13.07.2015 Views

Hazards - Forktruck Solutions Ltd.

Hazards - Forktruck Solutions Ltd.

Hazards - Forktruck Solutions Ltd.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SRAG - Chemical Warehouses Version 6 26 June 2002Metamitron (nitrogen containing) 600m NO2DD NO20.154.2.6 Other methods of predicting a toxic hazard rangeAssessors are likely to see several other approaches used in COMAH safety reports including: -1. Toxic substances are converted to equivalent quantities of the most toxic by multiplying by thetoxicity ratio.2. The mass of the most toxic substance in the warehouse is assumed to be equal to the totalmass of toxics.3. More than 10% of the most dangerous inventory (product of mass and toxicity) over the pastthree years is assumed to be released over 30 minutes into a passive smoke plume.All of these approaches introduce an acceptable amount of conservatism into the hazard rangecalculation, which Assessors need to balance against optimism incorporated in other parts of theconsequence analysis.4.2.6.1 Use of the Average PesticideThere is a school of thought which believes that it will never be possible to build mathematical modelsto accurately predict the hazards from a burning pesticide warehouse that contains a large number ofsubstances in different chemical and physical form and packaging arrangements. This schooltherefore recommends that the hazard analysis is based on a hypothetical "average" agrochemicalwhich releases a variety of low molecular weight toxic gases when burnt. The composition of theaverage agrochemical is determined from the molecular composition and masses of differentsubstances in the warehouses. The example shown in the table below illustrates how to calculaterelease rates of the different gases.Table 8 shows how the composition of the average agrochemical can be determined from theinventory of three agrochemicalsis: -C 8.8 H 10.9 Cl 1.54 S 1.5 N 1 O 2.1The average molecular weight is 267 and if the burning rate of material in the warehouse was 20kg/s,then 74.8mols/s would be combusted. From this the rate of release of different products is:-HCl 4.2kg/s.SO 2 7.2.NO 2 0.17.HCN 0.1.CO 19.7.A hazard range based of the addition of fractional dangerous doses is then likely to be conservativeunless the warehouse contains very large quantities of an extremely toxic substance such as phorate.Table 8: Calculation of a representative substance for an agrochemicalwarehouseQuantity50,00020,00040,000Mol.Weight322.5296.6380.5CompositionC7H7Cl3NO3PSC9H4Cl3NO2SC20H32N2O3SNo. of kgatomsCarbon1,085606.92,102.53,794.48.8No. of kgatomshydrogen1,0852,6983,3644,71910.9No. of kgatomschlorine46520206671.54No. of kgatomssulphur310134.82106551.51No. of kgatomsnitrogen15567.5210432.51No. of kgatomsoxygen465138315.59152.15 EXPLOSIONS IN WAREHOUSESSome substances are referred to as explosive because under certain conditions they are liable toundergo a rapid chemical reaction which produces large quantities of hot gas. There is not a precise

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!