13.07.2015 Views

Criminology and Sociology - Liverpool John Moores University

Criminology and Sociology - Liverpool John Moores University

Criminology and Sociology - Liverpool John Moores University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Liaison with Counselling <strong>and</strong> Careers Services24 hour access to Learning Resource Centre with IT, E-mail <strong>and</strong> Internet facilitiesStudent interest <strong>and</strong> paticipation is encouraged through a variety of means including:Clear direction on what is required through module h<strong>and</strong>booksUse of E learning via programme Blackboard strategyEncouragement of interactive debate, questioning <strong>and</strong> raising of problems in classesA varied programme of assessmentsHelping students to address learning problems through mid-semester <strong>and</strong> mid-year progress reviews.16 Methods for evaluating <strong>and</strong> improving the quality <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards of teaching <strong>and</strong> learningMechanisms for review <strong>and</strong> evaluation of teaching, learning <strong>and</strong> assessment, the curriculum <strong>and</strong> outcomest<strong>and</strong>ards;Module Reviews (module appraisal questionnaires, student reps reports, module leader reports)Annual Programme Self-Assessment <strong>and</strong> Action Document (PSAAD)Programme ReviewAdvice from School's Teaching & Learning Co-Ordinator <strong>and</strong> Faculty LearningDevelopment ManagerAnnual Personal Development <strong>and</strong> Performance Review (PDPR)Peer Review <strong>and</strong> observation of teachingExternal examiner's reportsCommittees with responsibillity for monitoring <strong>and</strong> evaluating quality <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ardsProgramme Board of StudiesSchool Academic Review CommitteeFaculty Quality Committee<strong>University</strong> Quality <strong>and</strong> St<strong>and</strong>ards CommitteeModule Assessment BoardsProgramme Assessment BoardsSchool Accreditation CommitteePersonal Mitigating Circumstances CommitteeProgramme team staff meetingsMechanisms for gaining student feedback on the quality of teaching <strong>and</strong> their learning experienceStudent Staff Liaison Committee (or Student Council meetings)Student representation at the Programme Board of StudiesModule appraisal questionnaires <strong>and</strong> student reps module reportsInformal feedback to module tutors, personal tutors <strong>and</strong> the head of departmentJMU Student Satisfaction SurveyNational Student SurveySubject st<strong>and</strong>ards for all taught programmes of study are specified using an outcome based learning model.Attainment is measured against the st<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>and</strong> individual student performance is moderated at assessmentboards. This involves both internal moderation (by LJMU staff <strong>and</strong>/or partner institution staff) <strong>and</strong> externalmoderation (by External Examiners). Internal annual programme self-assessment is informed by broad rangingstudent feedback, external examiners <strong>and</strong> academic staff who conduct module review. External qualityassessment by Professional Statutory Regulatory Bodies <strong>and</strong> the Quality Assurance Agency for HigherEducation confirms that st<strong>and</strong>ards are set at the appropriate level <strong>and</strong> that quality of learning opportunities aresubject to continuing improvement. The quality of teaching is assured through staff review <strong>and</strong> staff developmentin learning, teaching <strong>and</strong> assessment. Designated committees have responsibility for the oversight of processeswherein quality <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards are evaluated <strong>and</strong> improved.Please note: This specification provides a concise summary of the main features of the programme <strong>and</strong> thelearning outcomes that a typical student might reasonably be expected to achieve <strong>and</strong> demonstrate if he/sheProgramme: 21566-2000001635 Plan: 02.01 Start date of programme - plan: 01-AUG-09

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!