Minerals Extraction and Archaeology: A Practice Guide - CBI

Mineral Extractionand Archaeology:A Practice Guide

This document has been prepared by the Minerals and Historic Environment Forum as anaid to planning authorities, mineral planners, mineral operators, archaeologists and consultants.It provides guidance specifically for dealing with archaeological remains as part of mineraldevelopment through the planning process.The principal purpose of this Practice Guide is toprovide clear and practical guidance on the archaeological evaluation of mineral development sites,particularly for the determination of individual planning applications for minerals development.It should ensure that adequate information is acquired in a cost-effective way so that an informedplanning decision can be made.The guide also provides some information on the mitigationtechniques that could be employed.Government planning policy relating to archaeology and mineral extraction is set out in MineralPolicy Statement 1 (DCLG 2006a) and Planning Policy Guidance Note 16 (DoE 1990). EnglishHeritage’s policy towards mineral extraction can be found in Mineral Extraction and the HistoricEnvironment (2008a).This Practice Guide builds on the CBI Archaeological Investigations Codeof Practice (1991) with the aim of ensuring that planning decisions are informed by investigationsthat are proportionate to the archaeological potential of a site, and reasonable in all other respects.This Practice Guide deals specifically with land-based mineral extraction in England. It is confined toarchaeological considerations and does not cover standing buildings for which other guidance exists.Good practice for mineral extraction and archaeology in the marine environment is dealt withelsewhere (BMAPA/EH 2003), as is a strategy for dealing with archaeology in relation to peatextraction (English Heritage 2002c).The guide was authored by Clive Waddington ofArchaeological Research Services Ltd on behalfof the Minerals and Historic Environment Forumthat includes:Association of Local Government ArchaeologicalOfficers: EnglandBritish Aggregates AssociationConfederation of British Industry Minerals GroupEnglish HeritageInstitute of Field ArchaeologistsMining Association of the UKPlanning Officers SocietyQuarry Products AssociationStanding Committee of Archaeological Unit ManagersThe Practice Guide carries the endorsement of all theorganisations represented on the Forum and each iscommitted to promoting the practices it contains.The Forumcontinues to meet to discuss issues relating to archaeologicalpractice and mineral extraction and promote good practice.It can contacted by writing to the address below.The Minerals and Historic Environment Forumc/o The Executive SecretaryCBI Minerals GroupCentre Point103 New Oxford StreetLondonWC1A 1DUThe writing and production of this guidance was supportedby the Aggregates Levy Sustainability Fund distributedby English Heritage on behalf of the Department forEnvironment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra).Cover: Excavation in progress on a Bronze Age roundhouse at Lanton Quarry, Northumberland. © Archaeological Research Services Ltd1

CONTENTSpageIntroduction 3Agreed basis for the guide 4The planning process 8Overview 8Local Development Frameworks 8Planning applications 10Screening 10Scoping 11Environmental impact assessment and 12pre-determination measuresDetermination 14Post-permission mitigation measures 14Techniques 17Aerial photography 17Archaeological survey 18Desk-based assessment 19Evaluation trenching 19Excavation 21Fieldwalking 22Geomorphological mapping 22Geophysical survey and remote sensing 23Palaeoenvironmental analysis 24Post-excavation, archive and dissemination 25Sediment analysis 26Strip, map and sample 27Test pits 28Watching brief 28References and key publications 29Sources of useful informationand adviceBack page2

AGREED BASIS FOR THE GUIDE5 The Forum agrees that:• A steady, adequate and sustainable supply of mineralsis essential to the nation’s prosperity, infrastructureand quality of life.• Minerals are finite and irreplaceable resources thatcan only be worked where they occur. Proposals forthe extraction of those resources will only proceedif the minerals operator considers the commercialrisk acceptable.• Archaeological remains are a finite and irreplaceableresource that may occur anywhere. In many casesthey are highly fragile and vulnerable to damageand destruction.• Archaeological resources are not all equal in value;those of international or national importance requirethe highest level of protection from competingdevelopment. Equally, few archaeological resourcesare without value and this can sometimes only beestablished by investigation.• It is the role of the planning system to reconcile theneeds of the historic environment and mineralsdevelopment in the context of sustainabledevelopment.These points are explained more fully below.A steady, adequate and sustainable supply ofminerals is essential6 ‘Minerals are essential to the nation’s prosperity andquality of life, not least in helping to create and developsustainable communities. It is essential that there is anadequate and steady supply of material to providethe infrastructure, buildings and goods that society,industry and the economy needs but that this provisionis made in accordance with the principles of sustainabledevelopment’, Minerals Policy Statement 1, paragraph 1(MPS1, DCLG 2006a).Minerals are finite and irreplaceable resources7 Mineral extraction can only occur where viableminerals are found. In that respect it is different frommost other forms of development in that the scope forconsidering alternative locations is limited by geology.Thisis especially true in the case of less abundant mineralssuch as coal, industrial minerals, silica sand and distinctivebuilding stone which themselves may be locally, regionallyor nationally important.What is often forgotten is thatalthough recyclable, primary minerals are finite andirreplaceable; in the context of sustainability, it is essentialto secure their prudent and efficient use and to preventneedless sterilisation of mineral resources.Archaeological remains are a finite andirreplaceable resource8 The removal of archaeological remains is an irreversibleprocess; once they have been removed they cannever be replaced. Humans have occupied England fromas far back as 700,000 years ago, and continuously sincethe last Ice Age around 13,000 years ago. Evidence ofhuman activity can be recognised in different forms andat different scales, ranging from the very local to wholelandscapes. Between areas, however, there can be largevariations in the number and type of archaeologicalremains.There is also likely to be a relationship betweenthe origin and age of a landform, the history of itssubsequent use by people, the likely characteristicsof any archaeological remains and the probability ofthem surviving.9 For example, remains are often abundant on sand andgravel terraces.This is because these areas are typicallyfree-draining and fertile, and were consequently favouredas locations for Neolithic monuments, later prehistoricand Roman settlements and field systems and Anglo-Saxon settlements. In hard-rock areas with little orno drift cover, the archaeological associations may bedifferent, typically comprising upstanding stone cairns,standing stones, house platforms, field systems, prehistoricrock art, rock shelters, cave sites and artefact scatters.Another important relationship between a landformand its archaeological potential is the occurrence ofPalaeolithic material – typically flint tools and faunalremains, such as mammoth bones – within sandand gravel deposits themselves.The likelihood ofencountering such remains depends on both the ageof the landform unit and the circumstances of itsdeposition. In some cases monitoring of archaeologicallysensitive deposits may form an important part ofa mitigation strategy, although the in situ preservationof such Palaeolithic remains will rarely be practicalor justified.4

454 Dix Quarry, Stanton Harcourt,Oxfordshire: archaeologistsexcavate remains of mammothsand stone tools dating back to apreviously unknown warm interglacialepisode 200,000 years ago.© Hanson Aggregates5 Excavation of a prehistoric pitalignment at Barrow upon Trent,Derbyshire. © Trent & PeakArchaeologyapplication.Whenever possible, it should also alertprospective developers to any archaeological issues thatwill need to be addressed in respect of allocated sites.Areas of higher and lower archaeological potentialshould normally be defined within the LDF to ensurethat planning authorities give appropriate considerationto archaeology when identifying future working areas.The better the quality of the information available, thegreater the certainty with which those locations may beidentified and the lower the potential risks to all partiesand to the archaeological resource. Planning authoritiesshould consult local authority archaeological curatorsto ensure they are provided with the information andadvice needed to inform and underpin the LDF. Furtheradvice on the archaeological input to LDFs is includedin the relevant section below (paras 24–29).18 Early identification of the potential impacts of aproposed development is a key element in workingtowards the goal of achieving sustainable mineralsdevelopment and appropriate treatment ofarchaeological remains. Applicants are stronglyrecommended to engage in pre-application discussionsas a way of helping them to formulate their proposals.Applications that are not supported by adequateinformation can take longer to determine, becausefurther information will need to be provided.19 Sometimes the planning authority will decide that apre-determination archaeological evaluation is neededbefore an informed and reasonable decision can betaken on an application.This evaluation should drawon field techniques appropriate to the landforms andtypes of archaeology expected. In addition, it shoulduse Historic Landscape Character data, available fromsome HERs, to contextualize the site more widely intothe landscape.The brief for a pre-determinationprogramme of work should be developed by the localauthority archaeological curator in discussion withthe consultant or contractor acting on behalf of thedeveloper, in accordance with the detail in paragraphs32–37 of this Practice Guide.The programme shouldbe consistent with best practice across the country,proportionate to the archaeological potential of the siteand reasonable in all other respects. PPG 16, paragraph21, states that pre-determination evaluation is ‘normallya rapid and inexpensive operation’ (relative to theoverall scale of the operation) which helps to definethe character and extent of the archaeological remainsthat exist in the area of a proposed development.Theavailability of this information early in the process is animportant risk management tool that will give the6

developer and the curator a clearer indication of thearchaeological potential of the site and thereby minimisethe possibility of the unexpected. In most instances,evaluations are also the key to identifying the order ofcosts involved in dealing with any remains. If a site isto be developed in phases over a long period of timethere is merit in the developer producing a site strategyor masterplan, particularly if a number of differentarchaeological contractors become involved over thelife of the site.20 An archaeological assessment of the proposeddevelopment, including the findings of any initialinvestigations, should be incorporated within anyEnvironmental Impact Assessment (EIA, see paras32–5) accompanying the planning application. Furtherinformation on the EIA process and content can befound on the websites of Planarch and the EIA Centre.The developer should be prepared for the planningauthority to ask for additional investigation in the lightof information gathered by the initial work.This isentirely reasonable, provided that it is consistent withthe requirements set out in paragraph 19 above andPPG 16 paragraph 21.21 If planning permission is granted, this may be subjectto further archaeological work being undertaken or arequirement to preserve in situ remains identified duringpre-determination evaluation. Further details of measuresthat can be specified through planning conditions andother obligations are contained in the section on Post-Permission Mitigation Measures (paras 38–44).676 Hunterhuegh Crags,Northumberland: after quarryingof rock outcrops in the earlyBronze Age this carving wasmade on the new surface. ©Archaeological Research Services Ltd7 Cheviot Quarry,Northumberland: archaeologistsexcavating the interior of aBronze Age roundhouse that wasaccurately dated to the 10thcentury BC. © ArchaeologicalResearch Services Ltd8 View towards the visitor centreand wetlands at AttenboroughQuarry, Beeston, Nottinghamshire,where much of the site hasbeen restored and is activelyused by community groups.© Tim Cooper, Arcus87

