Download pdf

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 100BMASSACHUSETTS BAR ASSOCIATION - PRO SE SURVEY - AUGUST 1999Page 20Why have you chosen to represent yourself in court today?By Type of LitigationPROBATE AND FAMILYHOUSINGTotal Guardian- Restrain. Modifi- Total Summary Restrain. Small SupplemntlTotal Probate Divorce Paternity ship of Mnr Order 209a Contempt cation Other Housing Process Civil Orders Claims Prceedings--------------- --------------- --------------- ------------- -------------- ------------- --------------- -------------- -------------- ------------ ------------ -------------- -------- -------- -----Couldn't find 19 8 1 1 1 1 3 1 4 3 1lawyer who 1.1% 0.7% 0.4% 0.7% 0.8% 2.0% 1.8% 0.7% 1.1% 1.4% 5.3%speaks my lang.Other 146 89 15 15 14 9 11 8 17 28 17 6 2 38.4°,{. 8.1% 5.5% 10.4% 10.9°,{. 18.4°,{. 6.5°,{. 4.2% 11.5°,{. 7.9% 8.1% 8.7°,{. 10.5% 6.8%No Response 145 13 5 2 2 2 5 3 2Note: Sum of responses may exceed 100 0 k due to multiple responses.Prepared by STS Market Research1218 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138
HeWhy have you chosen to represent yourself in court today?,IVIM....,A. 4A b c'19By Type of LitigationPROBATE AND FAMILYHOUSING---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.-------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total Guardian- Restrain. Modifi- Total Summary Restrain. Small SupplemntlTotal Probate Divorce Paternity ship of Mnr Order 209a Contempt cation Other Housing Process Civil Orders Claims Prceedings------------- --------------- ------------- ----------- -------------- ------------ -------------- ----------- --------------- --------------- ----------- -------------- ----------- --------------- --------------Total 1729 1101 272 144 128 49 170 190 148 354 211 69 19 44 11100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0 o k 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%Cannot afford the 853 590 132 80 53 19 118 125 63 117 61 30 10 11 5cost of a lawyer 49.3% 53.6% 48.5% 55.6% 41.4% 38.8% 69.4% 65.8% 42.6% 33.1% 28.9% 43.5% 52.6% 25.0% 45.5%Case is simple, 838 530 144 66 55 21 65 97 82 191 122 37 3 26 3don't need a 48.5% 48.1% 52.9% 45.8% 43.0% 42.9% 38.2% 51.1% 55.4% 54.0% 57.8% 53.6% 15.8% 59.1% 27.3%lawyerRepresented self 155 61 12 5 5 1 11 20 7 65 53 6 5 1before, & was 9.0% 5.5% 4.4% 3.5% 3.9% 2.0% 6.5% 10.5% 4.7% 18.4% 25.1% 8.7% 11.4% 9.1%plsd withoutcomeDon't have 120 77 16 11 10 6 15 12 7 14 4 2 4 3 1lawyer today, but 6.9% 7.0% 5.9% 7.6% 7.8% 12.2% 8.8% 6.3% 4.7% 4.0% 1.9% 2.9% 21.1% 6.8% 9.1%plan to retain oneEasier to control 117 46 10 3 7 2 4 12 8 46 38 2 1 3 2my case when I 6.8% 4.2% 3.7% 2.1% 5.5% 4.1% 2.4% 6.3% 5.4% 13.0% 18.0% 2.9% 5.3% 6.8% 18.2%represent myselfCan afford 111 46 15 6 5 2 5 6 7 42 34 4 1 3lawyer, but is 6.4% 4.2% 5.5% 4.2% 3.9% 4.1% 2.9% 3.2% 4.7% 11.9% 16.1% 5.8% 5.3% 6.8%more $ than Iwant to spendObtained legal 101 63 18 3 9 2 8 16 7 22 12 2 3 4 1forms/advice 5.8% 5.7% 6.6% 2.1% 7.0% 4.1% 4.7% 8.4% 4.7% 6.2% 5.7% 2.9% 15.8% 9.1% 9.1%from non-lawyersourceDon't trust 92 43 12 5 3 2 8 9 4 22 15 2 4 1lawyers 5.3% 3.9% 4.4% 3.5% 2.3% 4.1% 4.7% 4.7% 2.7% 6.2% 7.1% 2.9% 21.1% 2.3%Don't know how 74 45 6 5 14 3 7 5 5 14 6 2 3 1 2to obtain a lawyer 4.3% 4.1% 2.2% 3.5% 10.9% 6.1% 4.1% 2.6% 3.4% 4.0% 2.8% 2.9% 15.8% 2.3% 18.2%A lawyer declined 23 16 2 1 2 1 7 3 1 1to take my case 1.3% 1.5% 0.7% 0.7% 1.6% 2.0% 4.1% 2.0% 0.3% 0.5%Note: Sum of responses may exceed 100% due to multiple responses..Prepared by STS Market Research1218 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138
Page 1 and 2: Massachusetts Bar AssociationPro Se
Page 3 and 4: Objective and MethodologyObjective
Page 5 and 6: Massachusetts Pro Se Litigant Profi
Page 8 and 9: Level of Education• Eighty-five p
Page 10 and 11: Racial Distribution11 0 / 0• The
Page 12 and 13: '1~Primary Languages ofPro Se Litig
Page 14 and 15: Gender of Pro Se Litigants: by Prob
Page 16 and 17: Gender of Pro Se Litigants: by Hous
Page 18 and 19: Lawyers' Fees: by Probate and Famil
Page 20 and 21: Lawyers' Fees: by Housing Court Lit
Page 22: Reasons for Self-representation•
Page 25 and 26: TABLE 1500MASSACHUSETTS BAR ASSOCIA
Page 27 and 28: TABLE 1300)MASSACHUSETTS BAR ASSOCI
Page 29 and 30: TABLE 1100 MASSACHUSETIS BAR ASSOCI
Page 31 and 32: TABLE 900 MASSACHUSETTS BAR ASSOCIA
Page 33 and 34: t;., ...TABLE 700 MASSACHUSETTS BAR
Page 35 and 36: \ \TABLE 500 MASSACHUSETIS BA\SSOCI
Page 37 and 38: ~. -,- j ", J I.. ··TABLE 300 MAS
Page 39: Table lOOCPage 21Comparison of affo
Page 43: Table lOOAMASSACHUSETIS BAR ASSOCIA

Download pdf

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?