13.07.2015 Views

Blagrove (Oliver) v R.pdf - The Court of Appeal

Blagrove (Oliver) v R.pdf - The Court of Appeal

Blagrove (Oliver) v R.pdf - The Court of Appeal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

consisting <strong>of</strong> two and a half pages each signed by meis true to the best <strong>of</strong> my knowledge and belief and Imake it knowing that if it is tendered in evidence, Ishall be liable to prosecution if I had willfully statedin it, anything to be false or to not believe to be true,…, the seventh <strong>of</strong> seventh <strong>of</strong> ‟06 and taken by me theseventh <strong>of</strong> July, 3:00 a.m.” [Pages 87-90 <strong>of</strong> thetranscript][5] Detetective Corporal DaCosta recalled that on 6 July 2006, he had recorded astatement which was given by Tamara Cooper and had caused one to be taken fromKirk Miller. After the report was made, he went to the applicant‟s house, spoke to himand took him into custody for questioning. <strong>The</strong> applicant told him that he was notinvolved in any incident because he was at home all evening with his wife and family.Detective Corporal DaCosta subsequently accompanied both Miller and Cooper to theirhome at 35 ½ Evan Street. He saw impressions in the board house which he said wereconsistent with gunshot marks. He had also seen what appeared to be a gunshotimpression on a drill bit that was in a bucket. Four 9 mm empty casings were found 30feet away from the board house.[6] <strong>The</strong> applicant was interviewed by Detective Corporal DaCosta on 10 July 2006.He was asked a number <strong>of</strong> questions in the presence and hearing <strong>of</strong> his attorney-atlawin order to clarify certain ambiguities that arose in the statement given by TamaraCooper. <strong>The</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficer said that the applicant was called by other names so he was tryingto ascertain what the other names were. <strong>The</strong> applicant was subsequently arrested andcharged for <strong>of</strong>fences <strong>of</strong> shooting with intent and illegal possession <strong>of</strong> firearm. He

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!