13.07.2015 Views

Harmonising Climate Risk Management - International Institute for ...

Harmonising Climate Risk Management - International Institute for ...

Harmonising Climate Risk Management - International Institute for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ENV/WKP(2011)6• Different levels of maturity of the tools: piloting phase, reviewed and updated based onpreliminary experiences, and extensively used.The tools were also selected <strong>for</strong> analysis on the basis that they either provide a representative sampleof some of the more ‘mature’ tools in the field with active users, or that they capture innovative aspects ofthe climate risk management process such as strategic decision-making. Most have been developed, pilotedin multiple countries in multiple contexts, and rolled out through training programmes and developmentco-operation projects. Some are being reviewed and updated based on preliminary experiences (CEDRA,CRiSTAL). Two of the tools – DFID’s Strategic Programme Review (SPR) and Christian Aid’sAdaptation Toolkit – are newer to the field and are still in a pilot or rollout phase. The SPR was included inthe analysis as it built on DFID’s earlier experiences of piloting its screening and assessment tool ORCHID(Opportunities and <strong>Risk</strong> from <strong>Climate</strong> Change and Disasters), and represents a move to climate riskassessment across whole country offices and their business planning processes. The Christian AidAdaptation Toolkit has received significant attention, particularly among development NGOs, even thoughit was still in draft <strong>for</strong>m when this paper was written.Table 6 compares the tools in terms of their stage in the mainstreaming process, target audience,procedural use, and key inputs and outputs. While most of the donor tools and approaches are increasinglya mandatory part of programme development and management procedure, those in NGOs remainvoluntary. This reflects the move towards linking climate screening and assessment with existingenvironment assessment processes in place in most donor agencies (Agrawala et al., 2010).It should be noted that several of the agencies or organisations covered in this analysis have produceda range of climate screening and/or assessment tools. CARE, <strong>for</strong> example, has a Toolkit <strong>for</strong> IntegratingAdaptation into Projects, in which the application of CVCA is encouraged. GTZ’s <strong>Climate</strong> Proofing <strong>for</strong>Development tool emerged from BMZ’s <strong>Climate</strong> Check tool (now integrated into its EIA process), whichwas targeted specifically at GTZ staff. Thus, the tools reviewed here are not representative of the full rangeof tools that have been developed by their respective agencies.24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!