Quality of dental restorations. FDI Commission Pro... - ResearchGate

152in their own practice. Dent Mater1985 1: 150–153.43. Dermann K. Untersuchungen zurReproduzierbarkeit einiger Werkstoffprüfungenbei Amalgamen.Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1989 44: 764–765.44. McCabe J F, Watts D C, Wilson H J,et al. An investigation of test-housevariability in the mechanical testingof dental materials and the statisticaltreatment of results. J Dent 1990 18:90–97.45. Ferracane J L, Mitchem J C. Propertiesof posterior composite: resultsof round robin testing for a specification.Dent Mater 1994 10: 92–99.46. Sturdevant, C M, Roberson T M,Heymann H O, et al. The Art andScience of Operative Dentistry. 3rd ed.pp 184–205. St. Louis: Mosby, 1995.47. Poorterman J H, Aartman I H,Kalsbeek H. Underestimation of theprevalence of approximal caries andinadequate restorations in a clinicalepidemiological study. CommunityDent Oral Epidemiol 1999 27: 331–337.48. Tobi H, Groen H J, Kreulen C M, etal. Observer variation in the assessmentof resin composite. Dent Mater1998 14: 1–5.49. Oleinisky J C, Baratieri L N, RitterA V, et al. Influence of finishing andpolishing procedures on the decisionto replace old amalgam restorations:an in vitro study. Quintessence Int1996 27: 833–840.50. Dunne S M. The limitation of visualperception in restorative dentistry.Dent Update 1993 20: 198–205.51. Dunninger P, Einwag J, Sitter H.Reproduzierbarkeit von Messungenzur Ergebnisqualität zahnärztlicherFüllungen. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 199146: 212–214.52. Kidd E A, Ricketts D N, Pitts N B.Occlusal caries diagnosis: a changingchallenge for clinicians and epidemiologists.J Dent 1993 21: 323–33153. Pitts N B. Diagnostic tools andmeasurements – impact on appropriatecare. Community Dent OralEpidemiol 1997 25: 24–35.54. Horn D J, Bulan-Brady J, Hicks M L.Sphere spectrophotometer versushuman evaluation of tooth shade. JEndod 1998 24: 786–790.55. Kay E J, Blinkhorn A S. A qualitativeinvestigation of factors governingdentists’ treatment philosophies.Br Dent J 1996 180: 171–176.56. Hawthorne W S, Smales R J. Factorsaffecting the amount of long-termrestorative dental treatment providedto 100 patients by 20 dentists in 3Adelaide private practices. Aust DentJ 1996 41: 256–259.57. Paterson F M, Paterson R C, WattsA, et al. Initial stages in the developmentof valid criteria for the replacementof amalgam restorations. J Dent1995 23: 137–143.58. el-Mowafy O M, Lewis D W.Restorative decision making byOntario dentists. J Can Dent Assoc1994 60: 305–306.59. Bader J D, Shugars D A. Agreementamong dentists’ recommendationsfor restorative treatment. J Dent Res1993 72: 891–896.60. Bader J D, Shugars D A. Understandingdentists’ restorative treatmentdecisions. J Public Health Dent 199252: 102–110.61. Drake C W, Maryniuk G A, BentleyC. Reasons for restoration replacement:differences in practice patterns.Quintessence Int 1990 21: 125–130.62. Worthington H, Holloway P,Clarkson J, et al. Predicting whichadult patients will need treatmentover the next year. Community DentOral Epidemiol 1997 25: 273–277.63. Jacobsen P H. Design and analysis ofclinical trials. J Dent 1988 16: 215–218.64. Fédération Dentaire Internationale.Recommendations for clinicalresearch protocols for dental materials.Int Dent J 1982 32: 403–423.65. National Institutes of Health, ADAand FDA. Wychoff H D, Weigl D G.(eds). Clinical Evaluation of DentalMaterials. Bethesda: National Institutesof Health Publication 1980,publication no. NIH 80–117.66. ADA Council on Dental Materialsand Devices. Recommended standardpractices for clinical researchprotocol for dental materials anddevices. J Am Dent Assoc 1972 84:388–390.67. ADA Council on Dental Materials,Instrument, and Equipment. AmericanDental Association Guidelines forSubmission of Composite Resin Materialsfor Occlusal Class I and Class IIRestorations. Chicago: American DentalAssociation, 1989.68. ADA Council on Dental Materials,Instruments, and Equipment. AmericanDental Association Acceptance Programfor Dentin Adhesive Materials andEnamel and Dentin Adhesive Materials.Chicago: American Dental Association,1994.69. Letzel H, van ‘t Hof M A, MarshallG W, et al. The influence of theamalgam alloy on the survival ofamalgam restorations: a secondaryanalysis of multiple controlled clinicaltrials. J Dent Res 1997 76: 1787–1798.70. Tyas M J. Dental materials science –the maintenance of standards. J OralRehabil 1992 18: 105–110.71. NIDR, National Institute of DentalResearch. Broadening the scope – longrange research plan for the nineties.Bethesda: US Department of Healthand Human Services 1990, publicationno. NIH 90–1188.72. Letzel H. Survival rates and reasonsfor failure of posterior compositerestorations in multicentre clinicaltrial. J Dent 1989 17 (Suppl 1): S10–S17.73. Wilson N H F. The evaluation ofmaterials: relationship between laboratoryinvestigations and clinicalstudies. Oper Dent 1990 15: 149–155.74. Altman D G. Practical Statistics forMedical Research. pp 455–460.London: Chapman & Hall, 1991.75. Mair L H. Understanding wear indentistry. Compend Contin Educ Dent1999 20: 19–26.76. Dahl B L, Carlsson G E, Ekfeldt A.Occlusal wear of teeth and restorativematerials. A review of classification,etiology, mechanisms of wear,and some aspects of restorative procedures.Acta Odontol Scand 1993 51:299–311.77. Freilich M A, Goldberg A J,Gilpatrick R O, et al. Direct andindirect evaluation of posterior compositerestorations at three years.Dent Mater 1992 8: 60–64.78. Wilson N H F, Wilson M A, WastellD G, et al. Performance of Occlusinin butt-joint and bevel-edged preparations:Five year results. Dent Mater1991 7: 92–98.79. Lutz F, Phillips R W, Roulet J F, etal. In vivo and in vitro wear ofpotential posterior composites. JDent Res 1984 63: 914–920.80. Mair L H, Vowles R W, CunninghamJ, et al. The clinical wear of threeposterior composites. Br Dent J 1990169: 355–360.81. Ratanapridakul K, Leinfelder K F,Thomas J. Effects of finishing on thein vivo wear rate of a posterior compositeresin. J Am Dent Assoc 1989118: 333–335.82. Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vuylsteke-Wauters M, et al. Quantitative invivo wear of human enamel. J DentRes 1989 68: 1752–1754.83. Johnson G H, Bales D J, Gordon GE, et al. Clinical performance ofposterior composite resin restora-International Dental Journal (2001) Vol. 51/No.3