<strong>Newberry</strong> <strong>Essays</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Medieval</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Early</strong> <strong>Modern</strong> Studies 7Models of Pastoral Care <strong>and</strong> Church OrganizationMuch recent work among scholars of early medieval Irel<strong>and</strong> has centered on the organization ofthe church <strong>and</strong> the adm<strong>in</strong>istration of pastoral care from the era of monastic missionaries, beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong> the fifth century, to the formulation of a parish system, beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g the twelfth-centuryreform movement driven largely by the <strong>in</strong>troduction of cont<strong>in</strong>ental religious houses <strong>and</strong> Anglo-Norman colonialism. The general trend <strong>in</strong> scholarship of late has been the repudiation of anorthodox position that the early medieval Irish church was primarily monastic, largely un<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong>pastoral care, <strong>and</strong> organized <strong>in</strong>to federations of monastic communities united by shared foundersa<strong>in</strong>tsbut dispersed over wide geographic areas. To the contrary, historian Colmán Etch<strong>in</strong>gham has<strong>in</strong>sisted that Irish textual evidence “reveals no systematic dist<strong>in</strong>ction between monastic <strong>and</strong> nonmonasticchurches” <strong>and</strong> recent discussions have envisaged a functionally diverse church morefundamentally <strong>in</strong>terdigitated with secular society <strong>and</strong> its territorial structures. 1212 Etch<strong>in</strong>gham, Church Organization, 457; K. Sims, “Frontiers <strong>in</strong> the Irish Church: Regional <strong>and</strong> Cultural,” <strong>in</strong> Colony <strong>and</strong>Frontier <strong>in</strong> <strong>Medieval</strong> Irel<strong>and</strong>: <strong>Essays</strong> Presented to J. F. Lydon, ed. T. Barry, R. Frame, <strong>and</strong> K. Simms (London: Cont<strong>in</strong>uumInternational Publish<strong>in</strong>g Group, 1995), 177-200 [182-5].23
Sa<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> the SeascapeAs documentary historians po<strong>in</strong>t out, contemporary hagiography <strong>and</strong> prescriptive texts like RíagalPhátraic <strong>and</strong> Córus Bésgnai <strong>in</strong>dicate that the adm<strong>in</strong>istration of sacraments—especially baptism <strong>and</strong> lastrites—to lay people was considered an important service, though they disagree on how often orbroadly it was carried out. 13 Pastoral care is usually conceived as one half of reciprocal if not entirelyequal relationship between church establishments <strong>and</strong> lay people. In the later medieval <strong>and</strong> earlymodern parish model, those people liv<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> the territorial extent of a parish paid a tithe to theirparish church <strong>in</strong> return for spiritual care. This <strong>in</strong>cluded most crucially access to the sacramentsnecessary for salvation that, accord<strong>in</strong>g to orthodox ideology, could only effectively be adm<strong>in</strong>isteredby the orda<strong>in</strong>ed clergy. The Synod of Cashel <strong>in</strong> 1172, one of a series of reform<strong>in</strong>g synods <strong>in</strong> thetwelfth century, called for all of the faithful to pay tithes to their churches, but it is unclear what k<strong>in</strong>dof system of extraction may have existed before—<strong>and</strong> even after—that proclamation.Aside from the sacraments, lay pilgrimage to sa<strong>in</strong>ts’ shr<strong>in</strong>es on important feast days is wellattested <strong>and</strong> may have been related to extractions of dues from lay people to churches. Thoughmore often associated with the peregr<strong>in</strong>i, holy men who undertook exile as a form of aimlesspilgrimage for the love of God, isl<strong>and</strong> monasteries, as suggested by both Inishmurray <strong>and</strong> Inishark,could also attract lay pilgrims. 14Most likely, this flow of lay pilgrims would have provided monastic communities with an importantsource of revenue <strong>in</strong> the form of <strong>in</strong>cidental donations if not formalized extractive practices.<strong>Early</strong> medieval churches often relied on secular authorities for patronage <strong>and</strong> protection, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>deedEtch<strong>in</strong>gham <strong>and</strong> Mac Samhra<strong>in</strong> among others have proposed an alternative model of churchorganization that envisions ecclesiastical communities latch<strong>in</strong>g onto exist<strong>in</strong>g secular territorialstructures. 15 In this “territorial model,” pr<strong>in</strong>cipal churches were affiliated with subord<strong>in</strong>ate churcheswith<strong>in</strong> a spatial doma<strong>in</strong> commonly more or less commensurate with that of secular k<strong>in</strong>gdoms. Thedegree to which affiliations with<strong>in</strong> this territorial model were <strong>in</strong>stitutionalized, with renders fromsub-churches to pr<strong>in</strong>ciple churches, is uncerta<strong>in</strong>, <strong>and</strong> Etch<strong>in</strong>gham’s analysis of contemporary textualevidence suggests that autonomy <strong>and</strong> subservience could exist on a wide spectrum of possibilities. 16In any case, it has been hypothesized that these patterns of territorial organization would haveconstituted the basic framework around which parochial territories were eventually formalized. 17Only a few regional case studies have put these new models to test. Ó Carragá<strong>in</strong>’s exam<strong>in</strong>ation ofthe l<strong>and</strong>scape of ecclesiastical communities on the D<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>and</strong> Inveragh pen<strong>in</strong>sulas <strong>in</strong> County Kerry13 R. Sharpe, “Churches <strong>and</strong> Communities <strong>in</strong> <strong>Early</strong> <strong>Medieval</strong> Irel<strong>and</strong>: Towards a Pastoral Model,” <strong>in</strong> Pastoral Care beforethe Parish, ed. J. Blair <strong>and</strong> R. Sharpe (Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1984), 81-109; Etch<strong>in</strong>gham, “Two-TierService.”14 On the peregreni see T. Charles-Edwards, “Social Background,” <strong>and</strong> M. Dunn, The Emergence of Monasticism: From theDesert Fathers to the <strong>Early</strong> Middle Ages (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000), 140.15 C. Etch<strong>in</strong>gham, “The implications of paruchia,” Ériu 44 (1993): 139-62; A. Mac Shamhra<strong>in</strong>, Church <strong>and</strong> Polity <strong>in</strong> Pre-Norman Irel<strong>and</strong>: The Case of Glendalough (Maynooth: An Sagart, 1996).16 Etch<strong>in</strong>gham, Church Organization, 221.17 P. J. Duffy, “The Shape of the Parish,” <strong>in</strong> The Parish <strong>in</strong> <strong>Medieval</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Early</strong> <strong>Modern</strong> Irel<strong>and</strong>, 33-61 [41-5].24