13.07.2015 Views

Summer 2006 - International Brotherhood of Teamsters

Summer 2006 - International Brotherhood of Teamsters

Summer 2006 - International Brotherhood of Teamsters

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

■ Sets standards for the infrastructure protection program,for a program to protect community facilities, and forcommunication between rail operators and state and locallaw enforcement and emergency <strong>of</strong>ficials.■ Provi des that the Dep a rtm ent <strong>of</strong> Tra n s port a ti on has aut h ority to fine any rail opera tor or any other pers on covered bythe act up to $50,000 per day for certain vi o l a ti on s . Pro h i bi t sp u n i tive acti on against any em p l oyee reporting a vi o l a ti on <strong>of</strong>the act , i n cluding em p l oyees <strong>of</strong> con tractors , su bcon tractorsand others performing work on rail fac i l i ti e s .This legislation would also require the railroads to describethe communication procedures with state and local <strong>of</strong>ficials,law enforcement <strong>of</strong>ficers, and emergency responders in theevent <strong>of</strong> an act <strong>of</strong> terrorism or other crime. Also, the railroadswould be required to train railroad crews as first responders.“Our members need to have training on whom to contactand what to do in case <strong>of</strong> a security threat,” said Bill Verdeyen,Chairman <strong>of</strong> the BLET’s Indiana State Legislative Board.“There was also language dealing with unattended locomotivesneeding to be locked, securing locomotives from unauthorizedentry, and background checks for contractors or subcontractors<strong>of</strong> the rail operator. This is a great bill that willproduce a safer work environment for our members.”Under intense lobbying from the rail corporations, however,many <strong>of</strong> the Community Rail Security bills have notpassed. Nevertheless, the BLET and BMWED legislative <strong>of</strong>ficialswill continue their efforts in the upcoming term.“Rail security along the nation’s 230,000miles <strong>of</strong> track is a perilous vulnerabilityin the security <strong>of</strong> our homeland.”–Jim H<strong>of</strong>fa, <strong>Teamsters</strong> General PresidentLack <strong>of</strong> Security Cited in HearingsDuring a recent hearing <strong>of</strong> the Transportation Committee inNebraska, Spence Morrissey, BMWED’s Nebraska StateLegislative Director, provided personal and member observationson lack <strong>of</strong> training and security in Burlington NorthernSanta Fe (BNSF) yards. He also provided observations aboutthe Union Pacific Bailey Yard during the same hearing. Thehearing was the result <strong>of</strong> the Local Community Rail SecurityAct introduced in the Nebraska legislature.He reported on several recent incidents that occurredthroughout his inspection territory. One incident occurred sixdays prior to the hearing and involved the derailment <strong>of</strong> twotrains containing hazardous materials (one with six cars <strong>of</strong>chlorine). The trains were unmanned and unsecured for 12hours in the neighborhoods <strong>of</strong> Lincoln, Nebraska.Morrissey reported that, in discussing the legislation withthe Senators after they killed the bill, they were consistent intheir response. They said that the railroads were doing everythingthat could and should be done and to expose their planswould be counterproductive. Three senators all said, “They aredoing it, you employees just don’t see it.”Passage <strong>of</strong> Rail Security Bills a PriorityMembers <strong>of</strong> the Rail Conference plan to aggressively pursuethe passage <strong>of</strong> the Community Rail Security bills in the comingyear. BMWED Illinois Assistant State Legislative DirectorJohnny Oeth III said there was value in pushing for the legislation.“What has come out <strong>of</strong> this bill is thatrail labor now has a voice in the security<strong>of</strong> the railroads,” Oeth said. “We sure gotthe attention <strong>of</strong> all the railroads.”<strong>Teamsters</strong>, Congress BlastBush on Rail SecurityThe Rail Conference and members <strong>of</strong> theU.S. House <strong>of</strong> Representatives expressedoutrage over the Department <strong>of</strong>Homeland Security’s announcement onMarch 31 that it was issuing voluntarysecurity guidelines, as opposed tomandatory regulations, for railroad companiesthat transport the most hazardouschemicals in the United States.“Rail security along the nation’s230,000 miles <strong>of</strong> track is a perilous vulnerabilityin the security <strong>of</strong> our homeland,”said Jim H<strong>of</strong>fa, <strong>Teamsters</strong> General President. “For theBush administration to allow their own department <strong>of</strong>Homeland Security to issue security guidelines which are onlyvoluntary is insensitive to both public and worker safety onthe rails.”While the sec u ri ty guidelines issu ed by the Bush ad m i n i s-tra ti on note that many hazardous materials carri ed by rail havethe po ten tial <strong>of</strong> causing significant nu m bers <strong>of</strong> f a t a l i ties andi n ju ries if i n ten ti on a lly rel e a s ed in an urban envi ron m en t , t h edoc u m ent also states that “All measu res are vo lu n t a ry.”Rep. Markey: Security Not an ‘April Fools’ JokeRep. E dw a rd Ma rkey (D-MA) is the aut h or <strong>of</strong> l egi s l a ti onthat would requ i re the Dep a rtm ent <strong>of</strong> Hom eland Sec u ri ty toi m pose ad d i ti onal sec u ri ty requ i rem ents for shipm ents <strong>of</strong>ex trem ely hazardous materi a l s , i n cluding re - ro uting <strong>of</strong> su chs h i pm ents around areas that raise particular sec u ri ty con cern swh en ever po s s i bl e . The legi s l a ti on was recen t ly adopted as ana m en d m ent to H.R. 4 4 3 9 , a bi ll to reor ga n i ze the Tra n s port a-ti on Sec u ri ty Ad m i n i s tra ti on , du ring a Hom eland Sec u ri tyAP/Wide WorldSu bcom m i t tee mark u p.“ Un fortu n a tely, this joke <strong>of</strong> a proposal has de adly seri o u scon s equ en ces for the sec u ri ty <strong>of</strong> toxic ch emicals tra n s portedac ross our nati on’s rail net work . The Bush ad m i n i s tra ti onm o t to con ti nues to be ‘ In In du s try We Tru s t ,’ and (the Ma rch31) noti ce is the latest example <strong>of</strong> the Bush ad m i n i s tra ti on lettingcompanies dec i de just what sec u ri ty prec a uti ons should bet a ken . This ad m i n i s tra ti on is doing nothing more than askingi n du s try to do us a favor and please pro tect the public—this isan abdicati on <strong>of</strong> its re s pon s i bi l i ty to the Am erican peop l e .”The RisksE ach day hu n d reds <strong>of</strong> thousands <strong>of</strong> s h i pm ents <strong>of</strong> ex trem ely hazardous materials travel thro u gh den s ely pop u l a ted areas and nearc ri tical infra s tru ctu re su ch as bri d ges and power plants. E n o u ghch l orine to kill 100,000 people in half an hour is ro uti n ely conta i n ed in a single rail tanker car that ro lls ri ght thro u gh crowdedu rban cen ters wi t h o ut adequ a te sec u ri ty pro tecti on .In 2003, an Ohio-based Al Qaeda operative was arrested forplotting to collapse a bridge in New York City or derail a trainAP/Wide World14 | Rail Teamster | <strong>Summer</strong> <strong>2006</strong> | www.teamster.orgwww.teamster.org | <strong>Summer</strong> <strong>2006</strong> | Rail Teamster | 15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!