The 'Second Demographic Transition' â new forms of family

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Some problems with the SDT conceptNo so much Second but secondary?Not really Demographic?Not (yet) a TransitionStatistically incoherent (in respect of fertility).Not the only available model for demographicchange (e.g. central and eastern Europe).Remains a highly influential and testablemodel.
Not Second but Secondary?Certainly a major change in behaviour. But someaspects not without precedent (Cliquet 1991).Other transitions important (e.g 16 th C. WestEuropean Marriage Pattern)In some respects a consequence of FirstDemographic Transition or a continuation of it.Data for earlier periods almost non-existent
Page 1 and 2: DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL POLICY AND SOC
Page 3 and 4: 30.029.028.027.026.0Mean age at fir
Page 5 and 6: Elements of the Second Demographic
Page 7 and 8: A hierarchy of human needs. (Abraha
Page 9 and 10: post materialist attitudes and valu
Page 11 and 12: Evidence for the SDT 2: percent eve
Page 13 and 14: Evidence for the SDT 4: Trends in b
Page 15: Evidence for the SDT 6: association
Page 19 and 20: Not a Transition?A transition is pe
Page 21 and 22: More variety: Spatial distribution
Page 23 and 24: Not reversible?1.21.1Total First Ma
Page 25 and 26: Transitions must be sustainable. Is
Page 27 and 28: An incoherent concept? Internationa
Page 29 and 30: underlying theorySDT good as empiri
Page 31 and 32: Central and Eastern Europe demograp
Page 33 and 34: 450400350300250200Post-communist tr
Page 35 and 36: Mixed messages from East Asia 2Tabl
Page 37 and 38: Mixed messages from East Asia 41401

The 'Second Demographic Transition' â new forms of family

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?

The 'Second Demographic Transition' â new forms of family