THE PLANNING PROCESSOverview22 The policies and proposals that are the basis ofthe Development Plan are contained in the RegionalSpatial Strategy and Local Development Frameworksappropriate to that area (which may, in the case of thosedocuments specific to minerals, be referred to as MineralDevelopment Frameworks or MDFs). All planningapplications must be determined in accordance withthe Development Plan unless material considerationsindicate otherwise. Consequently it is essential that thebest available archaeological information is used whenthe LDFs are being drafted and consulted upon. Inparticular, at the LDF stage the planning authorityshould seek archaeological input from local authorityarchaeological curators that will assist in identifying areasof potential archaeological sensitivity. If appropriatepolicy provision is not made when a LDF is draftedit makes protection of archaeological interests muchmore difficult later, when individual planning applicationsare considered.The development of the archaeologicalcomponents of LDFs is primarily a role for localauthorities to undertake, although mineral operatorsmay assist.23 At all phases, provision for archaeological work shouldfollow a question-led approach in which clear researchgoals are linked, wherever possible, to local, regionaland national research agendas. At the pre-determinationstage, however, questions may initially relate to morebasic concerns such as the character, date and extentof archaeological remains to provide information ontheir relative importance. Later on it is particularlyimportant that any programme of work is linkedto regional research frameworks for the historicenvironment, and any other local research strategies orpolicies.The responsibility for this is shared betweenthe archaeological curator, consultant and contractor.Any programme of archaeological work will need tobe agreed by the local authority archaeological curatorand approved by the mineral planning authority inadvance of commencement.Local Development Frameworks24 A new system for producing development plans wasintroduced in 2004.The principal policies against whichminerals planning applications are considered are nowcontained in the LDF (or MDF) in place of the oldMinerals Local Plans. LDFs and MDFs are in turn madeup of a series of Local Development Documents(LDDs) that address specific aspects of land use planningfor their area. Further detail on LDDs can be foundin PPS12 and the accompanying Practice Guide(ODPM 2004).25 An important part of the new system is improvedstakeholder and public engagement in development planpreparation. Archaeological curators as key stakeholdersshould seek to ensure that they are involved in thepreparation of LDDs so that archaeological interestsare addressed.The planning authority should takeaccount of the advice provided by curators in draftingpolicies and proposals for the LDD. Ideally, areas ofknown archaeological potential should be flagged andconsidered in the LDD and, if possible, mapped, drawingon the best possible data available at the time. Paragraph15 of PPG 16 (DoE 1990) states that ‘developmentplans should include policies for the protection,enhancement and preservation of sites of archaeologicalinterest and of their settings.The proposals map shoulddefine the areas and sites to which the policies andproposals apply’. However, it must be recognised thatarchaeological knowledge of an area may not becomprehensive. By identifying areas of known potentialat the earliest opportunity the risks to archaeologicalassets, mineral operators and planning authoritiesare reduced.To ensure effective consideration ofarchaeological interests in the LDDs, it is important thatarchaeological curators have an in-depth knowledgeand understanding of the local and regional archaeologyand are appropriately resourced and supported todeliver archaeological advice.26 Table 1 summarises the input to the LDDs requiredof archaeological curators. Flagging of archaeologicallysensitive areas within LDDs is vital to protectingarchaeological interests and safeguarding developersfrom proceeding with expensive applications forsites that later present significant risks in relationto archaeological interests. Mapping at the LDDstage can often be broad-brush, however, and thedeveloper should therefore seek early advice fromthe archaeological curator.27 A useful way of providing high quality data tounderpin archaeological provision within a LDD isto map landform units and then overlay them witharchaeological data sets derived from such sourcesas aerial photographs and geophysical survey.Sometimes referred to as a ‘resource assessmentexercise’, this approach, digitally integrated into anHistoric Environment Record (HER, also known as theSites and Monuments Record or SMR), allows areas of8

PHASE1Issues andOptionsACTIONS FORARCHAEOLOGICAL CURATORSSeek to ensure all issues associatedwith archaeology are brought tothe attention of the MineralPlanning Authority (MPA) throughearly dialogue.The MPA shouldensure that no proposals are putforward that would have anunacceptable impact onarchaeological interests.99 Aggregate extraction occurs indifferent ways. For example, hereblast-hole drilling is taking placeat Tunstead limestone quarry,Derbyshire. © Tarmac Ltd10 A restored whinstone quarrythat will be brought into publicaccess at Howick, Northumberland.© Archaeological ResearchServices Ltd11 The screening and scopingphases provide an opportunityto flag the potential archaeologicalimpacts of a mineral developmentat the earliest stages of its planning.© Archaeological Research ServicesLtd2PreferredOptionsRespond to the MPA’s consultationmaking it clear which proposalswould have an impact uponarchaeological interests that wouldbe contrary to national or regionalor local policy.Where possible, putforward suggestions/alternatives forconsideration which would remedythe situation.3SubmissionRespond to the consultation notingif any of the submitted proposalsare ‘unsound’, ie that they do notpass one or more of the ‘tests ofsoundness’ set out in PPS12.Wherepossible, put forward suggestionsthat would make the policy orproposal sound from anarchaeological perspective.104SustainabilityAppraisal(integral toeach of thephases setout above)The MPA should ensure that itseeks the archaeological curator’sadvice to ensure the appraisal hasparameters that include thehistoric environment.11Table 1: Archaeological input to the Local Development Documents.archaeological potential as well as the age of differentlandforms to be explicitly identified in well-surveyedareas and to be inferred in others. Given that aerialphotography works better over some soils and typesof geology than others, additional data from techniquessuch as geophysical survey and fieldwalking can be addedto such digital maps. Research has shown that there is adirect link between certain types of landform and kinds9

12 St Keverne, Cornwall: thisroad-stone and aggregate quarrydug into the cliffs on the Lizardpeninsula has its own jetty androad access.The surrounding fieldboundaries are prehistoric in origin.© Cornwall County Council13 This late 19th-century granitequarry on Bodmin Moor is anhistoric monument in its own right.121314In reworking the quarry, careneeds to be taken to conserve theshape and character of the ‘finger’dumps that are typical of thecontemporary tramming of waste.© Cornwall County Council14 View over Dowlow andHindlow quarries, Derbyshire,on the Carboniferous Limestoneplateau. © English Heritage.NMRof archaeological and environmental remains (eg Bishop1994, Passmore et al 2002, Knight and Howard 2004,Waddington and Passmore 2006). In some instanceslandforms, such as alluvial terraces, may overlie oldersediments that contain earlier remains. Differentlandforms present different opportunities for thepreservation and evaluation of archaeological andpalaeoenvironmental remains. Understanding thesedifferences can enable identification of areas of higherand lower sensitivity, which means in turn that theresponse to proposed developments can take thisinto account. Another useful predictive tool is theHistoric Landscape Characterisation (HLC) datamaintained by some HERs, although its value will dependon the scale at which the HLC data has been mapped.28 Easily accessible high quality map-based data allowsall stakeholders involved in mineral extraction to basetheir decision-making, strategic planning and mitigationstrategies on the same set of information. However,this kind of mapped evidence requires informedinterpretation by the archaeological curator beforeareas of archaeological potential can be securely linkedto relevant policies within the LDD. For that reasonit is essential to consult the local authority archaeologicalcurator before any development proposals are drawn up.Planning applications29 Table 2 summarises the archaeological input requiredduring each phase of the planning application process.Any programme of work needs to be agreed in advancewith the archaeological curator.Screening30 Seeking a ‘screening opinion’ from the local MineralPlanning Authority (MPA) is optional for the prospectivedeveloper, but nevertheless forms part of the statutoryprocess. If one is sought then the local authority mustprovide a response. It is important, therefore, that thelocal authority has sufficient information available to giveone within the prescribed time limit. It is advantageousfor the MPA to consult the archaeological curator at thisstage, if not before, to ensure that any issues of concernare raised before a screening opinion is issued. Certaintypes and scales of mineral development will require anEnvironmental Impact Assessment (EIA), together withan Environmental Statement (ES) that details its results(for further definitions of the EIA and ES see paragraph32 below).The Town and Country Planning Regulations(DETR 1999f) and Circular 02/99 (DETR 1999a) set outthe circumstances when planning applications require anEIA.The information contained in an ES will be taken10

