- Page 6 and 7: three respondents to the investigat
- Page 10 and 11: ecause there is a pattern of violat
- Page 12: .9. Notice of this Order shall be p
- Page 15 and 16: tapered, fully-colored cap that con
- Page 17 and 18: importation during the reporting pe
- Page 19 and 20: VIII.ConfidentialityAny request for
- Page 21 and 22: final judgment, reverses any Commis
- Page 24 and 25: PUBLIC VERSIONSome respondents were
- Page 26 and 27: PUBLIC VERSION19 U.S.C. 0 1337(d)(2
- Page 28 and 29: PUBLIC VERSIONInv. No. 337-TA-487,
- Page 30 and 31: PUBLIC VERSIONany marks or trade dr
- Page 32 and 33: PUBLIC VERSIONexclusion order limit
- Page 34 and 35: PUBLIC VERSIONinsufficient, the Com
- Page 36: Page 2 - Certificate of ServiceON B
- Page 39 and 40: like or directly competitive with t
- Page 42 and 43: APPEARANCESFor Complainant Sanford,
- Page 44 and 45: XIV. Bond .........................
- Page 46 and 47: I. Procedural HistoryThe notice of
- Page 48 and 49: Luxor International Pvt. Ltd. (Luxo
- Page 50 and 51: Order Nos. 16-18, which issued on F
- Page 52 and 53:
Complainant argued that it should b
- Page 54 and 55:
“finding of infringement.” In c
- Page 56 and 57:
[a]s the Commission made clear in S
- Page 58 and 59:
a general exclusion order by substa
- Page 60 and 61:
of said respondents manufactures, m
- Page 62 and 63:
Mon Ami, in the Statement of Inform
- Page 64 and 65:
Sanford, at q[ 13 of its complaint,
- Page 66 and 67:
That reported{} (See CX-81.) ASfor
- Page 68 and 69:
Determination at 46-49 (referring t
- Page 70 and 71:
Section 43 of the Lanham Act embrac
- Page 72 and 73:
A representative sample drawn from
- Page 74 and 75:
products entered the market (Respon
- Page 76 and 77:
SHARPIE@ fine-point permanent marke
- Page 78 and 79:
(May 6,1991) (Initial Determination
- Page 80 and 81:
of confusion among an appreciable n
- Page 82 and 83:
very similar to the SHARPIE@ word m
- Page 84 and 85:
$20, consumers would not spend subs
- Page 86 and 87:
. Dr. Cogan drew{} CX-111C at 14.c.
- Page 88 and 89:
website showing products{listings s
- Page 90 and 91:
- viz. that the accused Mon Ami mar
- Page 92 and 93:
XI.Domestic Industry - Trademarks I
- Page 94 and 95:
Physical Exh. 1-6.)2. Economic Pron
- Page 96 and 97:
which include the SHAWlE@ internet
- Page 98 and 99:
under the headmg “VIII. Injury To
- Page 100 and 101:
industry involved in the trademarks
- Page 102 and 103:
market. Air Impact Wrenches, 1991 W
- Page 104 and 105:
the evidence shows that the foreign
- Page 106 and 107:
Xm. RemedySanford seeks a general e
- Page 108 and 109:
and Target all the way down to smal
- Page 110 and 111:
} (CX-36143.) Said costs would be f
- Page 112 and 113:
}.’, (CX-185; CX-78 6,9.)The sec
- Page 114 and 115:
embody the trade dress at issue: As
- Page 116 and 117:
This initial determination, pursuan
- Page 118 and 119:
CERTAIN INK MARKERS AND PACKAGINGTH