWorld</strong>.<strong>com</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!