PLANNINGPHASE1Screening2Scoping3Predeterminationand EIAARCHAEOLOGICAL INPUTSScreening is a formal process whichdetermines whether or not aplanning application should beaccompanied by an EIA (in mostcases minerals extraction applicantswill submit one). A ‘screeningopinion’ must be provided bythe planning authority if this isrequested by the applicant. It isadvantageous for the MPA toconsult archaeological curatorsas part of this phase.This is the process of determiningwhat should be included in theEIA. Scoping will invariably identify:the need for an environmentalstatement on the historicenvironment, the elementswhich need to be considered(eg buried remains, earthworks,palaeoenvironmental remains,historic landscape characteretc), appropriate methods forassessing the potential impactsof development, and the proposedmitigation measures. Archaeologicalcurators should be consultedby the MPA and the mineraldeveloper.The EIA process must becompleted before submission ofthe planning application. Duringthis phase a range of techniquesshould be used to collect sufficientdata to identify the significantarchaeological effects of thedevelopment, as well anyconsequent mitigation measuresthat may need to be designed.The starting point for the historicenvironment component of theEIA is typically a desk-basedassessment, from which otherpre-determination measuresmay follow.4Determination5PostdeterminationmeasuresThe chosen investigative techniquesshould meet clearly definedarchaeological objectives and besuited to the nature of thelandform and the type ofarchaeology anticipated.Archaeological curators should beconsulted by the MPA and themineral developer.At this stage a decision is takenon whether the development isto be approved, and what planningconditions or obligations in relationto the historic environmentshould be attached.The MPAshould obtain advice from thearchaeological curator beforecoming to a decision.The measures taken at this stagecould range from no further workbeing required, through excavationand recording (including specialistanalysis, publication and archiving),to preservation in situ ofarchaeological remains.Thearchaeological curator has the roleof monitoring any archaeologicalmitigation works.Table 2: Archaeological input to the planning application process.into account in determining the proposal. If applicantsconsider that their proposals are likely to require an EIAthey should seek guidance at the screening stage on theneed for an EIA (ie a ‘screening opinion’). All submittedplanning applications will be screened and applicantsadvised if an ES is required, if not already submitted.Scoping31 Before making a planning application, a developermay ask the planning authority for its formal opinionon the information to be supplied in the EnvironmentalStatement (a ‘scoping opinion’).This allows the developerto be clear about what the planning authority considersthe main effects of the development are likely to beand therefore the topics on which the ES should focus.The planning authority should consult its archaeologicalcurator at this stage to ensure that any issues of concernare raised at the earliest opportunity. Even if consultation11

15 An effective mitigationprogramme will ensure thatarchaeological remains are properlyrecorded so that the resultinginformation can enhance ourunderstanding of the past, as inthe case of the Neolithic materialdiscovered here at Cheviot Quarry,Northumberland. © Tarmac Ltd151616 Excavation of a Romancorn-drying kiln at Denham,Buckinghamshire. ©Buckinghamshire County Councilof the HER shows that no archaeological remains areknown from the application site, this does not necessarilymean that it is without significant archaeological potential.English Heritage may be a statutory consultee in certaincircumstances. PPG 16 (DoE 1990) states that earlyconsultation with historic environment curators is highlydesirable as a means of agreeing the methods to beused in all archaeological work beyond the scoping stage.The key questions that should be asked at this stage arewhat are the likely archaeological impacts and how canthese be mitigated?Environmental Impact Assessment andpre-determination measures32 If the scoping process has identified archaeologicalissues, archaeological investigation should be included aspart of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) inorder to assess what impacts need to be addressedand how they can be mitigated.The historic environmentis an important consideration in any EIA.The basicstructure of the EIA process as defined by the EuropeanUnion Directive (85/337/EC updated 1997) has beenincorporated very closely into UK legislation througha series of regulations or ‘statutory instruments’.Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is a procedurethat ensures that the environmental consequences ofcertain projects are identified and assessed before anyauthorisation, such as a planning permission, is given.Proposals that must be subject to EIA are those whichare likely to have significant effects on the environmentby virtue of their nature, size or location. In practicemost planning applications for mineral extraction willrequire an EIA.The term ‘Environmental Statement’(ES) is often used to refer to the key document thatresults from the EIA information-gathering process.Thepreparation of the ES is often the point at which thepre-determination stage is formalised and this is where amineral developer's responsibilities formally commence.33 A useful set of guiding principles is set out inPLANARCH 2. PLANARCH is a partnershipestablished to further the integration of archaeologywithin the planning process in North West Europe .PLANARCH 2 identified good archaeological practicebased on experience of EIA implementation across partsof the EU.The operational principles are intended toprovide a rigorous, robust and reasonable framework forensuring that the historic environment is appropriatelytreated in the EIA process.They have been arrived atfollowing a review of current practice across parts ofEngland and North West Europe as part of thePLANARCH project.12

TECHNIQUELOCALDEVELOPMENTFRAMEWORKPRE-DETERMINATIONPOST-DETERMINATIONPOST-EXCAVATIONANDDISSEMINATIONAerial photograph transcriptionArchaeological surveyDesk-based assessmentEvaluation trenchingExcavationFieldwalkingGeomorphological mappingGeophysical surveyPalaeoenvironmental analysisPost-excavation, archiveand dissemination•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••Sediment coringStrip, map and sampleTest pitsWatching brief••••••••••••••••••Table 3: Relative frequency with which archaeological techniques are used at different phases of the planning process.34 No single technique exists that can identify allarchaeological remains.There is a range of establishedtechniques that is used to evaluate and recordarchaeological and palaeoenvironmental deposits (seeTechniques section below). Some of these allow thedetection of sites (eg aerial photography, fieldwalking,geophysics) while others are used to make a moredetailed record of structures and deposits (eg surveyingand test pits). Evaluating an area deemed to bearchaeologically sensitive usually requires a combinationof techniques appropriate to the type of landform andpotential archaeology that may be encountered. Forexample, linear evaluation trenches are generally effectivefor finding continuous features such as field systems,enclosures, forts or large ring ditches (Hey and Lacey2001, 59). Conversely, they are poorly suited to findingdispersed, small or non-continuous remains such aspost-built buildings, pits or hearths.The quality of predeterminationarchaeological information requiredfor proposed mineral developments is a significantconsideration for developers and curators because thereis usually limited potential for amending permissions totake account of nationally important archaeologicalremains should these be found post-determination.35 Evaluation of the historic environment componentof a proposed development site is undertakenincrementally using an appropriate selection of thetechniques set out in Table 3 and based on effectivedialogue between the developer and curator.The firstpiece of pre-determination work is usually the deskbasedassessment.This is a crucial task and it is in theinterests of the mineral operator and local authoritythat it is undertaken by an appropriately qualifiedand experienced archaeologist. A good desk-basedassessment is a cost-effective investment that will reducerisk, whereas a poor assessment can lead to unexpectedcosts and delay. For certain types of mineral workings itis also important to consider the impact of any enablingworks (eg access roads, processing plants etc), thepotential for subterranean remains (eg old mineworkings) as well as potential Palaeolithic remains withinthe mineral body itself. Any programme of predeterminationarchaeological works should be agreedwith the archaeological curator and approved by themineral planning authority in advance ofcommencement.13

KEY PRE-DETERMINATIONTECHNIQUESAerial photographtranscriptionArchaeologicalsurveyDesk-basedassessmentEvaluationtrenchingFieldwalkingGeomorphologicalmappingGeophysical surveySediment coringTest pitsWHAT CAN IT DELIVER?Useful for discovering large sites.This may take the form of atopographic survey of upstandingfeatures, a contour survey orrapid walkover survey to identifyany surviving upstanding features.In-depth synthesis of existingdata and prediction of the typeof archaeological remains thatcould be expected to occur, orbe impacted upon.Invasive technique that allows theextent and character of subsurfaceremains to be identifiedand assessed.Rapid coverage over largeploughed areas virtually theonly technique that provides arecord of remains within theoverburden of a site.Establishes the nature and extentof landforms and the associationsthey may have with particulartypes of archaeological remains.Rapid coverage over large areasnoting the potential presence ofburied archaeological remains.Rapid assessment of theexistence of buried sites,buried land surfaces andorganic deposits that may holdpalaeoenvironmental information.As evaluation trenching but onsmaller scale. Can also link fieldwalkingdata with buried featuresand record archaeological remainssurviving in the overburden.Determination36 Following one or more stages of pre-determinationworks, an informed decision is made by the planningauthority to grant or refuse planning permission. Ifpermission is granted, appropriate planning conditionsor obligations, such as Section 106 agreements, will beapplied. Permission may be granted subject to a rangeof conditions. Examples could include further evaluationwork, full archaeological recording or, on some occasions,the preservation in situ of nationally important remainsidentified during the pre-determination evaluation stage.On occasions no further action may be required otherthan the analysis and dissemination of results to date (foran example of model conditions see PPG 16 paragraph30 (DoE 1990) and DoE Circular 11/95). It is a keyprinciple of PPG 16 that there should be a presumptionin favour of preservation in situ of nationally importantremains and their settings, whether scheduled or not.In addressing the latter consideration the developerand curator also need to give consideration to thecharacter of the surrounding historic landscape. In somecases preservation in situ may be beneficial for boththe protection of the archaeology and the developer,as the latter does not have to bear the cost of fullexcavation. Preservation in situ may be appropriatefor other remains that are considered to be ofsufficient importance.37 The criteria for assessing whether archaeologicalremains are of national importance are set out inAnnex 4 of PPG 16 (DoE 1990) together with anadditional criterion identified by English Heritage as‘amenity value’.The amenity value of a monument isassessed in terms of its visibility and its physical andintellectual accessibility.These criteria are currently underreview and further guidance can be expected. Otherfactors that should be considered are the state ofpreservation of the archaeological remains and thepotential for survival beneath the surface. Becauseall sites are unique, weighing up the significance ofarchaeological remains requires professional judgement.Post-permission mitigation measures38 Official guidance states that planning conditions,including those for post-permission archaeologicalmeasures, should only be imposed where they satisfyall of the following tests. In brief, all archaeologicalconditions at any stage in the planning processshould be:Table 4: Contributions of the archaeological techniques typically used at thepre-determination stage to establish the importance of archaeological remains.14

