13.07.2015 Views

Respondent Supplemental Declaration and Response ... - Home Page

Respondent Supplemental Declaration and Response ... - Home Page

Respondent Supplemental Declaration and Response ... - Home Page

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728children <strong>and</strong> her attempt to alienate them from me. I refer the Court to my declarationfiled on July 9, 2009 in support of my ex parte request. Unfortunately, despite theappointment of minors' counsel, Lee Lawless, Ginny's interfering behavior hascontinued.I knew that when the Court made its orders on June 5 that I have primaryphysical custody of our daughters, Kira <strong>and</strong> Kessa, there would be a period of transitionfor all the children. Ginny has made it even more difficult for the children to adapt to thenew circumstances. Ginny does not support my relationship with the children. Sheeven told Ms. Lawless that she does not believe that I love the children. She sent Ms.Lawless an e-mail claiming that Kira believes I am poisoning her. This was Ginny'sexplanation for why Kira refused to take her iron supplements in my home. Ginny wenton to say that she was worried about Kira's safety with me, <strong>and</strong> accused me of trying topoison her with Malathion during our marriage. Originally, I was accused of not givingKira the supplement at all. Now I am being accused of trying to poison her. Ms.Lawless, however, informed Ginny in her e-mail response that Kira never said anythingto her about being afraid of taking the supplement. (Lodged Exhibit A — e-mailcorrespondence dated July 23, 2009 between Ginny <strong>and</strong> Lee Lawless)I agree with the opinions of Ms. Lawless contained in her report. I believe thecustody evaluation may give more guidance on how to address Ginny's interferingbehavior <strong>and</strong> the effect that it is having on my relationship with the children. Theevaluation may also address how this transition period is affecting the boys <strong>and</strong> myrelationship with them.I also agree that Ginny should not have midweek visitation with the girls at thispoint. The twice weekly contact will only be disruptive <strong>and</strong> will prevent the girls fromestablishing healthy routines in my household.School EnrollmentThe Petitioner's motion regarding school enrollment was served on my attorneyon August 26, 2009.RESPONDENT'S SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION AND RESPONSE TO OSC RE SCHOOL ENROLLMENT2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!