- Page 1 and 2:
RENDEZVOUS AND DOCKING OFSPACECRAFT
- Page 3 and 4:
PART 1: INTRODUCTION TO RENDEZVOUS
- Page 5 and 6:
THE SCENARIO IN LEOTHE LEO SCENARIO
- Page 7 and 8:
THE INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION (IS
- Page 9 and 10:
SYSTEM AND FUNCTIONS IN GEO RVD (SC
- Page 11 and 12:
¨©¡¡¡¡ ¢¢£££¢¢¢£££
- Page 13 and 14:
LAUNCH INTO THE ORBIT PLANE OF THE
- Page 15 and 16:
DEFINITION OF PHASE ANGLEOrbital Pl
- Page 17 and 18:
TRAJECTORIES IN EARTH CENTRED ANDTA
- Page 19 and 20:
Hill EquationsFor circular orbits,
- Page 21 and 22:
USE OFCLOHESSY-WILTSHIRE EQUATIONSA
- Page 23 and 24:
IMPULSIVE TRAJECTORIESTANGENTIAL MA
- Page 25 and 26:
THE PREDOMINANT DISTURBANCES IN LEO
- Page 27 and 28:
EFFECTS OF THE SOLAR PRESSURE IN GE
- Page 29 and 30:
DRIVERS FOR RENDEZVOUS STRATEGIES I
- Page 31 and 32:
DRIVERS FOR RVD STRATEGIES IN THE S
- Page 33 and 34:
COMMUNICATION RANGE OF GROUND STATI
- Page 35 and 36:
APPROACH STRATEGY EXAMPLE(JAPANESE
- Page 37 and 38:
PART 1: INTRODUCTION TO RENDEZVOUS
- Page 39 and 40:
THE PROBLEM OF CAPTURELAW OF CONSER
- Page 41 and 42:
Shock Attenuation DynamicsBasic Spa
- Page 43 and 44:
TYPES OF DOCKING MECHANISMTWO BASIC
- Page 45 and 46:
PART 1: INTRODUCTION TO RENDEZVOUS
- Page 47 and 48:
THE AUTOMATIC ONBOARD CONTROL SYSTE
- Page 49 and 50:
CLOSED LOOP GNC BLOCK DIAGRAMSENSOR
- Page 51 and 52:
THE MISSION + VEHICLE MANAGEMENT (M
- Page 53 and 54:
FAULT TOLERANCE AND RECOVERY CONCEP
- Page 55 and 56:
COLLISION AVOIDANCE MANOEUVRE (CAM)
- Page 57 and 58:
THE NAVIGATION REQUIREMENTS FOR ARD
- Page 59 and 60: MEASUREMENT PRINCIPLES: RGPSRELATIV
- Page 61 and 62: MEASUREMENT PRINCIPLE OF LASER RANG
- Page 63 and 64: PART 1: INTRODUCTION TO RENDEZVOUS
- Page 65 and 66: WHY DO WE WANT TO HAVE AN AUTOMATIC
- Page 67 and 68: THE ROLE OF HUMAN OPERATORS INAUTOM
- Page 69 and 70: THE TASKS OF GROUND OPERATORS IN AR
- Page 71 and 72: RENDEZVOUS CONTROL SYSTEM DISPLAYPH
- Page 73 and 74: WHAT IS DIFFERENT BETWEEN RVD IN GE
- Page 75 and 76: THE MAJOR DIFFERENCES: ORBITAL DIST
- Page 77 and 78: THE MAJOR DIFFERENCES:COMMUNICATION
- Page 79 and 80: THE MAJOR DIFFERENCESGENERAL PROBLE
- Page 81 and 82: ALLOCATION OF TASKS TO SPACE- AND G
- Page 83 and 84: PART 2VERIFICATION & VALIDATION PRI
- Page 85 and 86: GENERAL RVD VERIFICATION ISSUES (co
- Page 87 and 88: DEFINITION OF VERIFICATION AND VALI
- Page 89 and 90: PART 2VERIFICATION & VALIDATION PRI
- Page 91 and 92: VERIFICATION AND VALIDATIONIN THE D
- Page 93 and 94: VERIFICATION IN THEFEASIBILITY STUD
- Page 95 and 96: VERIFICATION IN THE EARLY DESIGN PH
- Page 97 and 98: VERIFICATION IN THE FINAL DESIGN PH
- Page 99 and 100: MERGING OF GNC, MVM AND FDIR IN O/B
- Page 101 and 102: CLOSED LOOP GNC SIMULATION WITH O/B
- Page 103 and 104: CLOSED LOOP GNC SIMULATION WITHREAL
- Page 105 and 106: VERIFICATION IN THE FLIGHT ITEMMANU
- Page 107 and 108: PART 2VERIFICATION & VALIDATION PRI
- Page 109: CLOSED LOOP GNC SIMULATION WITHREAL
- Page 113 and 114: PART 2VERIFICATION & VALIDATION PRI
- Page 115 and 116: VERIFICATION OF CAPTURE IN THE DOCK
- Page 117 and 118: VERIFICATION OF CAPTURE INTERFACESI
- Page 119 and 120: PART 2VERIFICATION & VALIDATION PRI
- Page 121 and 122: CLOSED LOOP SIMULATION WITH O/B COM
- Page 123 and 124: VALIDATION OF SIMULATION MODELS (co
- Page 125: DEVELOPMENT LIFE CYCLE OF A SPACE P