KEY POST-DETERMINATIONTECHNIQUESArchaeologicalsurveyExcavationMonitoringPalaeoenvironmentalanalysisStrip, map andsampleWatching briefWHAT CAN IT DELIVER?This may take the form of atopographic survey of upstandingfeatures, a contour survey orrapid walkover survey to identifyany surviving features withsurface expression.Full recording and/or samplingof archaeological remainsover large or small areasbefore removal.This may include anarchaeologist visiting anextraction site on a regular basiswhen extraction is taking placeto monitor sediment or rocksections in order to identify andrecord archaeological featuresthat may be revealed.Reconstructs past human useof the environment through avariety of methods that includesampling organic sedimentsfor pollen, seeds, charred orwaterlogged wood, and indicatorspecies such as beetles, snailsor other organisms.Stripping the site to reveal theentire archaeological remainswithin a development area,planning them and thenselectively sampling to provideinformation sufficient tointerpret the site adequately.Ensures archaeologicalmonitoring (and recording ifnecessary) over a given area asit is stripped back under closearchaeological supervision.• necessary• relevant to planning• relevant to the development to be permitted• enforceable• precise• reasonable in all other respectsAny programme of post-permission archaeologicalworks should be discussed and agreed with thearchaeological curator in advance of commencement.Such a requirement usually appears as part of anarchaeological condition.39 Archaeological mitigation measures range from nofurther work, through full excavation to preservationin situ of archaeological remains.Typically they liesomewhere between two ends of the spectrum andinvolve a combination of preservation, excavation(ie recording) and perhaps long-term monitoring (seeTable 5). Because the choice of mitigation measuresrequires a long-term perspective, due considerationshould be given to ensuring that mitigation solutions aresustainable over the long term. In some cases this meansthat archaeological remains will be protected through‘preservation by design’. For example, if ground waterlevels need to be altered, this work will be designedin a way that prevents any waterlogged archaeologicalremains from drying out and thus being destroyed.Where remains are preserved in situ there may be aneed for long-term monitoring, and possible provision forfurther mitigation if preservation conditions deteriorate.40 A key part of post-permission mitigation is theassessment, analysis, archiving and dissemination ofinformation – sometimes referred to as the ‘postexcavationstage’ (Table 6). It is not only essential thatsuch work is factored into the cost of post-permissionmitigation but also that its level and scope is agreedwith the archaeological curator shortly after thefieldwork is complete. Later on there may be significantopportunities for developers to use interpretative,educational and outreach initiatives to engage withthe wider community and gain recognition for theirinvestment in the archaeological heritage.Table 5: Contributions of the archaeological techniques that are most typicallyused in the post-determination stage.15

TYPICAL POST-EXCAVATIONWORKPrimary archiveAssessmentAnalysisReport ProductionWHAT CAN IT DELIVER?This includes a stratigraphyreport detailing all archaeologicalfeatures and contexts andrelating them to theirstratigraphic sequence and anyrelationships between features aswell as illustrations, photographsof the small finds andenvironmental samples andtheir accompanying registers.After the primary or site archiveis compiled certain categoriesof material that may providefurther information are rapidlyassessed to see whether theymerit a full analysis. For example,common finds that are assessedare pottery, flint tools,metalwork, skeletal remains,environmental samples andmaterial that could beradiocarbon dated. Selectedsamples may be dated to providespot-dates on key deposits.If, after assessment, any materialis considered appropriate forfurther analysis then a morethoroughanalysis of the materialtakes place.This could include,for example, the acquisition ofradiocarbon dates, a report onthe pottery assemblage orreport on the environmentalremains from a site.Once the primary archive hasbeen assembled and anyassessments and analyses arecomplete a final integratedreport is produced that shouldsynthesise and interpret thearchaeological remains.ArchiveDisseminationThis includes the archiving andmounting of photographs andtransparencies, the conservationand appropriate storage of smallfinds and the paper site archive.These should then be depositedwith an appropriate institution.The digital archive is normallysubmitted to the on-linedatabase of archaeological sites(OASIS).This may take a range of formsfrom a published academic paperor monograph to newspaperand magazine articles, publictalks, television and radioprogrammes, other mediacoverage, information panels,open days, school visits orschool packs, leaflets, guidedwalks and so forth.Table 6: Contributions of the key components of the post-excavation, archiveand dissemination phase.41 Restoration is a key element of mineral extractionand one that has been carried out to good effect onmany sites, thereby improving the landscape and thequality of life of local communities. It is important thatplans for quarry restoration are in keeping with thehistoric landscape character of the site’s surroundings.In practice this has to be reconciled with a widerrange of interests that may also include biodiversity,geodiversity and recreation.16

TECHNIQUES42 The range of archaeological techniques describedbelow is not exhaustive, but simply provides an overviewof the more-commonly employed methods. Forconvenience they are described in alphabetical orderrather than in the sequence in which they will typicallybe employed in the planning process.The effectivenessof different archaeological techniques depends on thetype of landform on which they are being used, the typeand period of archaeology they are trying to locate orrecord, and in some cases even the time of year they areused. No single technique can provide all the informationand it is therefore in the interests of both the developerand the local authority archaeological curator to agree asuite of techniques suited to the particular needs of thesite under investigation.43 The post-excavation stage of any programme ofwork is an important consideration and should includeprovision for the assessment, analysis, archiving anddissemination of the results including, where possible,to the general public.The contribution by the developershould be accorded due recognition whereverappropriate. A section on the post-excavation phaseis included below.44 When employing any archaeological technique,appropriate technical standards and guidance mustbe followed, including those set out by the Institute ofField Archaeologists (IFA) and English Heritage as wellas other guidance specific to the region or technique.45 In the following overviews reference is made tothe relative costs of each technique.These commentsare intended only as a guide to help provide a broadindication of the cost of the various techniques relativeto each other. It must be borne in mind, however,that this will always be proportionate to the scaleand complexity of the site in question. In terms of riskmanagement more expensive techniques that providegood quality information can sometimes be more costeffective in the long run than cheaper but less reliableones that introduce a higher element of risk.Aerial photography46 Over the past hundred years, aerial photographyhas proved to be a very effective tool for discoveringarchaeological sites, although its effectiveness dependson the local geology, soil and land-use regime. Largecollections of aerial photographs, taken both forarchaeological and non-archaeological purposes,are available for study and provide a rich source ofvaluable information.17 Cropmarks of ring ditchesbelonging to previously upstandingBronze Age barrows in a fieldadjacent to flooded gravel pits nearWest Deeping, Cambridgeshire.© English Heritage.NMR17181918 A LiDAR image showing partof a Romano-British field system(right) near Halecombe Quarry,Somerset. Cambridge UniversityUnit for Landscape Modelling.© English Heritage19 Surveying of the principalcrushing mill at Hilton and Murtonlead mines, Scordale, Cumbria.© English Heritage17

47 Aerial photography can reveal archaeological sitesthat survive as upstanding remains or earthworks,including those that are slight and difficult to observe atground level. Sites no longer visible at the surface may beidentified, under certain conditions, through differences inthe growth of plants and crops.These crop marks andparch marks are usually only recognised from the air andare particularly common in drought conditions. Sites canalso be recognised through soil marks, when ploughingbrings parts of archaeological deposits to the surfaceof the field.48 Analysis of aerial photographs from all readily availablecollections should be a normal part of any desk-basedassessment.The work should be undertaken by aspecialist archaeological air photo interpreter who will beable to provide accurate mapping and guidance on thetypes of features visible and the limitations of the results.The collections of aerial photographs held by theNational Monuments Record (Swindon) and the Unitfor Landscape Modelling (Cambridge University) shouldalways be consulted, as well as those available throughthe local planning authority.The results should becompared with available geomorphological data toidentify whether apparently blank areas may be dueto archaeological remains being more deeply buriedand so less likely to be visible.49 English Heritage is undertaking a National MappingProgramme (NMP) to provide a synthetic analysis ofarchaeological features recorded from the air. The resultsfrom this can inform the Local Development Frameworkor be used in the pre-determination phase of theplanning application. In the areas already completedthis can provide a useful guide for planning purposes.Nevetheless it is still necessary to check whether newair photo information is available and whether moredetailedwork is needed for mitigation purposes. Severalaggregate resource assessment surveys have also usedthe NMP methodology to help strategic planning andenhance the respective HERs.50 Aerial photography can only partially reveal theextent and character of archaeological remains. Newtechniques such as airborne laser scanning (LiDAR) andmulti-spectral imaging can be useful additional tools.Like geophysical survey, however, they should betreated as complementary techniques rather thanbe used in isolation.51 Aerial photography is a mid-range expense, buthighly cost-effective in terms of the return that can beexpected from analysis and transcription. For potentiallarge-scale, long-term developments considerationshould be given to commissioning archaeological flyingat specific times of the year when the soil moisturedeficit is at its maximum.Archaeological survey52 Traditional archaeological survey is a non-intrusivemethod for recording upstanding archaeological remains.It is particularly useful for understanding constructionalrelationships and is used on earthwork sites and thosewith standing buildings or masonry. Surveys can take avariety of forms: the recording of upstanding features,landscape topography and contour surveys. If upstandingremains are to be excavated it is standard practice toaccurately survey the site in advance of excavation. Inaddition, if landscape character or the setting of a sitemay be disturbed by a development, then a survey ofthe surrounding area may be required.53 Surveys can often be enhanced by reference toaerial photographs that help show large features moreclearly, as well as the presence of buried features. Fieldsurveys may also be enhanced by the use of LiDAR data;depending on its resolution, this can very rapidly providedetailed contour information that can assist in pickingout subtle as well as more-clearly defined features. Itcan be particularly useful in relation to the rapid surveyof complex earthworks such as ridge and furrowploughing, deserted medieval villages, areas of woodlandand features associated with previous mineral extractionor 20th-century military installations.54 Walkover survey is a rapid means of assessing theupstanding archaeology and built structures of largeor inaccessible areas, such as woodland. It comprisessystematically walking over a given area in order to plotall features onto a base map, usually with the aid of ahand-held global positioning system (GPS).55 Survey is a recording technique that can be employedeither pre or post-determination. It is a medium-expensetechnique that requires time in the field by a teamof usually two or more people depending on the sizeof the site. It can involve the use of specialist surveyequipment, GPS instruments, surveying software anddrawing packages to produce scale drawings fromdigital output.18

