13.07.2015 Views

Parliament-Watch-Bulletin_Mid-Term-Audit-2014

Parliament-Watch-Bulletin_Mid-Term-Audit-2014

Parliament-Watch-Bulletin_Mid-Term-Audit-2014

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A <strong>Mid</strong> <strong>Term</strong> Citizens’ Assessment of the 9th <strong>Parliament</strong>Financial excess Control growing lavish andwasteful expenditure of statehouse and ministries. Regulate and monitor performanceon budget discipline of theexecutive and particularly oncontinued failure to live within theagreed budget allocations. Amend existing laws to check,strengthen and tighten financialleakages and excessesexecutiveof theFindings: The Finance Act 2006 (Amendment)Act, 2012, and the AppropriationsAct, 2013 passed Bills under consideration included theFinance Bill, 2013, and theSupplementary2013Appropriations bill, Several ministers and heads ofdepartments, institutions, and agencieswere summoned in order to accounti.e. officials from OPM, Ministersaccused of oil bribes, the GovernorBOU etc. <strong>Parliament</strong>ary Committee on Financeto oversee the performance of theMinistry of Finance, Planning andEconomic Development was set up. Public Accounts Committee continuedto play a visible role and looked intothe expenditures of different ministriesand public officialsMODERATE The new Finance Bill seems to Desist from makingundermines its integrity topay less attention to the role of the <strong>Parliament</strong> in public retrogressive approvals ofpublic expenditure decisions.financial management andparticipation of stakeholders in the budget process. Amend the law to make thespeaker of <strong>Parliament</strong> anindependent one who should The 9 th <strong>Parliament</strong> has failed to institute stiff penalties on the not be an elected MP ormember of any political party.accused corrupt officials; Amend Clause 21 (6) of the Cases of ministers claiming to Public Finance Bill, 2012 onhave stepped aside for supplementary budget to stateinvestigations have flopped as they still undertake their duties even when claiming to be off duty.that all supplementaryspending is approved by<strong>Parliament</strong>, and to remove theprovision for retrospective The state house expenditure hasapproval of supplementarycontinued to grow lavishly andspending.wastefully. Publicise budgetary processesand insist on transparency and <strong>Parliament</strong> has failed to spearheadpublic interest litigation budget process in order topublic participation in theagainst excesses of the executive maximizepeople-centrede.g. when government tookoutcomes.money from consolidated fund Institute and toughen onwithout approval of parliamentimplementation of penaltiesto pay donors for PRDP fundsfor financial mismanagementstolen by interdicted officials.by the executive and public The Executive has used the servantsNRM Party caucus to Repeal Article 156(2) of theundermine the parliamentary 1995 Uganda Constitutiondecisions regarding financial which provides retrospectiveappropriations and management approval of supplementaryand curbing the culprits of such expenditure as it facilitatescases.impunity and government Members of <strong>Parliament</strong> have excesses.also been accused of takingbribes which casts doubt on theindependence of <strong>Parliament</strong> and28UGMP September <strong>2014</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!