Main Green Paper questions for discussion - ukipg

More documents

Recommendations

Info

• Would such an extension fall outside scope of Directive?• In medicine, one can already enter foundation year training from abroad; butthe Directive’s legal base currently only covers recognition of completedstudies.Discussion 3: Partial access and temporary mobilityQuestion 3: Do you agree that there would be important advantages to inserting theprinciple of partial access and specific criteria for its application into the Directive?(Please provide specific reasons for any derogation from the principle.)• (Health group 2): Partial access is in case law, needs some recognition andclear boundaries in the Directive• Safety an important consideration which needs defining• (environment and animal welfare group): partial access needs recognising,but in what situations? Specialist special needs teachers one example• Communication of what professional is restricted to a problem• Safety: public health risks need considering• (Other professions): partial access can benefit some professions, differentregulation / specialisations; partial recognition in the UK could work in someareas• (Health): better to have partial access in the Directive than case law; clearguidance needed on public safety; derogation for health professions might bea solution.• Specialists coming to the UK on the basis of partial access would lead toconfusion as to what they are able to practise• (Construction): partial access clearly has value, but circumstances need to beclarified. Specialism in one state coming to a state where broadly regulated –how to deal with this? Some Member States have created new professionaltitles specifically for this purpose (only for foreign nationals) – not desirable.• More detail as to how it could be applied, easier just to allow full access ornot allow itQuestion 7: Do you agree that the requirement of two years' professional experiencein the case of a professional coming from a non-regulating Member State should belifted in case of consumers crossing borders and not choosing a local professional inthe host Member State? Should the host Member State still be entitled to require aprior declaration in this case? (Please give specific arguments for or against thisapproach.)Question 8: Do you agree that the notion of "regulated education and training" couldencompass all training recognised by a Member State which is relevant to aprofession and not only the training which is explicitly geared towards a specificprofession? (Please give specific arguments for or against this approach.)
• (Health group 2): the requirement for 2 years’ experience is helpful to ensurepublic confidence, even if the experience was in another system• (environment and animal welfare group) There are issues with temporarymobility. 2 years’ experience does give some assurance, especially whereprofession is not regulated elsewhere.• (Professional services): Years of experience are not necessarily a goodmeasure of competence• Issues remain with movement between unregulated and regulated countries• (Other professions): 2 years’ experience: how is this measured? (e.g.seasonal) If you need certain (e.g. local) experience – how do you acquire• How do you reach the standard if it’s unclear what it means, there is no listdefining the standard in some countries.• (Health): Temporary mobility – lack of definition, clarity needed for otherterms in the current Directive too• (Construction): For some professions, it would be disproportionate to ask aprofessional to register if the consumer is satisfied?• Q8 –Opening up regulated education might open the floodgates in terms ofwhat professional provides, especially if it is clear across the EU what isrequired for a profession. It is Common to have varied qualifications for oneprofession(General discussion)• Professionals who accompany consumers might stay – existing provisionscover this already. It is also unclear what is meant by temporary andoccasional service provision.• Finding the Point of Single Contact (Services Directive) is a problem in manycountries! Such portals have to be user-friendly, or else legislation will beignored• A system which works effectively across the board would solve many of theseproblems• Temporary registration needs to be made accessible by the authorities; insome countries it isn’t.Discussion 4: Collaboration between AuthoritiesQuestion 12: Which of the two options for the introduction of an alert mechanism forhealth professionals within the IMI system do you prefer?
Page 1 and 2: BIS Green Paper Consultation event,
Page 3: • (environment and animal welfare
Page 7 and 8: • Focus groups: mandating coopera

Main Green Paper questions for discussion - ukipg

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?