Desk-based assessment56 A desk-based assessment (DBA) is defined bythe Institute of Field Archaeologists (IFA 2001b) as‘a programme of assessment of the known or potentialarchaeological resource within a specified area or site’.This involves a detailed and comprehensive assessmentof all the documentary evidence that can be accessedfor the development site and its immediate environs.Its purpose is to allow a well-informed judgment tobe made about the archaeological potential of thesite and the importance of any known remains.57 A DBA is frequently submitted to the planningauthority by the applicant in order to assist indetermining the need for further archaeologicalinvestigation. Archaeological curators should be consultedat the outset as to what is required in the DBA andwill advise on the specification for the work.Thearchaeological importance of a site is assessed againstother comparable examples and is guided principallyby the criteria set out in PPG 16.58 A DBA is used to ‘identify the likely character,extent, quality and worth of the known or potentialarchaeological resource’ (IFA 2001b). In doing this, theDBA will need to provide a statement of archaeologicalpotential, which if necessary can be tested and refined byfurther assessment.The DBA will typically include andanalyse information from a range of sources, including inthe first instance the HER, together with modern andhistorical maps and plans of the area, the NationalMonuments Record (NMR), Historic LandscapeCharacterisation (HLC) data, aerial photograph evidence,published literature and unpublished reports, geologicalinformation, place-name evidence and any literaturerelating to previous investigations on or near the site.59 Historic Landscape Characterisation (HLC) is atechnique for mapping and classifying the historiccharacter of the landscape. Around 89 per cent ofEngland’s countryside has been characterised at a macrolevel by an English Heritage supported programme,although HLC may also be undertaken at a detailed levelin order to address the specific requirements of theplanning process. It makes use of the sources typicallyconsulted in DBAs, but adds an historical interpretationof past and present landscape patterns. HLC isexpressed via digital mapping as part of a GIS, normallysupported by associated texts and databases. As well asdocumenting what has already been identified HLC canallow the prediction of hitherto unrecorded componentsof the historic landscape, including above-ground andburied archaeological remains.60 Desk-based assessments are relatively inexpensiveas they do not include any fieldwork other than amandatory site visit and walkover survey (see IFA2001b).They are undertaken during the predeterminationphase of the planning application.Because their information is crucial to the decisionmakingprocess the commissioning of a good DBAwill invariably be a sound investment.Evaluation trenching61 Evaluation is a ‘limited programme of non-intrusiveor intrusive fieldwork which determines the presence orabsence of archaeological features, structures, deposits,artefacts or ecofacts within a specified area or site’(IFA 2001d). It involves machine-stripping the overburdenfrom trenches spaced across the development areaor in targeted areas to define the nature, extent andimportance of any archaeological remains. Evaluationtrenching must comply with the IFA’s Standard andGuidance for Archaeological Field Evaluation (2001d).62 Each site should be considered on its specific meritsand the design of trenching should follow a question-ledapproach that draws on expectations of the type ofarchaeology that may reasonably be encountered andof its likely location.The planning authority may requesta sample of the site’s area and the importance of thearchaeological remains within in, to be evaluated.Thesample size should be reasonable and appropriate (seeCBI 1991 and commentary in Hey and Lacey 2001).This is because the purpose of evaluation trenching isto identify the potential of an area and the importanceof the archaeological remains within it, and not to sampleexcavate the site. Responsibility for ensuring appropriatelevels of evaluation trenching should be shared betweencurators, developers, consultants and contractors. Beforeplanning permission is granted the mineral planningauthority should be able to demonstrate that allreasonable steps have been taken to ascertain that noremains worthy of in situ preservation will be, or arelikely to be, disturbed by the proposed development.19

20 The study of previousarchaeological work and theexamination of old maps areclassic components of a desk-basedassessment. © ArchaeologicalResearch Services Ltd21 Information can also beacquired from examination ofhistoric drawings such as this1827 example showing granite202122quarrying at Haytor, Devon.Devon Library Service (WestcountryStudies Library)22 These evaluation trenches atBroadoak Quarry, near Ebchester,County Durham, were positionedfollowing a programme of intensivefieldwalking across the site.© Archaeological ResearchServices Ltd63 Although evaluation trenching has become a verycommon technique it can be more effective at findingcertain types of archaeological remains than others.Depending on the results of an evaluation, thearchaeological curator may decide that furtherinvestigation is necessary.Trenching will frequently bepositioned to investigate known or potential remainsidentified using other evaluation techniques.Trenching isparticularly effective at finding large structures, or linearfeatures such as ditches, pit alignments, enclosed sites,field systems and Roman roads. It can also result in thediscovery of smaller and more discrete features such aspit clusters, small post-built buildings and burials. If theselatter types of archaeological remains are expected thenother techniques should also be considered. Alternativelythey could be dealt with through post-permissionconditions. Interpreting the results from evaluationtrenching is of key importance. An arc of three smallpost-holes in a trench may, for example, indicate thepresence of a substantial settlement. It is typical forevaluation programmes to include a contingencyrequirement for additional or extended trenching toprovide a better understanding of any remains that areidentified. Combined with other evaluation techniquesevaluation trenching can offer an accurate, speedy andcost-effective means of finding remains that meritpreservation in situ and identifying other necessarymitigation measures.64 Trenching is a medium to high expense technique thatcan be very effective for locating and evaluating largesites, linear features or sites where certain typesof buried archaeological remains are anticipated.It requires a combination of mechanical excavationand limited archaeological investigation followed byassessment of any archaeological and environmentalremains that are revealed. It is used as part of thepre-determination phase of the planning application.20

Excavation65 An excavation is defined by the IFA as ‘a programmeof controlled, intrusive fieldwork with defined researchobjectives which examines, records and interpretsarchaeological deposits, features and structures and,as appropriate, retrieves artefacts, ecofacts and otherremains within a specified area or site (IFA 2001c).All excavation must comply with the IFA’s Standardand Guidance for Archaeological Excavation (2001c).66 Full archaeological excavation of a site allows forpreservation by record. Although physically destructive,excavation is almost invariably the most informative fieldtechnique and is imperative when archaeological remainswould otherwise be destroyed. As well as allowing asite to be recorded and understood in its entirety,excavation tends to the most effective technique forgenerating positive publicity and public interest in a site.67 The excavation process follows a typical sequence:• Once the overburden has been stripped, all featuresare hand-cleaned and surveyed.This can includeextant features such as pits, post-holes, hearths andditches, or spreads of artefacts within sedimenthorizons, such as scatters of stone tools, animal bonesor even log boats.• Each archaeological deposit and feature is usually fullyexcavated or sampled, drawn, levelled, photographedand surveyed.The fill of a feature is often sampled torecover smaller artefacts as well as botanical remainssuch as charred plant remains (for guidelines seeEnglish Heritage 2002). A record sheet for eachfeature and deposit is completed together withregisters of finds, samples, photographs and drawings.• Once excavation is complete the primary or sitearchive is moved to the office and any fragile findsare placed in a stable environment. Finds, samples,photographs, written and drawn records are thencollated ready for the Post-excavation stage (seesection below).68 Large scale excavation work should follow establishedpractice through the use of English Heritage’s MoRPHE(Management of Research Projects in the HistoricEnvironment, English Heritage 2006, the recentreplacement for MAP2) process and the IFA Standardand Guidance for Archaeological Excavation (2001c).23 A large multi-phase Iron Ageroundhouse under excavation atHoveringham Quarry, Gonaldston,Nottinghamshire. © L Elliot24 Fieldwalking at Lanton Quarry,Northumberland, revealed adiscrete focus of Neolithicoccupation on part of the site.© Archaeological ResearchServices Ltd23242525 Map showing the distributionof archaeological remainsin relation to differentgeomorphological units atthe Lanton Quarry site,Northumberland. © ArchaeologicalResearch Services Ltd21

