13.07.2015 Views

nisoniades somnus and notes on the occurrence of erynnis icelus in

nisoniades somnus and notes on the occurrence of erynnis icelus in

nisoniades somnus and notes on the occurrence of erynnis icelus in

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

52 JOURNAL OF THE LEPIDOPTERISTS' SOCIETYseparately). Not until <strong>the</strong> treatises <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> Hesperioidea by L<strong>in</strong>dsey(1921) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> L<strong>in</strong>dsey et al. (1931) did <strong>the</strong> Floridian reports f<strong>in</strong>ally becomeunacceptable. The fur<strong>the</strong>st south from which <strong>the</strong>se authors reported E.<strong>icelus</strong> was North Carol<strong>in</strong>a. However, <strong>the</strong> saga c<strong>on</strong>t<strong>in</strong>ued when Macy<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Shepard (1941) resurrected <strong>the</strong> Floridian reports <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Evans (1953)<strong>in</strong>dicated that <strong>the</strong> British Museum (Natural History) c<strong>on</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed E. <strong>icelus</strong>from Florida. Forbes (1960) also listed E. <strong>icelus</strong> from Florida, possibly<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> authority <strong>of</strong> Evans. Burns (1964) exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> purported Floridianspecimen <strong>of</strong> E. <strong>icelus</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> British Museum, a dateless malefrom <strong>the</strong> R. Oberthiir collecti<strong>on</strong> marked <strong>on</strong>ly as "Floride," <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>sideredit mislabelled. Burns added that "E. <strong>icelus</strong> has <strong>of</strong>ten beenattributed to Florida, chiefly <strong>in</strong> older literature; <strong>the</strong> error seems to stemfrom Edwards. Many highly questi<strong>on</strong>able locality records (<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> foodplantrecords as well) have been uncritically repeated, <strong>in</strong> literaturebear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> Erynnis, to <strong>the</strong> extent that nowadays <strong>the</strong>y may appearto be reliable, when actually <strong>the</strong>y are not." Although Kimball (1965)<strong>in</strong>cluded a c<strong>on</strong>temporary record (1961) <strong>of</strong> E. <strong>icelus</strong> from <strong>the</strong> Floridapanh<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>le (determ<strong>in</strong>ed by W. T. M. Forbes as "apparently this") heretorted "I am much <strong>in</strong> doubt as to whe<strong>the</strong>r this species is really nativeto Florida."The basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> early reports <strong>of</strong> E. <strong>icelus</strong> <strong>in</strong> Florida probably canbe traced to a small female specimen <strong>of</strong> E. h. <str<strong>on</strong>g>somnus</str<strong>on</strong>g> from <strong>the</strong> W. H.Edwards collecti<strong>on</strong> labelled "Nis<strong>on</strong>iades/<strong>icelus</strong>(?)/L<strong>in</strong>tn./2/Ind. Riv."<strong>in</strong> Edwards' h<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>. The specimen was undoubtedly collected by <strong>the</strong>Wittfelds at Georgiana, Brevard County, Florida at about <strong>the</strong> sametime <strong>the</strong> types <strong>of</strong> Nis<strong>on</strong>iades <str<strong>on</strong>g>somnus</str<strong>on</strong>g> were collected (ca. 1880). Thissupports Sk<strong>in</strong>ner (1914) who suggested that Floridian records <strong>of</strong> E.<strong>icelus</strong> may actually be E. h. <str<strong>on</strong>g>somnus</str<strong>on</strong>g>. Improperly identified skippersare epidemic with<strong>in</strong> early collecti<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> even remotely similar specieswere c<strong>on</strong>fused. This problem is exemplified by H. G. Dyar who determ<strong>in</strong>edas E. h. <str<strong>on</strong>g>somnus</str<strong>on</strong>g> a Mississippi specimen <strong>of</strong> Erynnis zarucco(Lucas) (Burns 1964). However, this <strong>in</strong>herent identificati<strong>on</strong> problemdoes not entirely solve <strong>the</strong> Floridian E. <strong>icelus</strong> dilemma.Six male specimens <strong>of</strong> E. <strong>icelus</strong>, bear<strong>in</strong>g h<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>written <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> pr<strong>in</strong>tedlabels read<strong>in</strong>g "Fla" from <strong>the</strong> W. J. Holl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> collecti<strong>on</strong>, are deposited<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Carnegie Museum <strong>of</strong> Natural History (identificati<strong>on</strong>s verified bygenitalic exam<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong>). Three <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se specimens also possess h<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>writtenlabels read<strong>in</strong>g "Morris<strong>on</strong>," apparently <strong>in</strong> reference to <strong>the</strong> n<strong>in</strong>eteenthcentury collector Herbert K. Morris<strong>on</strong>. Morris<strong>on</strong> collected <strong>in</strong>Florida <strong>in</strong> 1883, 1884 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1885 (Essig 1931). Morris<strong>on</strong> also visited atleast ten o<strong>the</strong>r states between 1874 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1883 (Essig 1931), all <strong>of</strong> whichpossess valid records <strong>of</strong> E. <strong>icelus</strong> (Burns 1964). Morris<strong>on</strong> was a prolificcollector <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> such zeal <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>the</strong> potential for accidental mislabel-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!