13.07.2015 Views

Financial Accounting Series

Financial Accounting Series

Financial Accounting Series

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

transactions from similar transactions that would be included in the scope ofStatement 19 because joint venture is not defined robustly in current guidance. Themajority of respondents agreed with that decision, and the Board affirmed it in itsredeliberations.A19. Transfers of <strong>Financial</strong> Assets. The Exposure Draft proposed amending bothOpinion 29 and Statement 140 to clarify that a transfer of an equity method investmentfor a similar productive asset should be accounted for in accordance with the provisionsof Statement 140. The majority of respondents agreed with that decision, and the Boardaffirmed it in its redeliberations.A20. FASB Statement No. 66, <strong>Accounting</strong> for Sales of Real Estate, provides guidanceon when to derecognize a real estate asset sold and when to recognize profit on the saleof that asset. Statement 66 states that exchanges of real estate for other real estateshould be accounted for under the provisions of Opinion 29. The Board consideredwhether to eliminate that scope exception in Statement 66 but decided not to do sobecause that Statement was designed to deal with transactions involving monetaryconsideration. The Board decided that the model established by this Statement isappropriate for evaluating exchanges of real estate for real estate.International Convergence of <strong>Accounting</strong> StandardsA21. Although one objective of issuing this Statement is to further the Board’sconvergence efforts with the IASB, as discussed below, some differences in accountingfor nonmonetary exchanges have not been eliminated by this Statement.A22. The FASB noted that the exception in Opinion 29 for exchanges in which the fairvalue is not determinable within reasonable limits has the same intent as the IASB’sexception for nonmonetary asset exchanges in which the fair value of the assetsexchanged is not reliably measurable. The Board decided to retain its currentterminology pending completion of its project on fair value measurement.A23. Opinion 29 provides guidance for measuring the effects of exchanges ofnonmonetary assets. IAS 16 and IAS 38 provide guidance for assessing the effects ofexchanges of property, plant, and equipment and intangible assets. Both Boardsacknowledge that those differences will likely result in scope differences between theBoards’ standards for nonmonetary exchanges. The FASB and the IASB have agreedto use an iterative process to converge the scope of their guidance for nonmonetaryexchanges. Under that process, the IASB issued its standard for nonmonetary assetexchanges with a narrower scope than this Statement. This Statement incorporatesimprovements in the notion of commercial substance as that term is used in IAS 16.14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!