69 Excavation is usually employed as part of the postdeterminationphase of the planning process. Because itis labour-intensive and generates more post-fieldworkanalysis than other techniques, excavation tends tobe the most expensive type of archaeological work.Once the site has been stripped and the full extent ofarchaeological features has been established excavationcosts and time frames can normally be fixed so as tolimit further financial risk to the developer.Fieldwalking70 This is an important technique that should beconsidered for all potential quarry sites where removalof topsoil will occur.This is because fieldwalking allowstwo processes to be undertaken at the same time. Firstly,by collecting a sample of the surviving artefacts from thetopsoil a record is created of the archaeological resourcein the topsoil. For some periods such as the Late UpperPalaeolithic, Mesolithic, Neolithic and Early Bronze Agethis may be all that is left of past human activity at thesite. Secondly, spatial plotting of artefacts found on thesurface can allow the location of potential sub-surfaceremains. Although this method is relatively inexpensiveit can yield good informative data. For best results itis sometimes worth having an area of land speciallyploughed or harrowed, provided it has been ploughedin the past and there is no risk to upstanding or buriedarchaeological remains. Fieldwalking usually needs tobe supported by other more invasive techniques,such as test pitting or evaluation trenching, in order tofurther define and characterise any surviving sub-surfacedeposits and the evidence for archaeological remainsin the overburden.71 Fieldwalking involves archaeologists systematicallywalking across ploughed fields searching the ground forartefacts.The closer together the walkers are placed themore accurate the survey will be and the greater thepotential to identify sites and assess potential risk. Innorthern England intervals of 2–5 metres have beenfound to be most effective whereas in other areas,where flint is more common, spacings of perhaps 10mmay be more appropriate. Finds are bagged, numberedand plotted in so that each find can be accuratelylocated on a map.72 The most common finds are stone tools and pottery.Fieldwalking is therefore particularly useful for identifyingStone Age (Palaeolithic, Mesolithic, Neolithic) and Earlyto Middle Bronze Age sites, as well as Iron Age, Roman,medieval and post-medieval sites that sometimesproduce large quantities of well-fired pottery. Poorly firedprehistoric and early medieval pottery is rarely foundusing this technique.Where sites are identified by aerialphotography or geophysics, fieldwalking can be used toassess their date as well as to retrieve importantartefactual evidence that may not survive in the burieddeposits. It is sometimes worth considering including aformal programme of metal detecting (for standards onmetal detecting see Gurney 2003) across a field if it isconsidered there is potential for metalwork to survive.73 Fieldwalking is a relatively inexpensive technique thatallows for broad-brush archaeological prospection andcharacterisation of Stone Age and later land use overlarge areas based on the patterning of stone tooldistributions. However, if significant quantities of finds areretrieved there may be additional costs for specialistanalysis of lithics (stone tools), ceramics and, more rarely,metalwork and coarse stone tools. Fieldwalking is mostcommonly employed in the pre-determination phaseof the planning application but the results from earliersurveys can usefully feed into the LDD. It is particularlyeffective for locating Stone Age archaeology whenundertaken at closely spaced intervals.Geomorphological mapping74 Geomorphological mapping can assist in thedesign of an evaluation programme. Detailed maps oflandform units can be used to identify potentialpalaeoenvironmental remains, assess sediment units, aswell as to produce superficial and buried-terrain modelsthat can inform predictive models of sites and theirwider landscape setting. Such work can reveal how thelandscape was formed and how it has been modifiedthrough time.This in turn allows prediction of thesurvival of remains of different periods at differentdepths, alongside an assessment of their likely stateof preservation and the type of techniques appropriatefor their evaluation.75 Geomorphological mapping usually requires aprogramme of fieldwork and survey by appropriatespecialists, supported by desk-based analysis of OrdnanceSurvey maps, geological maps, aerial photographs anddata from remote-sensing techniques such as LiDAR.Mineral operators frequently conduct their owngeotechnical bore-hole testing and where possiblethis should be used to assist and complement thegeomorphological analysis for archaeological purposes.Geomorphological maps can be used as the basisfor landform classification and these can informarchaeological expectations for an area and subsequentdecision-making.22

76 A typical application of geomorphological mappingmight involve augering across the development area tomap the depth and extent of a buried land surface or toidentify waterlogged sediment traps and other organichorizons.The technique can also be used to determinethe location and depth of hillwash deposits and thenfollow up such identifications with evaluation trenchingto assess their archaeological potential.77 Field-based geomorphological mapping is a rapid,cost-effective and relatively inexpensive means ofanalysing environmental change and landform evolution,as well as providing a platform for other evaluationwork.To maximise cost effectiveness, industry-requiredgeotechnical assessments and archaeologicalgeomorphological mapping should ideally be integrated.Together they can provide important information onpast landscape development and land-use by humanpopulations as well as generate data on earlier farmingpractices. Detailed mapping of extensive areas can begreatly facilitated by high-resolution remote sensingtechniques such as LiDAR, although these may add tothe cost of survey. Geomorphological mapping is typicallyemployed as part of the pre-determination phase of theplanning application although prior work can provideimportant information to the LDD.Geophysical survey and remote sensing78 Geophysical survey consists of a suite of non-invasiveground-based remote-sensing techniques that can aidthe discovery of buried archaeological remains bymeasuring different physical properties of the subsurface.The preferred methods for mapping shallow remainsare magnetometer and earth resistance survey, althoughground-penetrating radar (GPR) is sometimes used.English Heritage has prepared detailed guidance forthe deployment of these techniques (English Heritage,2008b).The archaeological curator and consultants willusually be able to use their local knowledge to commenton the likely effectiveness of the techniques in a givenarea and thus on whether or not they should beemployed.There may also be opportunities forintegrating archaeological prospection with broaderminerals-based geophysical survey.79 Geophysical survey can offer a relatively inexpensiveand cost-effective means of testing large areas for thepresence of sub-surface remains. However, its ability tosuccessfully detect archaeological deposits is influencedby local site conditions such as geology, soil properties,the depth of the overburden and variations in soilmoisturecontent. Because geophysical techniquesdepend on a physical contrast between buriedarchaeological features and the surrounding medium,it is not always possible to detect features with fills similarto their host soils and geology. Modern disturbancefrom pipes and other services can also mask moresubtle responses to archaeological features. Even whencircumstances are favourable, small discrete featuressuch as post-holes may not be identified, althoughsurveying with higher than normal sample densitiescan increase the chances of detection. Alluvial andother types of superficial deposits, particularly at depthsin excess of a metre, present serious difficulties forgeophysical prospecting.80 Because the responsiveness of geophysical techniquesis conditioned by local ground conditions, a pilot surveylinked with coring or test pitting can help with thedevelopment of a reliable and efficient evaluationstrategy. Different geophysical methods are oftencomplementary in the information they provide aboutburied remains. Because of its speed, magnetometersurvey will often be the preferred initial technique,followed up by more closely targeted investigationsusing other methods. Geophysical survey is typicallya medium-expense technique; it is not labour intensivebut does require the use of specialist personnel andequipment. It is typically employed as part of the predeterminationphase of the planning application.81 In recent years an airborne remote sensing techniqueknown as LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) hasbeen used to create highly detailed models of the landsurface at sub-metre resolution. As the LiDAR surveyaircraft flies over the target area a pulsed laser beam isscanned from side to side, measuring between 20,000to 100,000 points per second to build an accurate,high resolution model of the ground and the featuresupon it.This information can assist aerial photographicinterpretation of upstanding archaeological features aswell as slight natural features such as palaeochannels.In England the Environment Agency has for severalyears used LiDAR for the production of terrain mapsfor assessing flood risk.They hold data for large areasof the country, concentrating on the coasts and rivervalleys, and this can be made available in .jpg formatto legitimate researchers subject to strict licensingagreements.23

26 Magnetometer survey for Trent& Peak Archaeology showing thearc of a Romano-British enclosurewith overlying ridge-and-furrowcultivation at Captain’s Pingle,Barrow upon Trent, Derbyshire.© University of LeicesterArchaeological Services andLafarge Aggregates Ltd27 Environmental sampling of analluvial sediment unit near Cheviot262728Quarry, Northumberland.© Archaeological ResearchServices Ltd28 Microscopes are used toidentify ancient botanicalremains identified after theexpertly prepared samplehas been mounted on a slide.© Archaeological ResearchServices LtdPalaeoenvironmental analysis82 Palaeoenvironmental remains are those that shedlight on past landscapes and how they have beenimpacted upon by human activity.They may includeorganic evidence. At the pre-determination stage thisanalysis, where it is deemed appropriate, should belimited to assessment of whether or not deposits ofhigh palaeoenvironmental value are likely to be removedduring minerals extraction.83 If it is known that development will removedeposits of high palaeoenvironmental potential, planningconditions or obligations will require the analysis of thosesediments.To ensure the most cost-effective informationgain, sampling strategies for palaeoenvironmental analysisshould be implemented by specialists in this field workingclosely with the mineral operator.84 Finer-grained sediments accumulating in natural fluvialdeposits, ox-bow lakes and peat bogs can trap andpreserve pollen grains, fragments of plants and insects aswell as large pieces of wood and even contemporarytimber structures.These fossil remains can be extractedfrom sediments and analysed in the laboratory togetherwith material from archaeological deposits such asland snails, faunal remains and other organic material.Combined with radiocarbon dates from their associatedsediments (or the fossils themselves) these records helpto build a picture of the plant and insect communitiesof past landscapes as well as the human use andexploitation of organic materials.This information allowsarchaeologists to build up a detailed picture of howlandscapes looked and how they were used by earlierhuman populations. Often, this kind of contextualinformation cannot be acquired through archaeologicalexcavation alone. Palaeoenvironmental informationalso can sometimes be acquired from the fills ofarchaeological features, particularly when these containwaterlogged or charred remains or where thesurrounding geology is sufficiently alkaline to preserveunburnt organic material.85 The palaeoenvironmental record may yield evidencefor human activity such as deforestation, woodlandmanagement, pastoralism, cereal cultivation, miningand even climate change. It therefore constitutesan important part of the archaeological record.Furthermore, in areas where the latter is disturbedor absent, palaeoecological techniques offer the onlymeans of evaluating the presence and activities of pasthuman groups.24

86 Palaeoenvironmental analysis is a medium-costtechnique, depending on the scale of the work, thatrequires the use of specialist facilities and staff.Palaeoenvironmental analysis can often provideinformation about the past at a different geographicscale to that usually acquired from archaeologicalexcavation. It can also be used to assess theenvironmental impact and sustainability of pasthuman activities.Post-excavation, archive and dissemination87 Once archaeological fieldwork of any sort hastaken place there follows a post-fieldwork phaseduring which remains are processed and analysed anda report produced.The shorthand term for this phaseis ‘post-excavation’.88 Post-excavation work follows an established routineand set of standards which have been set out inMORPHE (English Heritage 2006), the IFA’s variousstandard and guidance documents (IFA 2001a–e)and those published as English Heritage’s ‘Centre forArchaeology Guidelines’ (English Heritage 2001a–b;2002 a–b, 2003, 2004, 2008b).89 During the post-excavation phase the remainsrecovered from excavation are assessed to identifywhether the material is worth further analysis in termsof the information it could yield.The most frequentanalyses are those of stratigraphic association, small finds(eg stone tools, ceramics, metalwork, bone objects,leather, textiles and glass), human skeletal remains,botanical and environmental remains (eg plants, wood,seeds, beetles, invertebrates, pollen), faunal remains (eganimal bones), scientific dating (eg radiocarbon dating,thermoluminescence and dendrochronology) andresidue analysis (eg from residues surviving on potsurfaces) but this list is by no means exhaustive.If remains need to be specially conserved then thisis carried out on the basis of expert advice, soughtin the first instance from the English Heritage RegionalScientific Advisor.90 Once the results of analysis are available a synthesisdraws together all the archaeological work and interpretsit. Depending on the quantity and significance of theresults an appropriate level of publication will berequired.This could range from a note in a localarchaeological journal through to an academicallyrefereed paper or standalone monograph. However,dissemination does not need to be confined topublication. It can also provide mineral developers witha huge range of opportunities to engage with thepublic and to gain recognition for their investment inarchaeological work. Other forms of dissemination caninclude open days, site tours, opportunities to take partin archaeological fieldwork, public lectures, walks, schoolactivities, information panels, reconstructions, leaflets,TV,radio and other media coverage.91 The permanent record of archaeological workincludes the primary or site archive (field notes, registers,drawings and recording sheets), the digital archive (alldigital files associated with the work) and the physicalarchive (finds, samples, photographs etc).The primaryand physical archive is deposited in an appropriatemuseum together with a copy of the digital archive ondisc. A copy of the digital archive may also be depositedwith the Archaeological Data Service (ADS) who willcurate the files in future years to ensure they remaincompatible with upgrades in software technology. Mostlocal authorities also require a copy of the final reportto be uploaded on to the Online Access to the Indexof Archaeological Investigations (OASIS) web site(maintained by the ADS) where a project summaryand copy of the report is available for public viewingvia the internet.THE TYPICAL PHASES OF POST-EXCAVATION WORKProcessing,checking,conservationStratigraphyreport andillustrationAssessmentPostexcavationproject designArchivePublicationanddisseminationFinal reportAnalysis25

