1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 FOR THE NORTHERN ...

1412345678910111213141516171819202122232425dismissed.Q. And was any consideration paid by TASER inconnection with that voluntary dismissal?A. Absolutely not.Q. Do you know whether consideration was paid tothose plaintiffs by the police agency that used theTASER?A. I'm not sure about that.Q. Do you know whether there was any I'd saypackage deal, where the police agency agreed to pay theplaintiffs in exchange for voluntary dismissal of theentire action, which would include TASER?A. No, I'm pretty sure there was not.In fact, as I think back about it, I believethe agency may have engaged in a settlement at a timeperiod that was significantly different than when thecase against us was dropped, so I don't think there wasany interaction whatsoever.Q. And I understand that just recently, Alvaradowas resolved with a defense verdict after a jury trial.Have there been any other TASER products liability casesinvolving an alleged death that have proceeded to trial,to jury trial?A. I don't believe so.Q. Now, I know the Powers case, which did not