13.07.2015 Views

The effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural interventions with people ...

The effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural interventions with people ...

The effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural interventions with people ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

13AUTHOR& DATEPURPOSEDESIGN& SAMPLEOUTCOMES ANDINTERVENTIONRESULTSCONCLUSIONS &IMPLICATIONSCohen,Heinrich,Nalib<strong>of</strong>f et al.(1983)- to compare 2outpatient grouptreatment methodsfor chronic lowback pain- before-after design,treatment-outcomestudy - comparing 2groups, no randomassignment, nocontrol group.- N=25 outpatients<strong>with</strong> chronic lowback pain <strong>of</strong> at least6 months duration.- evaluations pre- andpost-treatment, n<strong>of</strong>ollow-up.- 4 domains <strong>of</strong> painexperience evaluated:physical abilities, physicalfunctioning, psychologicaland psychosocialfunctioning, and painintensity and perception.- 2 group <strong>interventions</strong>compared: physical therapytreatment and behaviourtherapy, which includedrelaxation, guided imagery,goal setting, activitymanagement, problemsolvingand assertivenesstraining.Each group 10 sessions.- significant improvementsfound in both treatmentgroups in terms <strong>of</strong> less pain,less activity limitations frompain, less psychologicaldistress, and satisfaction <strong>with</strong>treatment.- PT group demonstratedimproved low back control,but not generalization todaily activities; plussignificant decrease inoverall depression scores.- <strong>behavioural</strong> groupdemonstrated a trend towardsincreasing social andphysical activities, but notstatist. significant.- Weak support found for thehypotheses that grouptreatment would have similaroutcomes in 4 domains <strong>of</strong>pain experience; differentialeffects for each type <strong>of</strong>treatment were minimal in thisstudy.- Methodological flawsweaken strength <strong>of</strong>conclusions, in particular, nocontrol group, small samplesize.- Limited application to OTpractice due tomethodological weaknesses.Corey, Etlin &Miller (1987)- to evaluated a<strong>cognitive</strong><strong>behavioural</strong>treatment programfor <strong>people</strong> <strong>with</strong>chronic pain,conducted in theirhomes- before-after design,program evaluation,no control group.- N=72 subjectsreferred to one clinic;variety <strong>of</strong> diagnoses.All had not workeddue to pain for amean <strong>of</strong> 28 months.- evaluationsconducted before andimmediately aftertreatment, and onefollow up, avg. 18months afterdischarge.- outcomes focused on workstatus,; pain reduction,functioning level andcoping ability were reportedsubjectively by subjectspost-treatment and onfollow-up.- <strong>cognitive</strong>-<strong>behavioural</strong>programme includededucation about painmanagement, coping skills,stress mngmnt., exerciseand lifestyle restructuring,<strong>behavioural</strong> techniques,meds. reduction and sleepscheduling techniques. Inhomevisits avgd. 2x/weekinitially, to 1x/month, for 5mos.- 70% <strong>of</strong> subjects hadreturned to some form <strong>of</strong>work or re-trainingimmediately after treatmentand on follow-up.- subjective reports <strong>of</strong> painreduction indicated thatsubjects who returned tosome form <strong>of</strong> work reporteda mean percent <strong>of</strong> painreduction <strong>of</strong> 32 - 79%, aswell as a range <strong>of</strong> 27 - 77%increase in functioning and27 - 82% increase in copingability. In comparison, thosesubjects not workingreported a range <strong>of</strong> 2.5-11%pain reduction, 3-7%functioning increase, and 6-8% increase in coping.- Outcomes indicate positivebenefits <strong>of</strong> a <strong>cognitive</strong><strong>behavioural</strong>programme for<strong>people</strong> <strong>with</strong> chronic pain.- Results are not conclusivedue to weak methodology, nocontrol group.- Self-report measures werefound to be highly associated<strong>with</strong> a more objective measure<strong>of</strong> functioning - work status.- sSrengths <strong>of</strong> programme areworthy <strong>of</strong> OT’s attention:home setting, involvement <strong>of</strong>families, individualizedtreatment and focus onactivity.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!