13.07.2015 Views

Products of CM elliptic curves - Universität Duisburg-Essen

Products of CM elliptic curves - Universität Duisburg-Essen

Products of CM elliptic curves - Universität Duisburg-Essen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Theorem 58 Let E/K be a <strong>CM</strong> <strong>elliptic</strong> curve, where K is an algebraically closedfield. If A ∼ E n is an abelian variety which is isogenous to E n , then there exist<strong>elliptic</strong> <strong>curves</strong> E 1 , . . . , E n ∼ E such that A ≃ E 1 × . . . × E n .Remark 59 In the case that K = C, Theorem 58 was first proven by Lange[19], usingthe results <strong>of</strong> Shioda and Mitani[24] (who proved the case n = 2). A different pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>this was given by Schoen; cf. [22], Satz 2.4. His pro<strong>of</strong> is based on the above Theorem45(b) <strong>of</strong> Borevich and Faddeev[1] and hence is closely related to the one given below(in the case K = C).In his paper, Schoen[22] also proves the following interesting “converse” to Theorem58 in the case K = C. Suppose that A/C is an abelian variety with the property thatif B ∼ A, then B ≃ A 1 × . . . × A n , for some simple abelian varieties A i . Then eitherA is simple or A ∼ E n , where E/C is a <strong>CM</strong> <strong>elliptic</strong> curve.Before proving Theorem 58, let us see how Theorem 54 follows from it.Pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> Theorem 54 (using Theorem 58). First note that the second equivalence<strong>of</strong> (97) is trivial because we have End(E) = Z(End(E n )) ⊂ E(H) ⇔ End(E) ⊂Z(E(H)) ⇔ f E(H) |f E .Next we note that the one direction (⇒) <strong>of</strong> the first equivalence <strong>of</strong> (97) is true byCorollary 11. It thus remains to prove the other direction.Thus, suppose that Z(End(E n )) ⊂ E(H). Since E is a <strong>CM</strong> <strong>elliptic</strong> curve, we havethat End(E n ) = End(E n ⊗ K), and hence also that End(A) = End(A ⊗ K). (Tosee this, note that End 0 (E n ) = End 0 (A) (because A ∼ E n ), and that End 0 (E n ) =End 0 (E n ⊗ K), and so the assertion follows because End(A ⊗ K)/End(A) is alwaystorsionfree.) Thus, we have that E(H ⊗ K) ≃ End(A ⊗ K) = End(A) ≃ E(H), and soZ(End(E n ⊗ K)) ⊂ Z(E(H ⊗ K)). Thus f AH⊗K = f E(H⊗K) |f E⊗K = f E .By Theorem 58 we have that A H⊗K ≃ E 1 ×. . .×E n , for some <strong>elliptic</strong> <strong>curves</strong> E i /K.By Corollary 53 we have f Ei |f AH⊗K |f E , and so E i ∈ Isog + (E ⊗K/K). Thus, condition(101) holds for H ⊗ K, and so H ⊗ K is an ideal subgroup <strong>of</strong> (E ⊗ K) n = E n ⊗ K byProposition 57. It thus follows from Remark 7(d) that H is an ideal subgroup <strong>of</strong> E n .Pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> Theorem 58. We shall divide the pro<strong>of</strong> into several cases.Case 1. K = C.Here E ≃ E L , where L ∈ Lat F is a lattice in F = End 0 (E); cf. §3.2. Thus E n ≃ C n /L n ,where L n = L ⊕ . . . ⊕ L ⊂ F n . Let π : E n → A be an isogeny. Then Ker(π) = L ′ /L n ,for some subgroup L ′ ⊂ C n . Since [L ′ : L n ] = deg(π) < ∞, it follows that L ′ is a latticein F n (in particular, L ′ ⊂ F n ) and hence by Corollary 47 we know that L ′ has the form(91). Put L ′′ = L ′ 1 ⊕ . . . ⊕ L ′ n ⊂ F n , where L ′ i = R i for 1 ≤ i ≤ n − 1 and L ′ n = I andthe R i ’s and I are given by (91). Thus L ′ = L ′′ g, for some g ∈ Aut F (F n ) ⊂ Aut C (C n ),and so A ≃ C n /L ′ ≃ C n /L ′′ ≃ C/L ′ 1 ×. . .×C/L ′ n, and so the assertion follows becauseL ′ i ∈ Lat F (and hence C/L ′ i ∼ E L ).44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!