13.07.2015 Views

Khasho August September 2010 - National Prosecuting Authority

Khasho August September 2010 - National Prosecuting Authority

Khasho August September 2010 - National Prosecuting Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8 NPA PerformanceMan gets 2 life sentences in Pietermaritzburg High CourtNatasha RamkissonWomen and children are considered to be the most vulnerablein society. Amidst all the hype that was made during Women’sMonth, <strong>Khasho</strong> spoke to a KwaZulu Natal Advocate who hasrecently concluded a matter that only reiterates the fact thatcrimes against these vulnerable groups occur on an enormousscale and at a shocking rate. We chatted to Advocate CandyKander of the DPP Pietermaritzburg Office.1. Please provide somebackground into the case.The 11 year old deceased livednext door to Dennis Zuma (theaccused) in Plessislaer inPietermaritzburg. She went missingand the following day her bodywas found in a veldt approximately150 metres from her home. Shewas naked and had strangulationmarks around her neck. There wasa single accused and he wascharged with murder and rape.2. How long did the investigationtake?The accused was arrested a fewdays after the incident. The DNAreport was only availableapproximately after 4 months andthe trial was completed within aweek.3. How did he plead?The accused pleaded not guilty and raised the defence of analibi.4. What evidence supported the fact that he was guilty?He was last seen talking to the deceased 20 minutes before shedisappeared. The post mortem examination revealed that thedeceased had been raped and manually strangled and the DNAevidence revealed that scrapings from under the deceased’sfingernails and semen from her vagina contained the accused’sDNA.Candy Kander: Senior State Advocate5. What challenges did you face during thistrial?It was common cause that the deceased was raped andkilled. However, the defence raised a technical issuethat it was not proved when the rape had occurred i.e.before death or after death. If thecourt accepted that the accusedraped the deceased after she waskilled then he could not be convictedof rape, but only for the violation ofa corpse. The court eventually madea finding that the deceased wasraped before being killed and he wasconvicted of rape and murder.6. What did you learn from thiscase?It was an extremely sad and drainingcase. I’ve learned that evil is tangible.Not only did the accused rape and killa child, but he had a history of violentcrime. He had previous convictionsfor murder, attempted murder andculpable homicide and was out onparole when he committed this crime.7. Was there anything unique orparticularly different about thiscase?Such cases often go undetected. Thedeceased in this matter literally helped us to apprehendher assailant. Her last moments are unthinkable. It isevident from the DNA evidence that she must haveclawed at the accused as she desperately tried to fight forthe preservation of her life. The DNA evidence wasinvaluable in solving the case and securing a conviction.The Acting Judge, Z Nkosi, reprimanded Zuma sayingthat he had abused the trust that the little girl had inhim in the worst possible manner. "You raped avulnerable child to satisfy your sexual lust. You violentlysnuffed out her life, probably to hide your hideous rapeof her,” said the Acting Judge.Professionalism, Integrity, Service Excellence, Accountability and Credibility

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!