13.07.2015 Views

ATTORNEY GENERAL for ONTARIO (Respondent) v. BEAR ...

ATTORNEY GENERAL for ONTARIO (Respondent) v. BEAR ...

ATTORNEY GENERAL for ONTARIO (Respondent) v. BEAR ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

disposed of this appeal, the matters raised have lost their significance. The cross-appeal will bedismissed without costs.There is outstanding an application to this court by the Attorney General <strong>for</strong> interim injunctive relief.With the release of this judgment the power of this court to grant interim relief pursuant to s-s.144(2) of the Courts of Justice Act, 1984, S.O. 1984, c.11 comes to an end and that applicationwill be dismissed without costs.At trial the Attorney General was awarded costs. The appeal having failed and there being noappeal against costs alone, nor leave sought pursuant to s-s.143(b) of the Courts of Justice Act,1984, the propriety of the order with respect to costs is there<strong>for</strong>e not an issue be<strong>for</strong>e this court.We add, however, that even if the question of the costs at trial were properly be<strong>for</strong>e this court, wefind no error in the disposition of this matter by the trial judge. With respect to this appeal,however, we think that the parties and interveners should bear their own costs.In the result, the appeal is dismissed without costs.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!