29 Coring for organic sediments ina filled-in kettle hole close to anaggregate quarry at Wooperton,Northumberland. © ArchaeologicalResearch Services Ltd30 A mechanically stripped surfacebeing cleaned at Barrow uponTrent, Derbyshire. © Trent & PeakArchaeology29303131 Test-pitting on a sand and gravelterrace where large quantities ofMesolithic flint tools had previouslybeen discovered. © ArchaeologicalResearch Services Ltd92 Post-excavation work through to disseminationand archive can be a low, medium or high- expensedepending on the complexity and scale of the work.If additional work is carried out to produce widerpublic benefits, such as interpretive, educational andoutreach initiatives, the small extra cost involved isusually outweighed by significant gains for the mineraloperator and the public.Sediment analysis93 Analysis of the depth, nature and age of sedimentslying beneath the surface is an important means ofunderstanding land-forming processes and environmentalhistory. It should complement geomorphological mappingin palaeoenvironmental investigations. Sedimentarysequences may be well exposed in eroding river banks,aggregate quarries and drainage ditches. However, thesesections may only expose the upper part of sedimentbodies and in these cases, as well as in areas that lackany such exposure, it is usually necessary to extractsediment cores using hand-operated or powered augers.Mineral operators frequently commission geotechnicalboreholes of their own and these can provide veryuseful information for archaeologists. In some cases itmay be appropriate for a borehole to be monitoredby a geoarchaeological specialist who can identify anypotential archaeological or palaeoenvironmental materialrecovered from the borehole.94 Of particular interest to low-lying sand and gravelsites are palaeochannels that reflect changes in thecourse of past river channels.These former ox-bowlakes and floodplain wetlands are the most-likely areasfor deposition of peat and organic-rich sediments thatare suitable for radiocarbon dating and the preservationof pollen, plant and insect remains.These organicmaterials can reveal much about former environments,human land-use and change over time. It is not unusualfor palaeochannels to contain evidence that directlyrelates to human activity, such as fish weirs, flax retting,boats and so forth.95 Sediment coring and analysis is an inexpensive tomedium-expense technique which, in associationwith geomorphological mapping, provides the basisfor analysis of environmental change and a means ofaccessing material for radiocarbon and palaeoecologicalanalysis. It requires the use of specialist equipmentand staff and can be employed as part of the predeterminationphase of the planning application oras a post-permission measure.26

Strip, map and sample96 The ‘strip, map and sample’ method, sometimesreferred to as ‘strip and record’, is different to fullexcavation as it is primarily aimed at large open-areaexcavation where the intention is not to excavate all thearchaeological remains exposed, but rather to plan themin full and selectively sample them to answer specificquestions. It is important that the sampling strategyis rigorous and flexible and is kept under constantreview as recording progresses, for example to recordarchaeological remains in the overburden.This techniqueis particularly well suited to large rural sites but lessappropriate for small but complex sites, and particularlythose with deep stratigraphy.The technique involvesthe overburden being systematically stripped by machineto expose the top of the archaeological horizon.Archaeological remains within the stripped area are thencleaned, photographed and mapped. Following on fromthis a process of systematic excavation of deposits isundertaken, the intensity of which is usually decidedonce it has been established what archaeological remainsexist.The features or areas selected for excavation areusually sampled for artefacts and botanical remains.97 In certain circumstances this approach hasconsiderable appeal. Firstly, it allows for all archaeologicalremains to be recorded in plan.This allows for a muchfuller understanding of site layout and organisation andthe relationship between groups of features and theirwider setting, as well as the preservation by record of allremains that will eventually be removed. Secondly, theadoption of this approach may mean that less costlywork is required in the pre-determination stage as itsadoption as a post-determination measure should ensurethat all archaeological remains revealed on a site arerecorded in plan at that stage.Thirdly, resources can betargeted to maximise the information gain rather thanexcavation of all deposits.This also encourages aquestion-led, research-focused, approach, which helpsarchaeologists to think through what the site can tell us.98 Some of the most important gains in archaeologicalknowledge in recent years have occurred through theuse of the strip and record approach.These haveincluded the discovery of sites that are difficult toprospect for, such as Neolithic buildings, Bronze Ageroundhouses in lowland settings and Post-Roman postbuilthouses. Similarly, poorly surviving remains that aredifficult to recognise for example during evaluationtrenching, have come to light unexpectedly as a resultof this approach and these can add significantly to ourunderstanding of the past.32 A watching brief under way atCheviot Quarry, Northumberland.© Archaeological Research Services323333 Following the discovery of5th-century AD timber buildings atCheviot Quarry, Northumberland,this reconstruction was built at theneighbouring heritage trail, whereit can be visited by the public. ©Archaeological Research Services Ltd27

99 Strip, map and sample can be medium to highexpense but it can be more cost-effective and lessexpensive than full excavation.The drawback is thatthe costs are not known until the area has beenstripped, cleaned and mapped. However, as subsequentexcavation is targeted this does mean that resourcescan be allocated to best effect.The subsequent samplingstrategy that is adopted after a site is stripped shouldbe rigorous and flexible and kept under review so thatdeposits of a particular type or value can be dealtwith appropriately. For further information about thistechnique and its implications within the context of theplanning process see Hey and Lacey (2001).Test pits100 Test pits are different to evaluation trenches astest pits are usually hand dug and are much smaller.If test pits produce evidence for the survival ofarchaeological remains this can be very useful. Giventheir small size, however, a lack of positive results doesnot necessarily mean that there are no archaeologicalremains in the vicinity.101 Test pitting is often used in conjunction with otherforms of archaeological investigation to test for thepresence of buried remains. In areas where it is notpossible to fieldwalk – such as fields under permanentpasture or in areas of woodland – regularly spaced testpits allow the soil to be sampled for the presence orabsence of artefacts, while also allowing for theidentification of buried deposits.Test pits also provideinformation on the nature and depth of the overburdenand this can assist in deciding the most appropriatearchaeological evaluation techniques to employ on apotential development site.102 Test pits can vary in size from 1m and 2m squaresto 5m squares.They are often excavated in a gridpattern and the contents of each pit are usually sievedby spit to maximise the recovery of finds. Because oftheir small size test pits are not well suited to theevaluation of large areas. However, they provide asuitable means of supporting other techniques thattarget their location, such as fieldwalking, geophysicsand aerial photographic analysis.103 Test-pitting provides a way of sampling nonploughedareas, such as pasture or woodland as wellas testing data from fieldwalking, geophysical surveyand aerial photographic analysis for the presence ofsub-surface remains. It is generally an inexpensive tomedium-expense technique that demands a significantinvestment of labour depending on the size of the areabeing investigated and the sample interval required. Testpits also provide a section through sediments and thisadditional information can be helpful in understandingwhether or not remains will survive in the area, as wellas how the landform and soil cover has formed anddeveloped.They are typically employed as part of thepre-determination phase of the planning application.Watching brief104 A ‘watching brief’ – sometimes referred to as‘archaeological control and supervision’ or ‘recordingbrief’– is defined by the IFA as ‘a formal programmeof observation and investigation conducted during anyoperation carried out for non-archaeological reasons’(IFA 2001a). All watching briefs must comply with theIFA’s Standard and Guidance for an ArchaeologicalWatching Brief (2001a).105 Watching briefs are employed when otherevaluation techniques have not detected significantarchaeological or palaeoenvironmental remains but thereis still considered to be some potential for them tosurvive, or where the presence and nature of remainscould not be accurately established in advance ofdevelopment.106 A watching brief involves the presence ofarchaeologists and/or palaeoenvironmental specialistson site who supervise, observe and record any remainsexposed during groundworks. A planning authorityusually specifies a watching brief as part of a planningcondition in order to record any archaeological remainsunder a controlled programme of soil stripping.107 A watching brief can range from being aninexpensive to expensive technique. In straightforwardcases it requires few people to be on site, and if little isidentified the results will justify only a brief publishedreport. However, if archaeological remains are foundthen developers are usually expected to pay for fullexcavation and recording of the deposits, which couldnot only make this an expensive process but one thatdelays the development. Furthermore, a watching briefshould include stripping back of the overlying soils in acontrolled way that avoids machinery tracking overcleared areas; this may slow down the stripping of a siteand add to the cost of keeping plant on site. For thisreason archaeologists usually advise developers tobudget for a contingency sum and build additional timeinto the programme of works if a watching brief isemployed, in case archaeological or palaeoenvironmentalremains are found.28

REFERENCES AND KEY PUBLICATIONSACAO 1993. Model Briefs and Specifications forArchaeological Assessments and Field Evaluations.Bedford: ACAOAncient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979.London: HMSOBishop, M W 1998.‘Conserving the archaeological resourcein the Trent Valley’, in Jones, M and Rotherham, I D (eds)Landscapes – Perception, Recognition and Management:Reconciling the Impossible? Landscape Archaeology andEcology 3. Sheffield:The Landscape Conservation Forumand Sheffield Hallam UniversityBrickley, M and McKinley, J I 2004. Guidelines to theStandards for Recording Human Remains. IFA Paper No. 7.Southampton and Reading: British Association for BiologicalAnthropology and Osteoarchaeology and Institute ofField ArchaeologistsBrown, D H 2007. Archaeological Archives. A Guide to BestPractice in Creation, Compilation,Transfer and Curation.Reading: Institute of Field Archaeologists for theArchaeological Archives ForumBrunning, R 1996. Waterlogged Wood: Guidelines on theRecording, Sampling, Conservation and Curation of WaterloggedWood. London: English HeritageBMAPA and English Heritage 2003. Marine AggregateDredging and the Historic Environment: Assessing, Evaluating,Mitigating and Monitoring the Archaeological Effects of MarineAggregate Dredging. London: British Marine AggregatesProducers Association and English HeritageCanti, M 1996. Guidelines for Carrying out Assessments inGeoarchaeology. Ancient Monuments Laboratory Report34/96. London: English HeritageCBI 1991. Archaeological Investigations: Code of Practicefor Mineral Operators. London: Confederation ofBritish IndustryCorfield, M, Hinton, P, Nixon,T and Pollard, M (eds) 1996.Preserving Archaeological Remains in situ. Proceedings of theConference of 1–3 April 1996. London: Museum of LondonArchaeology ServiceDCLG 2006a. Minerals Policy Statement 1: Planning andMinerals. London: Department for Communities andLocal GovernmentDCLG 2006b. Planning and Minerals: Practice Guide. London:Department for Communities and Local GovernmentDETR 1999a. Circular 02/99: Environmental ImpactAssessment. London: Department for the Environment,Transport and RegionsDETR 1999b. Minerals Planning Guidance 3: Coal Miningand Colliery Spoil Disposal. London: Department for theEnvironment,Transport and RegionsDETR 1999c. Minerals Planning Guidance 7: Reclamationof Mineral Workings. London: Department for theEnvironment,Transport and RegionsDETR 1999d. Minerals Planning Guidance 10: Provision ofRaw Material for the Cement Industry. London: Departmentfor the Environment,Transport and RegionsDETR 1999e. Minerals Planning Guidance 13: Guidelines forPeat Provision in England. London: Department for theEnvironment,Transport and RegionsDETR 1999f. Town and Country Planning (EnvironmentalImpact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations.London: Department for the Environment,Transportand RegionsDoE 1995. Circular 11/95: Use of Conditions in PlanningPermission. London: Department of the EnvironmentDoE 1990. Planning Policy Guidance Note 16. London:Department of the EnvironmentEnglish Heritage 2001a. Archaeometallurgy. Centre forArchaeology Guidelines. London: English HeritageEnglish Heritage 2001b. Guidelines for the Care ofWaterlogged Archaeological Leather. Centre for ArchaeologyGuidelines. London: English HeritageEnglish Heritage 2001c. Managing Lithic Scatters:Archaeological Guidance for Planning Authorities andDevelopers. London: English HeritageEnglish Heritage 2002a. Environmental Archaeology. Centrefor Archaeology Guidelines. London: English HeritageEnglish Heritage 2002b. Human Bones from ArchaeologicalSites. Centre for Archaeology Guidelines. London:English Heritage29

English Heritage 2002c. English Heritage Strategy forWetlands. London: English HeritageEnglish Heritage 2003. Archaeological Science at PPG16Interventions: Best Practice Guidance for Curators andCommissioning Archaeologists. London: English HeritageEnglish Heritage 2004. Dendrochronology: Guidelines onProducing and Interpreting Dendrochronological Data.London: English HeritageEnglish Heritage 2006. Management of Research Projects inthe Historic Environment:The MoRPHE Project Managers’Guide. London: English HeritageEnglish Heritage 2008a. Mineral Extraction and the HistoricEnvironment. London: English HeritageEnglish Heritage 2008b. Geophysical Survey in ArchaeologicalField Evaluations (revised edn). London: English HeritageEnglish Heritage 2008c. Conservation Principles: Policies andGuidance for the Sustainable Management of the HistoricEnvironment. London: English. HeritageGaffney, C, Gater, J and Ovenden, S 2002. The Use ofGeophysical Techniques in Archaeological Evaluations. IFAPaper No. 6. Reading: Institute of Field ArchaeologistsGoodburn-Brown, D and UKICAS 2001. ExcavatedArtefacts and Conservation. Conservation Guidelines No. 1.London: United Kingdom Institute for ConservationArchaeology SectionGurney, D 2003. Standards for Field Archaeology in the Eastof England. East Anglian Archaeology Occasional Paper14. Gressenhall: Association of Local GovernmentArchaeology OfficersHey, G and Lacey, M 2001. Evaluation of ArchaeologicalDecision-making Processes and Sampling Strategies. Oxford:Oxford ArchaeologyIFA 2001a. Standard and Guidance for an ArchaeologicalWatching Brief. Reading: Institute of Field ArchaeologistsIFA 2001b. Standard and Guidance for Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment. Reading: Institute of Field ArchaeologistsIFA 2001c. Standard and Guidance for ArchaeologicalExcavation. Reading: Institute of Field ArchaeologistsIFA 2001d. Standard and Guidance for Archaeological FieldEvaluation. Reading: Institute of Field ArchaeologistsIFA 2001e. Standard and Guidance for the Collection,Documentation, Conservation and Research of ArchaeologicalMaterials. Reading: Institute of Field ArchaeologistsIFA 2007. Standard and Guidance for Stewardship of theHistoric Environment (interim version). Reading: Instituteof Field ArchaeologistsKnight, D and Howard, A J 2004. Trent Valley Landscapes.King’s Lynn: Heritage Marketing and PublicationsKnight, D and Vyner, B 2006 Making Archaeology Matter:Quarrying and Archaeology in the Trent Valley.YorkArchaeological Trust.ODPM 2004. Planning Policy Statement 12: LocalDevelopment Frameworks. London: Office of the DeputyPrime MinisterPassmore, D G,Waddington, C and Houghton, S J 2002.‘Geoarchaeology of the Milfield Basin, northern England;towards an integrated archaeological prospection, researchand management framework’. Archaeological Prospection 9,71–91Passmore, D and Waddington, C (forthcoming).Geoarchaeology and Landscape Management in the Till-TweedCatchment, North-East England. Oxford: Oxbow BooksWaddington, C and Passmore, D G 2006. Planning forthe Future: Historic Environment Planning Guidance for theTill-Tweed Valleys, Northumberland, UK. Morpeth:Northumberland County CouncilWalker, K 1990. Guidelines for the Preparation of ExcavationArchives for Long-Term Storage. London: United KingdomInstitute for Conservation Archaeology SectionWatkinson, D and Neal,V 1998. First Aid for Finds (3rd edn).Hertford: RESCUE and United Kingdom Institute forConservation Archaeology SectionGovernment publications listed under DETR, DoE and ODPM can all be obtained from thesuccessor department, Communities and Local Government (www.communities.gov.uk).The English Heritage publications listed here can be downloaded free of charge from www.helm.org.ukor www.english-heritage.org.uk. Most can also be obtained in printed form from English HeritageCustomer Services on 0870 333 1181 or by emailing customers@english-heritage.org.uk30

USEFUL SOURCES OF INFORMATIONAND ADVICEAggregates Levy Sustainability Fund (Informationabout a host of research projects that have generatedbetter understanding of sustainability within theminerals industry)www.sustainableaggregates.comAssociation of Local Government ArchaeologicalOfficers UK (ALGAO: UK)www.algao.org.ukBritish Aggregates Associationwww.british-aggregates.co.ukBritish Geological Survey:Centre for Sustainable Mineral Developmentwww.bgs.ac.uk/mineralsukEnglish Heritagewww.english-heritage.org.ukGoodquarry (Resource guide created by the MineralIndustry Research Organisation)www.goodquarry.comHELM (Historic Environment Local Managementinformation site maintained by EH)www.helm.org.ukHeritage Gateway (Information on archaeologicalsites and contact details for local HERs)www.heritagegateway.org.ukInstitute of Field Archaeologists (IFA)www.archaeologists.netMAGIC (Web-based map of environmental schemesand land designations in England)www.magic.gov.ukNational Mapping Programme (Information onEnglish Heritage’s national aerial photographic survey)www.english-heritage.org.uk/server/show/nav.1186National Monuments Record (English Heritage’spublic archive of 10 million archaeological andarchitectural records and photographs)www.english-heritage.org.uk/server/show/nav.1530OASIS (Index to archaeological literature resultingfrom developer-funded fieldworkhttp//ads.ahds.ac.uk/project/oasisPlanarch (Partnership promoting integration ofarchaeology within the planning process)www.planarch.orgQuarry Products Association (QPA)www.qpa.org.ukFor copies of this leaflet, or if you would like it in a different format, please contactour Customer Services department.Tel: 0870 333 1181; Fax: 01793 414926;Textphone: 01793 414878; Email: customers@english-heritage.org.ukwww.helm.org.ukUnless otherwise stated, all photographs are copyright of English Heritage.Published by English Heritage on behalf of the Minerals and HistoricEnvironment Forum, May 2008. Product Code 51415.www.english-heritage.org.uk51415(EVO5/08)VIT3000